Incinerator campaign in 11th-hour appeal for legal funds

The Stop the Incinerator Campaign could yet be denied its day in court – all for a lack of money.

Shasha Khan: urgently needs funds to bring incinerator case to court

Shasha Khan: urgently needs funds to bring incinerator case to court

The campaign was expecting to begin its judicial review of the Beddington incinerator scheme – which has the backing of Sutton, Croydon, Kingston and Merton councils – at the High Court in The Strand on Thursday morning. They are also planning a protest outside the court for 9.30 that morning.

But mounting legal costs have seen the campaign urgently needing a five-figure sum or risk losing its case before the judge has even taken his seat.

The case has been brought by a single individual, Shasha Khan, the local Green party activist, in an effort to minimise the potential damages if the case fails to succeed. Viridor and their local authority partners in the South London Waste Partnership have threatened all sorts of dire financial consequences against the campaigners.

Leading the campaigners’ legal team has been Justine Thornton, a noted barrister working in environment law, who is also the wife of Ed Miliband.

Despite year-round fund-raisers, quiz nights, the backing of a number of leading figures and donations from generous supporters, the campaign is still short of funds.

“Shasha has stood up for many in Croydon and the surrounding boroughs to oppose the incinerator,” one of his supporters said today. “He now needs us to unite once more. He needs to put up £8,000 immediately for his solicitors’ and barristers’ costs. £8,000 has already been raised.

“We all need to ask how much is it worth to us to safeguard our community’s health and environment and back the man – it is frightening being out there alone.”

It will not be the first time that a resident-led attempt to use the courts to block the council steamroller has been frustrated by lawyers’ mounting bills: last year, an attempt to stop Croydon Tories’ unlawful sale of elements of its Riesco collection of Chinese pottery foundered against mounting legal costs.

A judicial review is supposed to be the citizen’s legal recourse to challenge the conduct of local authorities and other major players, with a High Court judge acting as arbiter. In reality, with an “entry fee” of at least £15,000, the legal profession’s bills have effectively priced most earnest and honest citizens out of ever being able to hold their councils to account.

“Our councils are able to use our own money to fight against our complaints in a judicial review,” a member of the Riesco campaign team told Inside Croydon. “And if they don’t beat us with legal argument from their lawyers, then nine times out of 10, our own lawyers will frustrate our own case with their legal bills.”

In Croydon, Labour took control of the Town Hall in May. After five years of using the incinerator campaign as part of its political opposition against the previously Tory-controlled council, the Labour group has suddenly gone very quiet about its environmental concerns over rubbish burning going on in an industrial scale right on the borough boundary at Beddington.

Council leader Tony Newman has even taken to referring to the incinerator as the “energy from waste plant”, the preferred terminology of contractors Viridor, who have a £1 billion publicly financed 25-year contract at stake.

Requests for sight of the full, unredacted contract with Viridor by the campaign’s legal team were refused for months, despite the legal principle of disclosure before a case such as this.

“There’s a sense that Labour are waiting for the judicial review, to see how that plays out,” a campaign supporter said. “The myth that Labour in Croydon and in Merton have bought in to is that it would be far too expensive to withdraw from the Viridor contract now – though they refused to reveal the details of the contract to prove it.

“That just ignores the argument that nothing is too much when the health of generations of our children are at stake, and there is long-term scientific evidence from other urban incinerators in south London that show a rise in infant mortality and other illnesses,” the campaigner said.

“Please do not leave Shasha Khan to stand alone for Croydon. Please back him and ask your neighbours to pitch in.”

Coming to Croydon

  • Inside Croydon: Croydon’s only independent news source, based in the heart of the borough: 407,847 page views (Jan-Jun 2014) If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Business, Community associations, Croydon Council, Environment, Outside Croydon, Refuse collection, Shasha Khan, Stuart Collins, Sutton Council, Waddon, Waste incinerator, Wildlife and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Incinerator campaign in 11th-hour appeal for legal funds

  1. There is no need for a legal challenge as we now have a Labour controlled council in Croydon. The Labour group was completely against the incinerator proposal and I am sure they will do everything possible to stop this going ahead.

    If you need any support you should contact the Tory party chairman Grant Shapps who has successfully campaigned against an incinerator in Hatfield.

  2. Danny Stanzl says:

    The lack of comments on this article and the lack of enthusiasm for funding the cause, makes it look like the majority, rightly or wrongly do not care.

    Personally I feel like both sides are exaggerating the truth, with the same old people that complain about everything, complaining about it and obviously the council and Viridor saying it’s all good.

    .. I’m left thinking just to let things happen. Most people I speak to either don’t know it’s happening or do not think there is any problem with it.

  3. Of course there is a need for a legal challenge. Those of us that prefer clean air need to stand up and be counted and not be the victims of schizophrenic politicians.

Leave a Reply