Benn launches her election campaign. Not that you’d notice

STEVEN DOWNES on the non-existent General Election campaign across most of south London

Yesterday evening, I made one of my occasional appearances on a recording of Metroknobbers, the south London hyperlocal podcast organised by Jason Cobb, who writes on matters Lambeth with BrixtonBuzz, and Darryl Chamberlain, of 853blog.com, who concerns himself with events closer to the Meridian.

Emily Benn and Uncle Hilary get the Labour campaign in Croydon South underway... in Croydon Central

Emily Benn and Uncle Hilary get the Labour campaign in Croydon South underway… in Croydon Central

The talk was much about how deeply dull the General Election is turning out to be for many south Londoners. As a consequence of the first-past-the-post voting system and through accident of geography and house prices, many of us are disenfranchised, living in a “safe” Labour or Tory seat where how we vote matters little, and so are pretty much consigned to a deeply dull General Election.

There’s virtually no campaigning going on at all in Lambeth, nor in Greenwich, Woolwich and Eltham, where the parliamentary incumbents, or their party-picked successors, are all a bit of a shoo-in, allowing them to spend the next month campaigning largely for other party members in other, winnable, marginal seats.

Between the three of us, it turned out during the Metroknobbers discussion that only we here at Inside Croydon have we the frisson and excitement of the sort of key marginal to get Peter Snow’s Swing-o-Meter twirling in Croydon Central.

The disappointment of m’colleagues in their uncontested democratic elections was evident. You can hear the episode in full here. The disengagement with the electoral process was tangible.

And meanwhile yesterday, less than a mile away from Inside Croydon Towers, another example of the non-contested General Election was taking place with the “launch” of the Croydon South campaign for Labour’s Hon Emily Benn. Inside Croydon did request a press release and photos from the event, but so far…. zilch, apart from the group shot, lifted from Twitter, of the candidate and a cast of dozens taken on the sunny afternoon.

So much for campaigning zeal in Croydon for the 2015 General Election, then.

The launch event did not even take place within the constituency which Benn is contesting (we use the latter word in its broadest sense). It was staged at Ruskin House, the local Labour Party headquarters, which happens not to be in Croydon South. By all accounts, it was very much a family affair, attended by former cabinet member Uncle Hilary and several other relatives of the late and widely admired Tony Benn.

The acceptable face of Thatcherism in 2014? Chris Philp, the next MP for Croydon South

Not as posh as the Labour candidate: Chris Philp, the next MP for Croydon South

New readers can catch-up here. The Hon Emily’s father, Stephen Benn, wasted no time last year in re-activating the hereditary Stansgate peerage of which his father had spent nearly four years of his life battling to rid himself. To his lasting credit, Tony Benn preferred to be an elected parliamentarian, rather than being foisted on the people simply because his father had been granted an honour.

As the daughter of a Viscount, Emily Benn is granted an honorific (or so we’re told by someone who possesses a copy of Debrett’s), though she probably doesn’t use it when working as a City banker. It does, however, make her much posher than Chris Philp, the Tory candidate who will win the Croydon South seat, and who although he is a millionaire, is what some call “self-made” and is therefore very much “new money”. Emily, meanwhile, is New College, Oxford.

Emily describes herself as “a Benn, not a Bennite”, which some may choose to interpret as meaning she’s prepared to utilise the family name to further her political career, but not embrace all of her grandfather’s principles.

In 2010, somewhat precociously at the age of 20, Emily Benn stood for Labour in an unwinnable south coast seat, and managed to reduce her party’s share of the vote. Last year, after some shuffling of Labour candidates, she was elected as a Croydon councillor in the safe ward of West Thornton. Later, she was selected as the parliamentary candidate for Croydon South. Not that there was any other real volunteers for this thankless task.

The odd thing here is why – having already endured the thankless task of losing a very lose-able seat five years ago – Benn is bothering to endure that experience once again.  Some suggested that, had she wanted to venture beyond Croydon, she might have found a safe Labour seat.

However moribund Labour’s campaigning in Croydon South might appear this time, it is already far more active than in 2010, when all Croydon Labour’s efforts were directed at getting the late Gerry Ryan elected in Croydon Central.


