St Helier decision puts Sutton MP Burstow on the spot

St Helier Hospital: subject of a local campaign, subjected to national policy

CROYDON COMMENTARY: An MP for neighbouring Sutton got a most unwelcome birthday present yesterday, with the announcement of proposed closure to the Accident and Emergency and the maternity departments of St Helier Hospital. Here, ANDREW PELLING says that ConDem cuts are undermining the government’s junior partners locally

Tom Brake, the Carshalton and Wallington Liberal Democrat MP, was receiving a visit from an Elvis impersonator yesterday in celebration for his 50th birthday. He looks very healthy for his age. Tom Brake that is.

Sadly, if Tom does suffer any emergency illness in the future, he’ll likely not be visiting his local St Helier Hospital.

Across town an unelected and unaccountable “’scoring’ panel of 60 people, made up of councillors, GPs, patient groups and NHS representatives from the five boroughs of south-west London, recommended that St Helier Hospital could – potentially – lose its A&E and maternity units”. That’s the original quote from Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust.

Who knows how the other hospitals considered by this panel – Croydon’s own Mayday, Kingston and St George’s in Tooting – are going to cope with the displaced 81,739 patients treated in the Sutton hospital’s Accident and Emergency department annually.

With London’s birth rate booming, it’s hard to pinpoint where space will be found without great expense for the mothers and babies moved out of St Helier. Last year, 3,317 babies were born in the St Helier maternity unit.

You can’t see the privately funded Portland, with its royal patronage, or the St John’s Wood Wellington being able to expand their maternity services so much as to meet the Coalition government’s desires to privatise child birth.

The cuts in public spending and reduced cap on NHS spending that Liberal Democrat and Conservative MPs voted for is now having an impact back at home in the constituencies. This will make for a particularly uncomfortable coming months for Paul Burstow, the LibDem MP for Sutton and Cheam and a junior minister in the ConDem government … in the health department.

The caring side of Sutton MP Paul Burstow, on a visit to the wards at St Helier. Yet as a ConDem government health minister, Burstow is presiding over the closure of the same hospital’s A&E and maternity departments

The opposition to the plans to close much-needed A&E and maternity departments quickly gathered pace last night, with Kevin O’Brien, the secretary of the Sutton and Merton TUC, stating emphatically, “This has got nothing to do with ‘Better Services Better Value’. This is about massive cuts, cuts and more cuts. The Liberal Democrats have sold their souls to the Tory Devil.”

Frustrated by the previous successful campaign by south London MPs – including LibDems Brake and Burstow – in the last parliament against an earlier plan to “rationalise” south-west London’s NHS, this time around, government ministers and NHS administrators conspired to keep the issue away from the politicians by setting up this panel to recommend one A&E and one maternity unit closure. No blood would stick to politicians’ hands they hoped, and this time closures might be achieved.

It was St Helier that got the black spot.

Good news for Mayday? Not really. Mayday A&E, already struggling to cope, will have to take up much of the slack if St Helier closes. Mainly, this is about concentrating south-west London health services in traffic gridlocked Tooting at St George’s, to the disadvantage of both Croydon’s and Sutton’s hospitals.

Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust says it is going to fight the closures.

The Nursing Times was last night reporting a prospective legal challenge through a judicial review. This will add to the public money already squandered by Croydon Council on a legal challenge to the scoring process.

The LibDem candidate for London Mayor, Brian Paddick, campaigning at St Helier last month with Abigail Lock and Tom Brake (right), with junior health minister Paul Burstow (left)

It was also notable that this decision came out less than a week after the London elections were done and dusted, with Boris Johnson safely re-elected as Mayor.

Not much attention was given in the recent election campaign to London Assembly Member Steve O’Connell’s Conservative-run Croydon Council going to court to try to force St Helier’s closure, rather than Mayday’s.

There has been a lot of duplicity from politicians on this issue.

They are pleased that this is being dealt with at arm’s length.

Croydon Central’s MP, Gavin Barwell, had Andrew Lansley, now the senior government health minister, down to Mayday before the General Election in 2010. Lansley promised that the south-west London review to rationalise local NHS services would be dropped. After the election, Barwell boasted that the new government had dropped the review plans at Lansley’s instruction.

How does that promise and boast look this morning?

Burstow, though, looks to be in an even more untenable position as far as his Sutton and  Cheam constituents are concerned. He is actually working in the Whitehall department that is pursuing these plans to concentrate services more remotely from patients.

Burstow has the bedside manner to be a good health minister. He continues to pretend that he is campaigning against his own department’s rationalisation of south-west London’s NHS. When not being a government minister for health, he has behaved in a way that psychiatrists would identify as being schizophrenic, writing as a local MP to NHS bosses asking them to protect St Helier.

