Site icon Inside Croydon

Councillor says big-money deals for medical and radioactive waste are at centre of Viridor’s diesel tank planning application

A Sutton councillor claims that Viridor wants to begin burning medical and radioactive waste at its Beddington Lane incinerator, but that it has withheld these lucrative business plans from its latest application to build a large fuel tank on the site.

Dirty diesel: Viridor’s new fuel tank is required at the Beddington incinerator as part of plans to increase their capacity, claims a councillor

Independent councillor Nick Mattey has submitted 20 pages of objections to the application from the incinerator’s commercial operators to build an additional 11,000-litre fuel storage tank on site.

Among his detailed objections ahead of a council planning committee meeting this Wednesday, Mattey states that having a very large diesel fuel tank close to the incinerator will significantly increase the risk of fires on the site, with potential for damaging environmental and pollution impact.

Mattey claims the planning application under-states the capacity of the tank, and that the move signals Viridor’s intention to use more dirty diesel to get its furnaces up to the kind of temperatures required to burn medical waste and other potentially highly toxic and polluting substances.

Viridor operates the incinerator on the Sutton-Croydon borough boundary on behalf of SLWP, the South London Waste Partnership, the unaccountable local authority quango formed by Kingston, Merton, Sutton and Croydon councils.

SLWP has a 25-year contract with the American-owned business already worth £1billion. Now, it seems, Viridor is looking to improve its corporate profits at the expense of even worse air quality across south London.

Viridor already has an application to vary its licence, increasing its burning capacity at Beddington by 10per cent to 382,000 tonnes per year, lodged with the Environment Agency. It is Viridor’s second application to increase capacity at Beddington Lane in two years, having previously been granted permission for a 15per cent capacity increase in December 2020.

Critical: Nick Mattey

Councillor Mattey believes that within the increased tonnages, Viridor intends to burn medical waste and radioactive waste.

As well as used medical equipment, this could even include human body parts.

Incinerators handling medical waste can charge up to £1,000 per tonne. “Ordinary” domestic or business rubbish brings in less than £116 per tonne for incinerator operators such as Viridor.

Inside Croydon first reported on the incinerator’s capacity for handing radioactive waste in 2011.

This website also obtained a copy of Croydon’s contract with Viridor, which guaranteed payments of £10million per year for 25 years for its share of the incinerator operation, and which included requirements on the operators to be able to handle radioactive and medical waste.

In their planning application for the new tank, a second on the site, Viridor explained that the fuel would be used for “furnace flame”, which starts up the facility before waste is processed.

“The existing tank will be adapted to provide storage for ‘furnace flame’ fuel used for start-up purposes. The proposed fuel tank will store diesel fuel during plant start-up, when required, to maintain operating temperatures.”

In his objection, submitted ahead of the committee meeting, Mattey writes, “The need for such an on-site increase in the quantity of fuel stored specifically for start-up and temperature-maintenance fuel would only be of use if there was going to be a significant increase in the quantity of waste to be incinerated.

“This would be consistent with the reports of plans to increase the quantity of waste to be burnt at the plant.”

Mattey adds that the incinerator plant “has an outline permit for incinerating medical and low-level radioactive waste. For such an incinerator to operate it would need a continuous injection of furnace flame fuel to maintain the very high operating temperatures needed for this type of incineration…

“It is important that if the applicant is making the site ready to burn medical and low-level radioactive waste or to significantly increase the waste throughput, that these matters receive proper consideration. The impacts of the planning application should be considered but the impacts are hard to determine because the applicant has provided little information to explain their reasons for their application and no information on any benefits…

“… If deliveries continue with poor quality fuel [it] would be to enable a significant increase in capacity of the plant and to add the possibility of incineration of medical and low level radioactive at a later date.

“If changes are necessary to enable a capacity increase and function of the plant to be widened to include medical incineration then that purpose should be clearly stated and not hidden so that the impacts, which include transport, air quality and climate considerations, can be carefully considered.

“Uncontrolled fires have already occurred at the plant. Explosions from gas canisters have also occurred. There is a risk of further fires and explosions. The proposed storage of such a large quantity of additional fuel so near the incinerator increases the potential consequences of fires and explosions at the plant.”

There it is in black and white: Croydon’s original contract clause which demands that Viridor be able to dispose of radioactive waste at the Beddington Lane incinerator

A report to the planning committee from the council’s director of environment, Spencer Palmer, has recommended that pliant Sutton should grant permission. The proposal “would not result in any material change in emissions and the facility will continue to operate within the parameters set by the existing permits,” according to Palmer.

“The development would be acceptable in principle and would not have a detrimental impact on the openness of the ‘metropolitan open land’, would respect the local context of the site and would not result in significant harm to the character of the surrounding area or the ‘site of importance for nature conservation’.”

Read more: Cancer warning over radioactive waste plans for incinerator
Read more: ‘Nuclear’ Newman goes radio ga-ga over radioactive deal
Read more: Viridor incinerator given 20 warnings in just 15 months
Read more: Viridor breaking rules over incinerator’s pollution reports

Become a Patron!



Exit mobile version