Could Croydon Council be getting the jitters over the post-referendum prospects for the town centre’s redevelopment? WALTER CRONXITE looks at a cabinet report which tries to look on the bright side, but cannot disguise the uncertainties
Croydon faces “significant challenges both for the economy and the council” following last month’s Leave result in the EU referendum, according to a Town Hall report to be discussed on Monday.
Building high-profit flats should continue apace in Croydon. Other projects may be under threat due to Brexit, a council report says
The report is to be delivered by council leader Tony Newman at the Labour-run council’s cabinet meeting.
It has a No Shit Sherlock moment when it states that “considering the unprecedented volatility in a variety of economic inputs into the development process, it is difficult to predict the specific impact on development in Croydon with any certainty”.
The report offers a litany of the immediate consequences of the vote for Brexit, including the fall in Sterling, the downgrading of the UK’s credit rating, stock market volatility and a fall in bond values, none of which are regarded as particularly helpful to a borough which is hanging on for the promised benefits of multi-billion-pound development projects.
The report tries to offer some reassurance, stating that the outlook of Croydon’s major developers and investors “post-Brexit is positive”.
This part of the report reads as if it has been deliberately drafted to avoid causing any localised panic among Croydon businesses and the major schemes, including Ruskin Square and the £1.4 billion Hammersfield redevelopment which is as-yet-unstarted.
According to Croydon Council, Stanhope Schroders remain positive about the prospects for their long-delayed development of Ruskin Square, alongside East Croydon Station. A formal announcement is expected next week over its first office block, due for completion by the end of this year, which is to be leased to HM Revenue and Customs as a new taxation super-hub.
The council report states that Westfield and Hammerson have “confirmed that it is business as usual for them, and there are no changes proposed to the Whitgift scheme arising from the decision”.
This is not as reassuring as it may first seem.
“Business as usual” for Hammersfield in Croydon has seen no demolition or building work on the vast Whitgift Centre and Centrale site in four years, while the developers still require planning permissions to their significantly revised scheme. When the global financial meltdown hit, Westfield mothballed a (more modest) shopping mall scheme in Bradford for a decade, leaving a massive crater in the town centre and blighting the shopping district, seemingly permanently.
There remains a real risk of Croydon suffering the same fate.
The bright new future for the Whitgift Centre. But no work has started on site after four years
Because elsewhere in the same Croydon cabinet report, it contradicts its own balmy reassurances over Hammersfield with a clear warning: “Development and construction – major schemes in some markets which have not yet started on site…” thems our italics “…are likely to be delayed until there is more clarity about the level of demand in the economy.”
Or put another way: “business as usual”.
The report goes on to state: “Planned office development is most likely to be affected in this way, while residential development is least likely to be affected. Infrastructure and public sector development are also less likely to be affected, at least in the absence of any further public spending controls.” Yet, with Chancellor Gideon Osborne at the helm of the economy, the possibility of more austerity measures being passed down the line to local authorities, like Croydon Council, cannot be dismissed.
The report admits this: “The council has been planning on the basis of the Autumn Statement 2015 and consequential four-year settlement for local government, it is clear that from various announcements that there is potential that public sector spending will be reviewed as part of an Autumn Statement and this could lead to a revised settlement for local government. It is clear that funding for local government is inexorably linked to the strength of the British economy and therefore any relatively small adjustments could lead to further cuts for local government.” Again, our italics for emphasis.
Business as usual: Tony Newman is trying to see the sunny side of Brexit
“The plan to allow councils to retain 100 per cent of business rates by 2020, phasing out government revenue support grant, will make councils bear 100 per cent of the risk of a reduction in business rates and feel a more immediate impact of any downturn in the economy.” You can almost sense the report’s author wincing as they typed that sentence.
Elsewhere, the cabinet report reveals that “an announcement is expected very soon” for “a development partner” for the site of the former council offices at Taberner House, which has been standing vacant for two years.
And the report also suggests that demand for housing in London and the south-east is so high that the Brexit vote is “unlikely” to impact what it calls “suburban” house-building plans, such as with the council-owned Brick by Brick company.