Tom Brake (left), Sean Brennan, the Sutton council leader, and Paul Burstow, earnestly campaigning to save St Helier

He even braved the chilly St Helier hilltop winter winds this year with Brake and the retiring leader of Liberal Democrat-controlled Sutton Council, Sean Brennan, to hold the letters SOS outside the doomed hospital. As on so many occasions in the past couple of years, ConDem government MPs boasted that the money to rebuild St Helier promised under the previous Labour administration was still safe.

The Liberal Democrats had even had the hubris to declare victory for their campaign for the hospital in the June after the Coalition was set up in May 2010.

This was just months after Labour’s Siobhain McDonagh MP had also posed outside the hospital with her banners. At least she got the initial promise £219 million from Gordon Brown to rebuild the place.

The recent collapse of the proposed merger between the managing trusts for St George’s and St Helier left the Sutton hospital exposed, and the Labour MP railed at doctors who decided not to go ahead with the merger. This spat underlined how the Coalition, through the Conservative belief in “market-driven solutions” to the NHS – in plain language, handing over NHS services to private, profit-making companies – were allowing politicians to be removed from the process of deciding local health provision.

Before the General Election, Brake spoke about how the “priority must be St Helier Hospital”. His website described the MP as “Tom Brake, who has campaigned passionately for the future of St Helier Hospital”. Residents were asked to add their name to the LibDem petition to “Save Our St Helier”.

For the LibDems in Sutton, “victory” over closures at St Helier appears to be as much an illusion as having any power in the Conservative-led government at Westminster

Now, it appears that Brake is less effective in representing his constituents’ interests when part of a Conservative-led government, than he was when sitting on opposition benches during a Labour-run administration.

At Prime Minister’s Questions, Brake asked David Cameron for a re-assurance about the £219 million for St. Helier. Assurance there was none.

Brake did, though, get a letter from his Liberal Democrat friend Danny Alexander, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, saying that the money was still available.

Don’t hold your breath though. It looks like curtains for St Helier’s A&E and maternity units, so the Treasury will undoubtedly rake back much of the promised money.

What you can count on though is campaigns by the Health Minister Burstow, along with Tom Brake, against Burstow’s health department’s very own cuts.

Will these campaigns really have any credibility?

  • Inside Croydon: Living life on the fringes of Croydon. Post your comments on this article below. If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, email us at

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Boris Johnson, Gavin Barwell, Health, Mayday Hospital, Mayor of London, Paul Burstow MP, St Helier Hospital, Steve O'Connell, Sutton Council, Tom Brake MP and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to St Helier decision puts Sutton MP Burstow on the spot

  1. I wonder what the people who voted for the LibDems will now say about the cuts?

    The same LibDems who want to build an incinerator near people. Are they glutton for punishment?

    I am not. Mayday is already struggling. Can it cope with an influx of patients from Sutton?

  2. Two points of correction for this article.

    The quote from Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust contains two errors. There were no Councillors on the scoring panel and there are six boroughs in SW London, Croydon, Sutton, Merton, Kingston, Wandsworth and Richmond.

    • We are grateful to Councillor Cummings for highlighting the inaccuracy in the Trust’s statement.

      Clearly they were confused, because according to a letter to this week’s Sutton Guardian from Dr Howard Freeman, Dr David Finch and Mr Michael Bailey, the joint medical directors of Better Services Better Value, “all councils were given a place” on the panel, and it was “up to them who they nominate”.

      Perhaps Councillor Cummings can clarify whether Croydon Council was offered a place on the panel, and if so explain the reason why that place – and the chance to influence the decision – was turned down.

    • Curiouser and curiouser.
      NHS SW London has contacted us, saying: “Each council had a rep on the scoring panel, chosen by the council. All attended.”

      So was Councillor Cummings mistaken?

  3. This is a serious reduction in the healthcare availiable within convenient travel time of Sutton and the environs of St Helier.

    It is always dressed up in terms of economy and efficiency, but once it has gone it is gone and will not come back.

    It is becoming very difficult to find out what exactly the Liberal Democrats are moderating in real material terms for people and their purpose in continuing in coalition.

  4. Please keep me posted on this so we can fight it if need be

  5. ”Curiouser and curiouser.
    NHS SW London has contacted us, saying: “Each council had a rep on the scoring panel, chosen by the council. All attended.”

    So was Councillor Cummings mistaken?”

    No. Surely this can’t be too difficult to follow.

    The article said there were COUNCILLORS on the panel. I pointed out that there were not.
    How can anyone be confused by that?

  6. Pingback: Welcome to Sutton and Cheam Labour | Sutton Labour

Leave a Reply