Croydon Council has refused permission for a community group in South Norwood to stage a re-naming ceremony of a local beauty spot, an event to which locals had invited BBC television’s Sherlock, Benedict Cumberbatch, to attend as guest of honour.
The South Norwood Tourist Board wants to stage the naming ceremony on February 1, to re-title a lake in a local park as Lake Conan Doyle – after the Sherlock Holmes creator, author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who used to live in the area.
But Croydon Council’s “head of public safety”, Tony Brooks, has vetoed the event.
Brooks is the same council officer who courted controversy recently by considering using “all available bye [sic] laws” to stop a local homelessness charity offering a soup kitchen in Queen’s Gardens.
Brooks will also have been involved with arranging for ex-squaddies from a firm of private contractors to patrol the town centre, handing out summary fines for minor offences, all on commission. Even though the company originally hired to do the job was in administration.
And Brooks was the man in charge of public safety on August 8, 2011, the day that rioting broke out across the borough.
Brooks says that the Lake Conan Doyle event cannot go ahead because Phil “Two Permits” Thomas, the council cabinet member responsible for the borough’s parks, does not know about it. This, of course, cannot be true, because Thomas is well-known to be a regular reader of Inside Croydon.
Brooks, a former police officer, has written to Paul Scott, a local Woodside ward councillor, saying, “I have advised that we are not in a position to give permission for the event to take place until I can satisfy our elected members and the Cabinet Member with responsibility for parks, that the necessary consultation has been conducted. I have also advised them that the Cabinet Member was not aware and would need to sanction any such event should it eventually take place…
“I have advised the Parks team to send a letter to the organisers indicating that we are not approving the event… In the meantime we will start the discussions with the cabinet member and look to conduct consultations to add to those already done, when I will be in a position to advise the Cabinet Member.”
It appears that the control freaks at Croydon’s Conservative-run council have a problem in embracing the national Tory policy of localism.
Brooks, with more than 30 years’ experience in the police, including working in the often controversial Territorial Support Group, was appointed by Croydon Council in 2009 on the watch of the then Tory councillor … cue drum roll … Gavin Barwell.
At the time of Brooks’ appointment, Barwell said, “Tony has a strong track record in responding to the concerns of local communities, and tackling crime and anti-social behaviour, so I’m really pleased to welcome him to our borough…
“Tackling crime is our top priority and we think Tony will work extremely well with our partners in the police,” Barwell said four years ago. Before the Croydon riots.
Today, a spokesperson for the South Norwood Tourist Board reacted to Brooks’ decision to ban their re-naming ceremony by saying, “Words fail us.
“But the ceremony will go ahead.”
Coming to Croydon
- Norwood Society talk, Upper Norwood Library, Jan 16
- Croydon Ramblers, Chelsham walk, Jan 19
- STDLCC Screening: The East, Jan 20
- STDLCC Screening: Winter Nomads, Jan 27
- Coulsdon and Purley Debating Society, Feb 3
- Babylon at the Spread Eagle Theatre, Feb 4-6
- Steve Knightly at Stanley Halls: Feb 5
- Purley Swimathon: Feb 8 and 13
- Mark Steel at Ashcroft Theatre, Feb 12
- Norwood Society talk, Upper Norwood Library, Feb 20
- Mr Pooter comes to Croydon, Feb 20-22
- Coulsdon and Purley Debating Society, Mar 3
- Norwood Society talk, Upper Norwood Library, Mar 20
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
Pingback: The game’s afoot: council bans Sherlock lake ceremony | Jason E Cooper
Mike Fisher was emailed regarding the plans in October.
http://southnorwoodtouristboard.com/2013/10/07/back-the-bid-and-support-our-request-for-lake-conan/
Yes, Watson. But you seem to assume that Councillor Fisher will have read his mail. Or done some work as a consequence of receiving it.
So far, we only have evidence to suggest that Fisher is, in fact, an outstanding example of first-rate taxidermy.
I think that may even be a compliment!
Clearly cash-strapped Croydon Council has a cunning plan.
It wants to sell naming rights for the lake. Conan-Doyle stands no chance, the man is dead.
So no go Sherlock, but maybe the council would look more kindly on Boris Johnson’s builder buddy, Barratt Homes.
Can they call the lake “The Blue Carbuncle”?
Everything must be going very smoothly within the Borough at present if the renaming of a lake becomes such an issue of importance. It is of course of no significance whatsoever to the writer if the lake is called Sherlock Holmes or Moriarty but the story has fuel enough to form yet another attack on the Conservative Party. I do not vote Conservative, but it’s getting a little sad that this site is hell bent on having a Labour Council in Croydon next May. It continues ad nauseam, to scrape up issues of little consequence and smear individuals on the Council and MP’s accordingly. I am no fan of Dudley Meade but remember Derek Hatton in Liverpool? He practically bankrupted the Borough singlehanded and is now a millionaire living in a City Centre Penthouse. Does Croydon really need Councillors like this? It is starting to emerge that although denying to be on a “mission”, that is pretty much where this site is heading. A “mission” to elect a Labour controlled Council who’s handling of the national economy resulted in a 1.3 trillion pound debt that we all, and that includes the residents of Croydon, will be paying for, for years and years to come.
David: if you dislike it so much, why do you continue to read and comment (counter-factually, ignorantly and illiterately, it has to be said) so often?
This site has smeared no one, but merely reported on the self-serving idiocies and imbecilities of its ruling Establishment. Clearly, you are content with the way Croydon is run. Pardon us if we reject that cosy complacency.
Pingback: Day 386: Clues | The Year(s) of Living Non-Judgmentally