Croydon South 2010 General Election result

Conservative 28,684
Liberal Democrats  12,866
Labour  11,287
UKIP  2,504
Greens  981


That’s clearly still a priority in 2015, with Sarah Jones the candidate in the winnable marginal against the “Don’t Mention the Tories” Gavin Barwell. But Emily Benn is at least standing in a parliamentary seat which now has one council ward – Waddon – which has three Labour councillors, while the Labour constituency party’s family firm of chairman Andy Bagnall and secretary and treasurer Jo Milligan, appear to have some campaign plans which do involve the candidate being allowed to canvass in the constituency, unlike what was supposed to have happened for Jane Avis, the candidate five years ago.

When the British runner, Roger Black, went into the 1996 Olympic 400 metres final, he knew the best he could manage was to finish second to Michael Johnson. The question at hand was how close could he get to the world record-holder. So it is for Emily Benn in Croydon South.

Philp is the inheritor of 15,000-vote majority from the arch-expenses claimant, Tricky Dicky Ottaway. In 2010, the Tories’ closest rivals, buoyed on a wave of Cleggmania, were the LibDems. This time round, Benn will have failed if she does not get Labour into second place, and she should be aiming to reduce the Tory majority by half.

There’s a number of factors in play here, including national polling figures, demographic change, and the utter collapse of the LibDem vote generally and the apparent reluctance of their local activist candidate, Gill Hickson, to bother with any real campaigning. Approached recently by another website and asked to self-record a 30sec promotional video for them to broadcast, Hickson declared herself too busy…

Peter Underwood, as the Green candidate, could also benefit by managing to save his deposit this time, after his party polled less than 1,000 votes in 2010.

Benn was not helped by her own Labour council’s mishandling of the Purley Pool situation at the turn of the year, but she may be able to turn that to her benefit, claiming credit for getting the council to reverse its decision to close the pool.

And with UKIP’s Kathleen Garner eating into the Tory vote share, while Philp and most Conservative activists from Purley and Coulsdon are being deployed to try to save Barwell’s bacon in Croydon Central, the borough’s newest MP may be sent off to Westminster with a much reduced majority.

Our friendly psephologist, Walter Cronxite, has scribbled down some figures of what he believes the result in Croydon South might be on May 7:

Conservative 22,350 (40 per cent)
Labour   14,700 (26 per cent)
UKIP 10,200 (18 per cent)
Liberal Democrats 4,350 (8 per cent)
Greens  3,700 (7 per cent)

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in 2015 General Election, Chris Philp MP, Emily Benn, West Thornton and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Benn launches her election campaign. Not that you’d notice

  1. New College is pretty sound politically and includes alumni Tony Benn, Hugh Gaitskell, Rachel Reeves, Dennis Potter and Naomi Wolf plus the likes of Hugh Grant, Rick Stein and Kate Beckinsale.

  2. It’s easy to understand the annoyance of people living in the “safe” South London seats you mention that nothing much is happening in their areas. However it’s winning marginal seats like Croydon Central that will determine who forms the next Government.
    Three times in my lifetime Croydon Central (or its predecessor seat Croydon South) has been won or lost by less than 200 votes (in 1966 Labour won by 81, in October 1974 Tories won by 164, in 2005 Tories won by 75).
    In these circumstances it isn’t surprising that both Labour and the Tories pull in party workers from nearby constituencies in an effort to make that vital difference.
    However it’s important that every area receives some campaign as otherwise disillusionment with established parties and the political system generally will grow.

  3. It looks like the New Labour party (The so called working class party) is for Oxbridge educated.

  4. Whereas the Conservative parliamentary party is run by Bullingdon Club Old Etonians.

    • mraemiller says:

      “Whereas the Conservative parliamentary party is run by Bullingdon Club Old Etonians”

      Well all Bullingdon Club members by definition went to Oxbridge.

