A charity which has handed over details of its homeless clients to the Home Office, as part of Theresa May’s “hostile environment” deportation policy, is one of the agencies being used by Croydon Council in its “campaign” to clear the town centre’s streets of beggars.
Last week, the Labour-run council announced its clampdown, with a cabinet member, Hamida Ali, warning, “If people continue to beg, and refuse to engage, or accept support, the next stage will be to take enforcement steps to stop this offence.”
Home Office vans like these were part of Theresa May’s ‘hostile environment’ strategy
Among the groups Croydon Council wants the homeless “to engage” with is Croydon Reach, who according to the council’s press release will be providing “shelter and support for the homeless”.
The reality is that that “shelter and support” for some of the borough’s vulnerable homeless could end up being under the roof of a Home Office immigration removal centre.
Croydon Reach is a off-shoot of the Thames Reach charity which last year admitted that they had been turning in homeless people to the Home Office, under Conservative government policy to deport foreign nationals forcibly. It is what May, when she was Home Secretary, called her “hostile environment” for migrants.
Enforcement activity against non-UK rough sleepers was stepped up in 2016, ahead of the EU referendum.
A report last March from Corporate Watch revealed concerns about homelessness charities’ links to immigration enforcement, as under measures plucked from an Orwellian dystopia the government sought information from landlords, schools and the NHS to assist with their strategy.
The Tory government has had charities check rough sleepers’ migration status
Joint visits by immigration officials and some charity workers in eight London boroughs in 2016 led to 133 rough sleepers being detained in immigration removal centres.
In one borough, Hammersmith and Fulham, a document disclosed under Freedom of Information Act was entitled “Enforcement policy for EU and non-EU nationals not engaging with the outreach team”.
The document explains a series of interventions one charity’s outreach workers have with non-UK rough sleepers. If the rough sleepers are deemed to have no right to remain in the UK and do not agree to return home voluntarily, the document states that “these individuals’ details will be passed on to the ICE [Home Office immigration, compliance and enforcement] by the outreach team”.
Thames Reach has taken a similar position. Last year, a spokesperson for that charity was quoted as saying, “Thames Reach has no powers to compel rough sleepers to return home but when we believe that individuals are at risk from living on the streets, where people are in extreme destitution, we will work with the Home Office to plan a way for them to return home.”
Thames Reach says that it strives “to ensure that the users of its services find and sustain a decent home, develop supportive relationships and lead fulfilling lives”. The charity’s website doesn’t say anything about how some of its clients might get deported if they share their personal details with the charity’s outreach workers.
Thames Reach says that it has the “highest aspirations, expectations and respect for service users”. And according to the Thames Reach website, Croydon Reach’s “outreach teams work on Croydon’s streets at night, following up referrals of homeless people who are thought to be sleeping rough.”
But Thames Reach is also the homelessness charity which last year stated, “There is no need to beg on the streets in 2017. Hostel rent is covered through Housing Benefit [and] it is an urban myth that if you have no address, you cannot claim benefits.”
The charity, which is primarily funded by the government, makes no mention of the many gatekeeping barriers vulnerable people must cross to secure benefits and a stable hostel place. And as Matt Broomfield wrote in a coruscating critique of homelessness charities’ attitudes, “Most damningly, they do not mention the fact that the foreign nationals who make up over half of London’s rough-sleeping population cannot claim benefits to access the hostel network at all. Rather, Thames Reach and other top charities shop homeless foreigners to the Home Office to be deported.”
Croydon BID: wants the public to donate to the government-backed charity
As part of Croydon’s new campaign against street beggars, the council and Croydon BID, the grouping of wealthy businesses who appear to find rough sleepers such an inconvenience, are even encouraging the public to donate to… Thames Reach, the government-sponsored snitches.
The nature of Croydon Council’s campaign – one week of offering some sort of support, or else – has all the appearance of the application of social cleansing of the town centre for the benefit of the businesses based there. In austerity Britain, 80 per cent of homeless people experienced no support or advice the last time they were moved on by police or council workers.
“When the government claims that most people begging on the street are refusing better help, what they mean is the help on offer is not adequate,” Broomfield wrote.
“Homeless people need free, state-provided housing and fully funded psychological care. What they get is £538million annual cuts to mental health services and austerity measures driving them into arrears with private landlords and on to the street.”
Civil liberties groups are also outraged at the way some charities, such as Thames Reach, are abusing their position of confidence with the vulnerable to help Theresa May’s Tory agenda.
