Developers don’t know what to call their £1.4bn supermall

They want to spend £1,400,000,000 demolishing and rebuilding much of the town centre, to build 1,000 “luxury apartments”, a car park for eager shoppers with 3,000 bays, and they are still promising 5,000 jobs (though they remain vague about exactly what kind of jobs these might be). But the developers behind the Croydon Partnership still can’t come up with a name for their long-promised supermall.

One of Westfield's imagined views of how the new mall might look: much of this area will be closed off for building works for three years - beginning now in 2016

An imagined view of how the supermall. Except now, they want to stick a concrete box of a car park over most of the lit walkways

Because of the slightly involved nature of the partnership between shopping centre rivals Hammerson and Westfield, it has been confirmed that they won’t be able to call it “Westfield”.

Which is something that could undermine the longer term prospects of the gargantuan scheme, since one of the great advantages of the redevelopment when it was first sold to Croydon by Boris Johnson and his sarf London bestie, gaffe-prone Gavin Barwell, was the pulling power of the Westfield brand.

In truth, this has been an issue ever since 2013, when Johnson came to Croydon to announce the shot-gun marriage of covenience to short-circuit a Mexican stand-off over the property ownership between the developers. Which is why we have generously and steadfastly offered “Hammersfield” as an appropriate, over-sized, bastardised moniker.

And perhaps the developers’ highly paid “creatives” aren’t too worried, since they still have a long time to ponder their options, with the initial 2017 opening date having been set back repeatedly and is now reckoned to be, at the most optimistic, still more than four years away.

The Mall With No Name is one of a number of important snags that are gradually coming to light since the Croydon Partnership revealed their revised and enlarged plans for the town centre last month.

The developers confirmed at a planning committee meeting last week, “Now there is a 50:50 partnership, we can’t call it the Westfield Centre.” They did seem to suggest that the centre’s title would include the word “Croydon” when they were pressed on the matter by the planning committee chair, Paul Scott.

Hammersfield have appointed an east London-based architects practice, Spacehub, to take charge of designing how the public areas of North End and George Street will look. Spacehub’s previous work includes The Goodsyard at Shoreditch (for Hammerson) and they have also worked on Cairo Place, next to Reeve’s Corner (for Guildhouse, one of the other big players in central Croydon).

Having been given the Hammersfield gig, Spacehub have made the sort of vacuous, hipster commentary that followers of this kind of thing have come to know and loathe:

“A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to transform the public realm in a key part of Croydon.”

“The design principles are based on the prioritisation of pedestrians and cyclists and a rationalisation of the existing public realm.” Yes, their plans include cycling, despite efforts being made elsewhere to have cyclists banned from using North End.

“Key elements include the humanising of Wellesley Road…”.

Despite the whole project having been granted planning permission once, it is fair to say that Spacehub’s plans for the public areas of central Croydon are, at present, a little sketchy…

Spacehub Croydon Westfield sketch

Though at least Spacehub call the project “Westfield Croydon”.

The sketchiness of the architects’ work reflects the lack of firm detail about so much of the revised plans, despite Hammersfield having been working on this already for more than three years, going through one planning process and a Compulsory Purchase Order tribunal, and spending £300 million.

There is to be a public exhibition to display the far-from-complete plans in the Whitgift Centre next week, from May 12 to May 15, while the developers are expected in front of the planning committee again in June.

Perhaps by then they will have filled in some of the many blanks in their painting-by-numbers plans?


About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in "Hammersfield", Business, Centrale, Paul Scott, Whitgift Centre and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Developers don’t know what to call their £1.4bn supermall

  1. timbartell says:

    Gav walked into a shopping mall with no name it felt to be good to be out of the rain,in the commons where no one remembers his name for there’s plenty that will give you a pain.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Lovely drawing, pretty accurate: the empty people are protesting already! Some possible names: Hammer House of Horror, Field of Ridiculous Dreams… many come to mind.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. croydonres says:

    How about Croaky Mc Crocus ?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. farmersboy says:

    The artist has obviously been to Croydon – there’s a bloke jumping off the left hand tower whilst someone else climbs up it, you can see people through the tree on the left and it appears that there’s a mermaid sat on the bench

    Liked by 1 person

  5. joeycan says:

    I look at this spacehub drawing and immediately see the previous Conservative administration’s influence with all the trees looking “Pollarded”. Returning to the ‘Space’ theme I see a worrying correlation with the ‘freeway down which our intrepid hero Luke Skywalker sped to ruin Bath Vapours’s day on the Death Star, and wonder could this be the death of shopping as we know it in Croydon?

    Like

  6. derekthrower says:

    How about the “Never Really Happened” Mall ? You walk around the old Whitgift Centre in a pair of 3D Goggles and listen to a commentary about what is going to be there and what is going to be here and can go back in 3 months time and listen to another commentary about what should have been there and should have been here.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s