Site icon Inside Croydon

Property investor Philp comes up short on Purley ‘skyscraper’

insidecroydon

Saffron SquareWe know that Chris Philp and Tim Pollard both read this website. So guys: Please take a look at the picture to the left. This is what people normally understand to be a “skyscraper”.

The picture shows what the towering tower at Saffron Square in West Croydon will look like when it is completed, “The centrepiece of the development… the impressive 43-storey tower, which will create a dominant focal point for the new Croydon skyline”, the developers gush.

Planning permission for Saffron Square’s tower, as well as the 55-storey Menta Tower skyscraper in Addiscombe and various other, developer-driven high-rise schemes in the northern part of the borough, were all granted during eight years of a Conservative-run Croydon Town Hall and under a Tory Mayor of London.

All protests from existing residents that such multi-million-pound schemes were in some way “inappropriate” for their neighbourhoods, or were aimed at overseas-based buy-to-let investors, rather than providing homes for local people, or that they represent over-development of certain parts of north and central Croydon, were waved aside – some might suggest somewhat arrogantly – by the then Tory council. It is worth remembering that most of Croydon’s Conservative councillors represent the south of the borough.

For the avoidance of doubt, a skyscraper is usually defined as a very tall building. The clue’s in the name: it scrapes the sky.

More than 40 storeys is generally recognised as being a skyscraper. Less than that, pah…

To the right is a picture of a garden shed. This is not a skyscraper.

Coming from the leafy southern suburbs, a garden shed is something with which Tim Pollard, the leader of the local Tory group, ought to be familiar. After all, there will soon be a time when it will provide a suitable venue for a meeting of his local party membership.

And when Chris Philp has managed to spend a bit more time in Croydon, he, too, may come to know how essential such sheds are in the southern suburbia.

We offer this introduction to what is, and what is not, a skyscraper because in the past day or so, Messrs Philp and Pollard have shown that they are somewhat confused on the matter.

They have launched a petition against what they call a “skyscraper” in Purley. The building proposed is a mere 16 storeys tall. Pah…

Now, we appreciate that both Philp and Pollard may have been living very sheltered existences until now, but 16 storeys is by no one’s understanding what can fairly be described as a “skyscraper”.

At less than one-third of the proposed height of the Menta Tower which Pollard’s administration inflicted on the residents of Addiscombe with such enthusiasm, the Purley proposal barely qualifies as a tower block.

 

How the reduction in the building of council houses since Thatcher has directly influenced rising property prices. Whose interests have been served by such policies?

The objections raised by Pollard and Philp appear to be a piece of glorified nimby-ism: not in my backyard. While the Conservative-led government acknowledges that there is a housing crisis across London and the rest of the country (see the graph above if you want a nudge in the direction of why this might be), it appears that as far as Philp and Pollard are concerned, when it comes to providing 16 floors of new homes, including some social housing, they don’t want it on their patch. Such community mindedness.

Philp is a multi-millionaire who makes generous donations to the Tory Party. It has been suggested that this is what helped to secure his selection as the Conservative candidate for Croydon South, with its comfortably safe 16,000 majority. He failed to become an MP five years ago when he tried to challenge Labour veteran Glenda Jackson in Hampstead, and lost. Even today, there are some things which money cannot buy.

Philp made his millions by investing in… property developments. It seems he’s just not so keen on developments when he hasn’t got a stake in the action.

Take Our Poll

 

Yesterday, he sent an email to those unfortunate enough to be on his mailing list, in which the soon-to-be-MP showed that he is…

This is what Philp regards as a “compromise”.

Purley Cross and Tesco: how would a 16-storey block be out of keeping with this?

In his email, Philp claimed that, “The owner of the site, the local Baptist Church, wants to build a much smaller building which included community facilities.” Philp has been asked for evidence of this claim.

Philp’s prose renders him prone to ridicule, as he repeatedly refers to “the 16-floor skyscraper”. Pah.

Does he know what he’s talking about?

“I and other local campaigners…” Philp fails to state who these local campaigners might be, “…strongly believe that a 16 floor skyscraper is totally out of keeping with a town like Purley”.

Really? We realise that Philp was parachuted in to Croydon South for his selection, but has he never gazed upon the glorious vista that is Purley Cross and Tesco? But then, last week he even referred to Purley as a “market town”, so it is fair to say that his local knowledge is still a bit sketchy.

“There is a danger that other developers will later try to use it as a precedent to build other skyscrapers in the area,” Philp claims, again without offering any evidence for his scare-mongering.

“If the council drops its demands for the £2 million payment and the social housing…  then a much smaller building will be financially viable,” Philp wrote.

Philp and the Croydon Conservatives have their petition which, as well as objecting to the development, also allows respondents to show their support for a scheme which will provide much-needed social housing and £2 million-worth of community benefits for the people of Croydon.

The Tory petition is here. Do take part. You ought not have to provide your contact details (for the Tories’ latest data-scraping exercise) to register your view.

Of course, since the Tory petition is in the hands of the local Tories, there’s no knowing how fairly they might deal with the responses if they don’t chime with their own nimby agenda, so we encourage our loyal reader also to take part in our online poll, above.

Let’s see how many people really do agree with Pollard and Philp’s nimby-ist desire to refund millions of pounds to developers and deny some local nurses, firefighters or teachers the chance of moving into some really affordable, social housing in our borough.


Exit mobile version