“More formal market advice points towards a relatively stable environment in the short-term,” the report states. Citing just a single source, CBRE, the multi-national real estate business, the cabinet report states “that the Leave vote doesn’t reduce the pent-up demand in the UK housing market, so while it is likely to be a quiet summer for new residential sales, forced sales and/or a marked negative impact on property prices are unlikely. Indeed, if developers scale back and new housing supply contracts significantly, there may even be upward pressure on prices.” Which is hardly likely to cheer up those still seeking to to buy their first home.
The cabinet report reveals that Croydon Council has borrowed £25.745million from the European Investment Bank for schools projects and has a facility for £102million in total, to be drawn by December 2018.
“The availability of these funds is not expected to be affected by leaving the EU; there is now an added uncertainty of the interest rate although we still expect it to be better value than the Public Works Loan Board.”
But the prospect of Brexit means that there’s a diminishing chance of more European cash coming our way: “The ability of the council to borrow a further sum in support of our regeneration programme will depend on future exit negotiations.”
Croydon has also received £2.856 million from EU Corporate Social Responsibility funding for projects that have supported growth in small and medium-sized businesses and increased the employability of young people and the long-term unemployed. The council has a proposal under the European Regional Development Fund for a business growth programme with a total project value of £2 million.
“The outcome is pending,” the report states, which doesn’t sound particularly hopeful.
- Still Croydon’s only independent news source, and based in the heart of the borough: 1.97 million page views 2013-2015
- Inside Croydon: Named among best regional media campaigns, 2014
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event to publicise, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
They say “considering the unprecedented volatility in a variety of economic inputs into the development process, it is difficult to predict the specific impact on development in Croydon with any certainty”.
They mean: I haven’t a clue as to what will happen.
Not bad as a general motto either!
Wonder how many of these pension funds which have frozen their property accounts to prevent a liquidity drought have significant investments in the central Croydon business zone?
Firstly can I thank Inside Croydon for their photograph of my own property development in
Mint Walk!!
As a small developer I can only hope that the Brexit will have little effect on Croydon, however I am of the opinion that there will be a slow down. I believe that come the end of summer people will realise that Brexit itself is not as bad a some may have thought, and more importantly that life goes on, ie if people want a new home then they must press on.
I also am of the opinion that other developments will proceed, particularly homes as the demand will not go away.
These are slightly rocky times, but that was always going to be the case in the event of an Out vote, long term we shall be quids in.
If you are responsible for that development, can you explain how you got planning permission for a building which now towers so high that the Clocktower is no longer visible from the Flyover end of the High Street?
To exactly which we are you referring? Not most of us, really. Probably just you.
We gained permission upon appeal.
The council were in my view rather contradicting as they built their huge new offices 30 feet away, which I think is fair to say has a far more damning effect on views. For example from the High Street at say outside WH Smith the The Clocktower now looks like a Power Ranger with the council offices dominating. This, in my opinion, is wrong.
There is very little that my development is obstructing, indeed only the people leaving Greggs can argue their view is impaired !
There’s an ordnance in the City which is (supposed) to protect the cityscape views of St Paul’s Cathedral.
The Clocktower is no Wrenn masterpiece, but it is symbolic of central Croydon and it might seem reasonable for the line of sight to the building to have been protected.
The view of the Clocktower is now completely blocked from the south on the High Street.
Well done. Am sure you’ll enjoy the profits from your untrammelled overdevelopment.
What are you going to do in the future now that inadequate Boris has gone? Well perhaps this little burst of self-promotion activity demonstrates you have more on your mind than you are letting on.
I love the look of the Clocktower and indeed the Old Town Hall.It is a shame we do not have more beautiful buildings like them in Croydon. I really am a supporter of protecting these buildings and the views of them. However with my development it was already an impaired view, as the building had a pitched roof previously which had made the majority of the Tower obscured from the Flyover end of the High Street.
I certainly do hope I enjoy the profits, but I can tell you it has been very hard work to get where we are and continues to be so.