Ash to ashes: unions boycott UKIP-dominated talking shop

Glen Hart: trades unions asked to boycott council-funded talking shop

Glen Hart: trades unions asked to boycott council-funded talking shop

Croydon’s trades unionists are being asked to boycott all future meetings of the “Croham Clux Clan” – what presents itself as a community talking shop sometimes also known as the Croydon Communities [sic] Consortium, or CCC.

This follows an order this week from the Borough Commander, Chief Superintendent Andy Tarrant, to Croydon police to not attend future CCC meetings, while Croydon Council is considering taking legal action to secure the refund of the unspent balance of a £5,000 grant of public money given to the body 18 months ago.

One of the strict conditions for receiving the council grant was for CCC to be “apolitical”. But CCC has been exposed as having several UKIP members holding key committee positions. CCC’s deputy chairman was UKIP’s election candidate in Croydon Central, while his predecessor was forced to stand down after issued UKIP-supporting tweets and Islamophobic messages on Twitter.

Glen Hart, a Thornton Heath-based trades union official, attended the last CCC annual meeting in November, where he says he was shouted down and abused.

A member of Croydon’s Trades Unions and Socialist Coalition, Hart told Inside Croydon, “TUSC will have nothing to do with the CCC while it seems to harbour UKIP members,  and it would encourage other residents to do the same.

“Croydon Council should withdraw any financial support.”

Croydon Council wrote to CCC chairwoman Elizabeth Ash in December demanding the refund of an unspent, one-year grant. The council is now considering legal action.

Ash has been briefing anyone who’ll listen (and they’d need to be prepared to listen for a very long time once Ash gets going) that the questions raised about CCC’s – and her own – conduct are all “personal”.

A senior Katharine Street figure dismissed this. They told Inside Croydon, “The CCC committee started off not being honest with the Croydon public, with some of them denying that they were members of UKIP, for instance.

“But now they need to be honest with themselves – it can hardly be a ‘personal’ matter when the Met Police, Croydon Council and local trades unions all agree that they do not want to have anything to do with the organisation or the people behind it. Community inter-action requires a high level of trust.”


Inside Croydon: Named among best regional media campaigns, 2014.

  • Croydon’s only independent news source, based in the heart of the borough: 729,297 page views in 2014.
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com

 

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Andy Tarrant, Community associations, Croydon Council, Mark Watson, Peter Staveley, Policing and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Ash to ashes: unions boycott UKIP-dominated talking shop

  1. The implication here is that no UKIP supporter should participate in anything. This is totally unacceptable bullying by the unions and the Labour council.

    • 1, No, that’s not the implication at all. The grant conditions are that the organisation has to be apolitical.
      2, It is ridiculous, and a tad pathetic, to suggest that this is bullying. The unions do not want to associate with an organisation which harbours racists and excuses overt racism. The police, too, have decided not to have anything to do with CCC. That isn’t bullying, either. And the council wants the public money returned. That isn’t bullying, but responsible governance.

      By the way, we have a rule on here about no anonymous commenters. If you haven’t got the courage of your convictions to use your real name, rather than some internet pseudonym, you won’t be afforded the privilege of commenting on this site. And no, that’s not bullying you or an impingement of your freedom of speech. Go and set up your own website to air your own views.

Leave a Reply