Nov 29: “Moving the writ” confirms Croydon election date

The Croydon North by-election date is confirmed today with Labour “moving the writ” in parliament. ANDREW PELLING, a former parliamentarian, explains the arcane process

It isn’t just courts that issue writs.

The people of Croydon North have been waiting for 40 days for a writ to be issued by the Speaker of the House of Commons for the by-election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of the sitting MP Malcolm Wicks.

The understanding and precedent between the political parties represented in parliament is that a writ is proposed in the House of Commons within three months of the vacancy occurring by the party who previously held the seat. If parliament agrees, the Speaker issues the writ.

www.parliament.uk advises that, “Until a new MP is elected, constituency matters are handled by an MP of the same party in a neighbouring constituency.”

Despite all these commonly understood practices, the Croydon Central MP had been getting all a little impatient, taking to social media this week to suggest that the by-election might not take place on the November 29 date that had been trailed for the past fortnight, and to claim that he’s doing casework from Croydon North constituents, despite this being against the agreed practice of the work being the role of an MP as the same party as the deceased.

The Croydon North by-election, having first been considered for November 15 alongside three other by-elections, will now be held alongside a by-election in Middlesbrough caused by the death of their long-standing Labour MP, Sir Stuart Bell, and one in Rotherham prompted by the resignation of Denis MacShane over his expenses scandal.

The writ was moved, proposed in the House of Commons, this morning.

The writ sees the rare sight of the chief whip of the party which currently holds the seat speaking at the despatch box. Chief whips’ contributions in the House are normally restricted to procedural comments, although Patrick McLoughlan was famously very rude to Speaker Bercow from beside the Speaker’s chair when not speaking normally. It’s probably just as well that chief whips’ comments are limited, given Andrew Mitchell’s remarks about “plebs”.

The starting gun for a by-election is by precedent in the possession of the party previously holding the seat. It’s just a few words muttered “moving the writ” and the House agrees the proposal without dissent.

The declared candidates so far are:

  • Monster Raving Loony       John Cartwright
  • National Front                      Richard Edmonds
  • Respect                                    Lee Jasper
  • Green                                        Shasha Khan
  • UKIP                                         Winston McKenzie
  • Liberal Democrat                   Marisha Ray
  • Labour                                       Steve Reed
  • Young People’s Party             Robin Smith
  • Communist                               Ben Stevenson
  • Conservative                             Andrew Stranack
  • Inside Croydon: For comment and analysis about Croydon, from inside Croydon
  • Post your comments on this article below. If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in 2012 by-election, Andrew Stranack, Croydon Central, Croydon North, Gavin Barwell MP, Lee Jasper, Malcolm Wicks MP, Marisha Ray, Steve Reed MP, Winston McKenzie and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Nov 29: “Moving the writ” confirms Croydon election date

  1. The link to the Young People’s party above directs to a Wikipedia link which states: “The Young People’s Party is a political party in Sierra Leone without parliamentary representation.” A bit like their Croydon counterparts then.

  2. Oh dear. Thanks for that, David. There’s an automatic linking device on WordPress.

    We’d remove the link, but then who’d be able to find anything about YPP.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s