      To be honest this whole article is a bit of a character assassination on Emily Benn, isn’t it? Sort of an amusing one …I mean everything you say about her is true …but on the other hand at least she’s not a fake. She’s never hidden her past or pretended to be what she isn’t. I mean I’m not a fan of the woman but…

      “Emily describes herself as “a Benn, not a Bennite”, which some may choose to interpret as meaning she’s prepared to utilise the family name to further her political career, but not embrace all of her grandfather’s principles.”

      …whatever the benefits or not of using the family name and having family members who know the ropes ….it clearly is her name so surely she should use it and not be ashamed of it? I mean what do you want her to do? Change it by deed poll?

      It is depressing that we seem to get exactly the same DNA every generation but the Labour party needs people from all backgrounds including posh people. We can’t rely on middle class people like Jane Avis to lose Croydon South forever …eventually they realise it’s a dead horse they’re flogging and use their common sense.

      • Trouble with trying to be pedantic is that you have to get your facts straight.
        There is no place called “Oxbridge”, and no Bullingdon Club in Cambridge.
        So all Bullingdon Club members, by definition, went to Oxford.

        • mraemiller says:

          There is no place called “Oxbridge”

          No but there is, as William Makepeace Thackeray observed, a gestalt. Or did their university constituencies each elect two MPs to partilament till 1948 by chance? They lobby together, they go boating together, they model their institutions on each other so they deserve, in my opinion, a collective noun. I haven’t made any factual mistake, Mr Downes. In so far as Oxbridge exists as a political amalgam which I would advance it is …then by definition the Bullingdon Club is a subsection of it. Just as Jersey and Guernsey are both subsections of the Channel Islands. The statement “I went to the Channel Islands to meet Jim Bergerac” doesn’t cease to be true because Jim never goes to Gernsey or because Jersey and Guernsey are in two physically distinct locations. Neither does the statement that Bullingdon Club members went to Oxbridge become untrue because by definition Bullingdon Club members went to Oxford. Both statements are factually true.

          Anyway be that as it may … I’m still not sure what the point of dragging over Ms Benn’s ancestry is … are you calling on her to denounce her father The Hon Stephen Benn for availing himself of the available hereditary peerage? or make some political statement about this?

          Or are you just making fun of her because it is fun… the more serious question I posed is …so she’s a Benn … what do you expect her to DO about it?

          • Yawn.

            It’s Viscount Stansgate to you, pleb.

            And unless or until his daughter, The Hon Emily Wedgwood Benn, makes any statement to distance herself from her father’s unpicking of her grandfather’s work, then we will continue to refer to her by her correct title.

        • mraemiller says:

          More importantly still although I understand that Stephen Benn as indeed “re-activated” the hereditary Stansgate peerage this doesn’t, as far as I undertand it, entitle him to sit in the House of Lords. When a hereditary Peer dies there’s supposed to be a by-election as I understand it …which leads me to one of two conclusions 1) the man is just a bit of a sad snob …or 2) he wants to activate the seat to cause a by-election for political reasons …or 3) both. Which?

          • Yawn. Can you limit yourself to no more than one comment per day in future. And then of no more than 200 words?

            It is (1)

            It is not a by-election. But the anachronisms do vote among themselves to determine who gets voting rights on legislation.

  5. I didn’t say that the new Labour party is run by Oxbridge educated. It would have been better. At least there won’t be any flip flops.

  6. mraemiller says:

    It is my understanding that …
    http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/offices/lords/house-of-lords-information-office/by-elections/
    …if a life peer dies there should be a by-election. Although I’m not sure who votes in this except the Register of Hereditary Peers. So the sitting peers vote for the Hereditary Peers. So he can theoretically get into the House of Lords if a sitting hereditary peer dies and in a “by election” (for want of a better word) the sitting Peers elect him to become one of the 92 sitting hereditary Peers. As I understand it… and the Peers must vote for someone who is a Peer …but not a sitting peer (one of the 92)…

    …so maybe it’s not just about snobbery and there’s the outside chance he can get his bum on the red benches…?

    I think the by-elections only happen when a sitting hereditary peer dies.

    “Can you limit yourself to no more than one comment per day in future. And then of no more than 200 words?”

    Yes and No

Leave a Reply to mraemiller Cancel reply