Trustees abandon free school plan for Crystal Palace Park

Controversial plans to build a free school in the middle of a Grade II-listed public park have been abandoned.

Despite the Free School's website featuring several pictures of pupils in their uniform around the NSC and park, the chair of governors expressed surprise that their scheme was included in the consultation

How the Crystal Palace Primary School jumped the gun by publicising its offer with model pupils posing by the doomed athletics stadium

The Crystal Palace Primary School wanted the public to pay for its buildings in the middle of the south London park, as part of the development scheme put forward for London Mayor Boris Johnson by a company run by former Olympic chief Lord Coe, and which will have required the demolition of the athletics stadium, teaching pool, indoor training area and other sports facilities.

But today, trustees of the school – which originally planned to open its gates this month to a first-year entry of five-year-olds – released this statement:

“The Trustees of the proposed Crystal Palace Primary School announce with deep regret that, owing to the lack of availability of a viable site in a suitable location, they have decided to withdraw from the free schools’ programme. We have asked the department to advise us if a suitable site becomes available in the future.

“The school will therefore not be opening in September 2016 and events have been cancelled with immediate effect. This includes all planned family days and open evenings.

“The Trustees would like to thank the Crystal Palace community for their support since the inception of this project and wish all 2016 parents the best of luck in finding a school of their choice.”

Thing is, many in the Crystal Palace community, sport centre users and Tory-run Bromley Council, opposed the scheme to build in the park on a range of grounds, including the loss of sporting amenity and the inappropriate nature of locating a school within the public park.

Someone at the top of Anerley Hill told Inside Croydon: “Proposals for the school to be part of the Crystal Palace National Sports Centre redevelopment caused a lot of local controversy and alternative locations have not managed to get any traction.

“But a reduction in demand for primary school places in the area may have been another important issue: in August, Lambeth got planning permission to turn Paxton Primary off Gipsy Hill from one-form entry to three-form entry.

“There is a down-scaling of primary place projections across south London and other local primaries in the Crystal Palace area, which were perceived to be struggling, have upped their game.”

Without the school trustees pushing for their plot of parkland, the other proposals for the park may now undergo urgent re-evaluation. Bromley’s management agreement with Greenwich Leisure to run the park’s sports facilities expires at the end of March 2016.

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood, Crystal Palace Community Association, Crystal Palace Park, Education, Schools and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Trustees abandon free school plan for Crystal Palace Park

  1. farmersboy says:

    They might have added to the statement: “But thanks to a lack of demand for hotels and apartments in Crystal Palace we feel we’ll no longer have the financial backers.”

  2. whitgiftavenue says:

    A case of putting all their eggs in one basket. If they had explored other possible locations, not just a Grade II listed public park, the school may well have been open by now. It would be interesting to know why they were so sure that they would be given a site in the Park. For years their promotional material had included photos of smiling ‘pupils’, wearing the schools uniform, working and playing in the Park. Was this just unwise presumption on their part, or had the GLA told them that there would be no problem getting a chunk of the Park? Someone in City Hall had clearly been encouraging them.

Leave a Reply