Social cleansing of town centre underway with council survey

As they begin the process of “cleansing” the town centre ahead of the arrival of that consumerist’s wet dream, Hammersfield, Croydon’s Labour-run council wants to clear the streets of  drug-dealers and prostitutes, charity fund-raisers, cyclists and skateboarders. PETER UNDERWOOD reports

Westfield's preliminary drawings for how they want to change Croydon

The Hammersfield vision of the future, delivered by Croydon Council: no druggies, no prostitutes, no street drunks… and no cyclists

You will probably not have heard of it but Croydon Council is conducting another one of its poorly publicised consultation exercises. This time they are “consulting” over the introduction of a Public Spaces Protection Order, or PSPO.

A PSPO allows local authorities to start issuing fines to anyone doing anything that they don’t like and make these activities a criminal offence. Croydon Council has decided that there are too many people doing things they don’t like in the centre of Croydon and so they want to introduce a PSPO.

The area where it would be applied is extensive, from Northcote Road in the north, to South Croydon rail station in the south, and from Wandle Park in the west to Cherry Orchard Road in the east. And at the heart of it all is the current Whitgift Centre, Centrale and North End, which over the next three to four years is due to be redeveloped by Westfield and Hammerson.

Let’s look at the sorts of things the Council wants to stop.

First on the list is “street drinking/consuming alcohol”. While this category is very loosely worded (they all are), I don’t think that Croydon Council is going to start fining people for sipping a cocktail sitting outside Boxpark. I don’t think they are really going after the people standing outside pubs having a fag or even people opening a bottle of wine with their picnic in Wandle Park.

No, I suspect their target is those other people having a drink in the park or on one of the benches in central Croydon. You know the ones, the people who can’t afford the bars and the restaurants, the people who have nowhere else other than the street to drink because they have nowhere else to go. Croydon Council has clearly decided that just ignoring homeless people isn’t enough; it must now get rid of them. Not by offering them housing or support, but by issuing fines to people who we already know have no money.

What about some of the other soon to be banned categories? Surprisingly, Croydon Council has decided that it wants the power to issue fines to people involved in “drug dealing and/or drug use” and “prostitution related activity”.

First, this runs contrary to the view of many people involved in dealing with drug abuse who now think that treating drug use as a criminal issue instead of a health one is counterproductive. That is also the view of many organisations, including Amnesty International, who argue that criminalising sex work is bad for everyone involved.

The categories of behaviour which Labour-run Croydon Council wants to fine

The categories of behaviour which the Labour-run Croydon Council wants to be able to fine

But perhaps more obviously, don’t we already have laws about drugs and prostitution? If people ignore the laws that already exist, why should Croydon Council think that having the power to issue fines is going to make any difference? And why should they be issuing fines, instead of following the established and proper legal process?

So who else does the council have its sights on? People who are “rowdy and/or inconsiderate”, which probably applies to us all at some point in our lives and virtually everyone in the centre of Croydon on a Friday or Saturday night. We also have “people who are acting in a manner which may cause alarm or distress”. Note the use of the word “may”. You don’t actually have to be alarming anyone or causing distress to anyone or have any intention of doing so, but if some official thinks you “may” be doing so, then you could be liable for a fine and a criminal record.

The more I look at the list of categories the council has put forward, the more it just looks like some official – or Westfield executive? – has written down a list of things they don’t like and wants to get them all banned.

If the council can ban things they don’t like, can I add some more of my own? Can I make it a criminal offence to keep on sniffing instead of using a handkerchief? How about a fine for anyone using the word “wozlike” when they should have used “said”? And men who wear brown shoes with a blue suit: that should be stopped right away.

I know that my petty niggles and prejudices shouldn’t be turned into laws and I don’t want anyone else’s to be either. Public spaces are for the public to use and this means that you get to see and hear the general public in all their wonderful diversity. You may not like what everybody does but I would much rather have a colourful, vibrant, if occasionally irritating, Croydon than the uniform Stepford-wife world promised by the march of these PSPOs to regulate our daily lives.

Some of you may think that bringing in PSPO and its fines is a good idea. I would first point out that the PSPO only applies in the centre of Croydon (the area around the new Westfield development). Even if the fines are effective, all they will do is move the people elsewhere. So any activity you don’t want to see in the centre of Croydon would now be more likely to turn up on your street, or where you work, or outside your children’s school.

The final page of the consultation asks if there is any other behaviour that you want added to the list. This is open-ended. Council officials may start by fining the homeless, the drug users, the prostitutes and the skateboarders, but if that revenue source dries up they can just keep adding more things to the banned list. If you believe that you live such a colourless, bland and uneventful life that nobody could find a reason to fine you, I should point out that the rest of us could get together and campaign to get “People who are dull and boring” added to the PSPO list as well.

So I would ask you all to complete the consultation and point out to the Council that they shouldn’t be wasting their time and our money on adding more regulations to our lives. It would be great if we all got on with each other and never irritated anyone but “not being lovely in a public place” shouldn’t be a criminal offence.

Peter UnderwoodPeter Underwood, left, is the chairman of the Croydon and Sutton Green Party. He has written this article in a personal capacity

Inside Croydon: Named among best regional media campaigns, 2014.

  • Croydon’s only independent news source, based in the heart of the borough: 729,297 page views in 2014.
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at


About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in "Hammersfield", Boxpark, Crime, Croydon Council, Environment, Peter Underwood, Tony Newman, Whitgift Centre and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Social cleansing of town centre underway with council survey

  1. It is interesting to see how different consultations get very different levels of publicity (think of the 20mph zone attached to most lamposts in North Croydon!)

    I think it’s really positive that the council are consulting on this – and I hope the results are widely published. It’s really important to have an proper debate on what people want to see going on in the town centre. One person’s ‘vitality’ is the next persons ‘annoyance’.

    My personal view is that some better management wouldn’t go amiss. I often find myself choosing to visit a Westfield because they’re clean and free from excessive levels of chugging and loud religious preaching, but I’m sure others on here have different views.

  2. lodgersite says:

    Excellent article. I’ve completed the consultation, though no doubt the Council will go ahead and implement these measures. “Consultations” are simply a rubber stamping exercise – a fig leaf of legality, and it seems the only option to overturn Council decisions is via an expensive judicial review.

  3. Excellent article and I am sure that inside Hammersfield, if it ever opens and manages to let a significant proportion of its shops, there will be peace and order. Outside it will be just the same, ineffective and useless consultation and subsequent legislation taken into account. The consultation and the proposed orders are not entirely dissimilar to the situation in my garden. I have placed many notices prohibiting the presence of slugs, snails and, latterly in very fecund mode, foxes. None have had the slightest effect whatsoever. Neither will any orders arising from the so called consultation.

  4. Pingback: Addiscombe Ward – Croydon Town Centre Public Space Protection Order survey | East Croydon Community Organization - ECCO

  5. Pingback: PSPOs: the new control orders threatening our public spaces | Expressivus

  6. Pingback: PSPOs: the new control orders threatening our public spaces -

Leave a Reply