“Using homeless charities to spy on the homeless is a new low, even for a government bent on bringing border controls into every corner of our lives,” said Martha Spurrier, director of Liberty.
“Turning unaccountable citizens into immigration officers can only lead to racial profiling, discrimination and alienation, raising tensions in already divided communities. If the Home Office genuinely wants to rise to the post-Brexit challenge, it must end this toxic ‘border on every street’ policy.”
While in Croydon, that “border on every street” policy is being applied today, by our Labour council and their friends at Thames Reach.
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network- Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
- 1.4 MILLION PAGE VIEWS IN 2017
- “Monitored” by the council CEO since 2010
- ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS 2017: Inside Croydon was source for two award-winning nominations in Private Eye magazine’s annual celebration of civic cock-ups
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
How very worth of the author!
People sleeping on the streets and beggars are a nuisance and a blight on an already very tired looking Croydon.
Illegal immigrants should quite rightly be rounded up and deported. Why anyone has a problem with this I do not know.
As for the beggars who are entitled to be here, the vast majority choose this form of life. Mostly through rejecting help that is offered to them, instead preferring to beg and steel to buy more booze and drugs. What more can be done for these people?
As far as I am concerned people who are working in Croydon are entitled to be able to go for lunch without being pestered by beggars. Parks 9and Im think Queens Garden in particular should be a nice place for people to turn up and eat their lunchtime sandwich. Why should it be spoilt by rowdy drunkards? Only those ludicrous liberals could justify these people loitering around the main streets of Croydon. These beggars contribute nothing, whilst those that they disturb are hard working tax payers who end up feeding them by their tax paying.
Yes this is harsh, but it is also right.
Not for the first time, David, you vent your bile without stating your vested interest, as a town centre property developer.
For you, it seems, human compassion for those less fortunate comes a long way down the priority list behind your pocket-lining bottom line.
Re-read your comment to yourself. Then read it to your family and friends (if you have any).
“The vast majority choose this form of life”. Seriously?
Proud of yourself?
It seems important to me that at least one person stands up and speaks out about anyone who advocates ‘rounding up’ people in the hope they find an’illegal immigrant’ amongst them. Within living memory another European country started rounding people up and look where that finished. Among the people who beg on the streets are those who are mentally ill and need to be treated and those who are addicted to alcohol and drugs and who also need treatment. Homelessness among young people increased dramatically as a result of changes in the benefit system that penalised those aged under 30 who previously might have qualified for help with rental. In addition housing prices have soared. Let’s address all these factors arising from cuts in government spending and social care provision. The only beneficiaries have been the very wealthy, perhaps those who sneer at and condemn homeless people. Let’s have a bit less intolerance about those who may have fled from war ones and gone through god knows what trauma. What they need is help not hatred and if the very agencies who claim to be there to help do the opposite, it’s a poor outlook.
Oh David, David, David with your lunchtime sandwich and bigoted views. As a formerly homeless person I could write a thesis on what is wrong with your argument but you seem to have made your mind up so I’ll probably just spend that time begging in Queens Garden because I know you love being apoplectic with indignation and I’d hate to ruin your lunch
There are people living under the Allders/Croydon Village portico. There are people living in the doorways of Electric House, there are people living in the George’s Walk phone boxes and I’ve seen an entire family living in the Poundland entrance to the Whitgift Centre. And there was an entire mini-Hooverville under one of the buildings over the road from the Allders carpark for a while until someone sealed the area off with boarding. I look at them and they’re not all drug/drink addicts and drop outs either – you can tell by the way they turn odd dry bits of land into workable living spaces. Even if you wanted to or could solve the problem by “moving people on” there’s clearly deeper problems in a society where people are living in a parallel economy/sub-society in this way in the first place. It’s like the homeless scandal of the 80s only worse…
What you say, and evidence, is so true. It is as if we are in the era of Charles Dickens, with critics eating sandwiches in Queens Gardens voicing opinions as harsh as the unreformed Scrooge, whilst people are inhabiting spaces far worse worse than the derelict warehouses of Oliver Twist.
The only difference is that the governments of 19th Century started to show a lot more compassion than this one and started to do something about it. Thanks also for pointing out that people who are homeless are not a homogenous group and it is so wrong to conflate begging, illegal immigration, drink and drug addiction and mental illness all together whilst completely ignoring the fact that, on this scale, we are seeing growing numbers of poor people who are simply afflicted by the failure to proper housing, whilst speculators are making fortunes by overdevelopment for the wealthy. Sorry it’s a bit of a rant but it is a subject that makes my blood boil.