Yesterday, we published a map illustrating the incidence of obesity among 10 to 11-year-olds across the country, and in London.
Croydon is shown to have one of the highest obesity rates among that age group in London, and in the country, with more than 1 in 5 of the borough’s oldest children at primary school being assessed as obese.
Here’s the London section of that map again, with the dark colour indicating 22 per cent or more of children being obese:
Now here’s another map, showing the density of fast food outlets there are in each borough:
Notice the similarity between the higher incidence of childhood obesity and the availability of cheap, high calorific fast food?
If there is a public health crisis due to obesity, it is caused at least in part because of weak (and weakened) local authority planning powers – our council cannot determine when there are already enough fried chicken takeways (or charity shops, or bookies) in a neighbourhood – coupled with this government’s continuing reductions in funding for sports and fitness activities in our schools and community clubs.
And any obesity among 10-year-olds today will be costing the nation far more in remedial medical treatment in two or three decades’ time.
The fast food outlets map is taken from the Office for National Statistics, in work conducted for Public Health England.The darkest colour on the map, as represented for Croydon, shows where there is more than 107 fast food outlets per 100,000 of population, or more than one takeaway for every 1,000 people.
The notes on the map state: “People generally have easy access to cheap, highly palatable and energy-dense food frequently lacking in nutritional value – such as fast food.
“Research into the link between food availability and obesity is still relatively undeveloped. The concentration of fast food outlets and takeaways varies by local authority in England. The scatter plot shows a strong association between deprivation and the density of fast food outlets, with more deprived areas having more fast food outlets per 100,000 population.”
You can see the map in full, with the accompanying report, by clicking here
-
Inside Croydon: Named among best regional media campaigns, 2014.
- Croydon’s only independent news source, based in the heart of the borough: 729,297 page views in 2014.
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
With the Croydon Local Plan proposing to site new primary and secondary schools (Cherry Orchard Rd – Stephenson House site, and Moreland Rd – Rees House) which do not have playing fields on site or even nearby, the prospect is that Croydon children will not have space for active play and physical education lessons without having to bussed to other areas. This does not bode well for local children and the overall community.
If your kids eat that crap, it’s your fault not the shops’
You risk a correlation/causation mistake here.
Can I suggest overlaying something like the Indices for Multiple Deprivation (http://indicesofdeprivation.co.uk) to explore a different angle?
You’re right, Peter, which is why we were careful to avoid making a direct link.
But the similarities in the two maps, and Croydon’s out-lying status as an outer London borough in both, is inescapable and striking.
I noted no direct link, hence saying ‘risk’ rather than ‘are’ 🙂
Courtesy of a friend on Facebook here’s a map of unemployment by borough. Also inescapably and strikingly similar: http://www.londonspovertyprofile.org.uk/indicators/topics/work-and-worklessness/unemployment-map/
Ever been on a bus in the afternoon after the mass school migration that happens everyday. Friend chicken bits everywhere!!
Also if Labour plan to build more social housing in Croydon , will it not make the unemployment figure even worse, and that doesnt include all the others who don’t even figure in employment/unemployed.
Other London boroughs should share the love.