Council’s commitment to cycling is only a virtual reality

After spending at least £300,000 in three years on staging the under-sponsored Croydon CycleFarce road races around the town centre, the council’s “commitment” to encouraging cycling in the borough remains only a virtual reality.

Now you see it, now you don’t: £6,000 was spent on a pair of bike racks in South Croydon, which now only exist as part of the Pokemon Go! game

As Tony Newman, Jo Negrini and other Town Hall figures pat themselves on the back and sip their cheap Prosecco in the VIP tent during the bike races this evening, the irony of the location of the start and finish area on the High Street will be lost on them. For it is on a stretch of road where council works have managed to eliminate an established cycle lane.

Another sign of the lip service to cycling by Croydon Council is the fate of a pair of specially commissioned bike racks just up the road, on South End, which cost tax-payers more than £6,000 but which now, according to Croydon Council, languish unused – unwanted? – on a building site.

In fact, the only evidence that these bike racks were ever installed is in virtual reality. Last year’s smart phone craze, Pokemon Go!, has one of the bike racks as a point-scoring Pokestop, even though it doesn’t actually exist at the location, after it was removed by council contractors barely a year after it was installed.

And irony of ironies, the bike racks were “branded” in the colours of the council’s “Connected Croydon” scheme – the series of roadworks which managed to obliterate the cycle lanes on Croydon High Street, to be replaced by more car parking bays.

And these were the specially designed, vastly over-priced bike racks, made in the shape of a car, which were meant to illustrate that in the space on a single parked car, 10 bicycles can be racked up. Ahhh, if only the council roads department had managed to absorb and understand the message themselves.

According to a Freedom of Information response from the council, the bike racks were paid for in part from the Mayor’s Riot Recovery Fund and partly from Transport for London’s Local Implementation Plan. The work was carried out in 2014-2015.

“This included the design, construction and installation of a bicycle rack, which was positioned outside what was then a branch of Lloyd’s Bank,” the council’s FoI response states.

“Two CycleHoop temporary cycle racks were installed in June 2014, one outside Zizzi, which was moved to outside what was then a branch of Lloyd’s Bank. This was not financed through the South End project budget but from Transport for London LIP money designated to On-Street Cycle Storage, which would have otherwise been returned to TfL.

“The aim was to provide cycle parking during construction of South End and other Connected Croydon High Streets projects in a form that could be permanently located in the borough subsequently, while promoting Connection Croydon when in use.”

No through road: this is what was left of a cycle lane on the High Street

The council does not elaborate on why there was only a temporary need for cycle storage in the area. But it demonstrates once again that, like so many aspects of the DisConnected Croydon project, this was another triumph for style over substance.

According to the council, the two bike racks each cost £2,200 (including VAT), plus £190 each for delivery and installation.

None of this procurement or price negotiation is recorded in any correspondence, the council says, because, “Arrangements with this local supplier for a one-off purchase were made by phone.” Cushty.

The bike racks were removed almost as soon as the Connected Croydon roadworks were completed. Perhaps it was a reflection that, with the cycle lanes on that stretch of road effectively removed, there would no longer be any cyclists visiting the shops nearby. “The moves were instructed within the Connected Croydon programme, as and when temporary cycle storage was required.” So cycling was not considered by the council to be a long-term option, then…

The FoI response also provided details of what has happened to Croydon’s true attitude to citizen cycling for the other 364 days of the year when Tony Newman is not basking in the dim glow of an ITV4 camera light.

“Since their removal the two Car Bike Ports have been kept at the Connected Croydon materials compound on the Taberner House site,” the council response advises.

“The Strategic Transport team has identified a number of potential locations and received a quote for removing the Connected Croydon branding, which is no longer used…”, which amounts to £350, for each rack, for the paint-spray job, “and re-installing them,” which would cost another £900 for the pair.

“The re-use of the Car Bike Ports is being fitted into a wider programme to install local public cycle storage, paid for using TfL LIP and Section 106 Sustainable Transport funding. So suggestions for alternative locations for the ‘car bike port lite’ or other form of cycle storage appropriate for each location will be given serious consideration.”

So, if you would like to tell council leader where to stick the over-priced and under-used bike racks, send an email to

If you send it today, he should be able to read it on his council-funded smart phone while filling his face with canapes at the Croydon CycleFarce.

  • Inside Croydon is Croydon’s only independent news source, still based in the heart of the borough. In 2016, we averaged 17,000 page views every week
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Connected Croydon, Croydon Council, Cycling, Cycling, TfL, Tony Newman and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Council’s commitment to cycling is only a virtual reality

  1. blath8 says:

    I remember those car-shaped bike racks – nearly fell off my bike laughing when I realised what they actually were.
    To my mind, a better use of funds to help cyclists (and therefore motorists) would be to build up the sunken drain covers and fill in the pot-holes close to the kerbs so that cyclists don’t have to either a) swerve out into the traffic to avoid them or b) cycle across them and risk being thrown off the bike or getting a puncture.
    Not that I’m all that keen to go cycling in the pouring rain as it’s that much harder to spot these nasty little dangers on the wet roads ….. that’s my excuse and I’m sticking to it!

  2. Lewis White says:

    Sorry to sound a negative note about cycling as a mass transport mode, but in much of Croydon, our hills are so big that cycling is only suitable for the keen leisure cyclist, the lycra-clad person, typically a thin male.

    In the flatter parts, yes, using a bike to go shopping can make sense, but the stonkingly big hills of Coulsdon, Purley, Kenley, Sanderstead, Addington, Selsdon, and Upper Norwood are far too steep to cycle up. It’s not exactly Holland.

    We therefore need some reality about the cycling provision–where it makes sense, and how many racks.
    Bike lockers are very useful for residents who have bikes but live in flats. Quite a few can be bought for the large amount spent on the poorly-publicised and supported bike race.

Leave a Reply