Cyclists call on Mayor to apply his own policies at Purley Way

TfL wants to spend the thick-end of £100m on making one of Croydon’s busiest road junctions even more hostile for pedestrians and cyclists, all to satisfy developers Westfield. AUSTEN COOPER says the road plans are ‘a patchwork of good, poor and downright dangerous’

Transport for London is consulting on their plans for Fiveways junction, the part of Croydon where the Purley Way and the A232 intersect.

Fiveways on the Purley Way: £87m of new roads will not solve the traffic problems

TfL says it aims to:

  • Improve road safety
  • Create better conditions for pedestrians and cyclists
  • Support growth in Croydon
  • Improve journey times
  • Create new public spaces to develop Waddon as a local centre

Specifically, TfL says that the proposals would make, “Fiveways junction simpler and increase capacity to accommodate expected traffic growth arising from population and economic growth in the area.”

These claims don’t stand up to scrutiny.

The population of London has grown by around 20 per cent since 2000. But motor traffic levels during that period of population growth have fallen. In Croydon, according to Department for Transport data, it has declined by 16 per cent since 2000.

For example, the bridge over the railway at Waddon – which TfL wants to widen at huge public cost – shows a decline of around 15 per cent since 2000 in the “average annual daily traffic flow” of all motor vehicles – motorcycles, cars, taxis, buses, vans and lorries. Average Annual Daily Flow figures give the number of vehicles that will drive on that stretch of road on an average day of the year.

According to the DfT, traffic levels in Croydon have fallen since 2000

According to the TfL spokesperson at Croydon Council’s most recent cycle forum, there is “no demand” for cycling on the Purley Way.

However, the DfT data shows that there was one class of road user which actually increased by 11 per cent since 2000 – and that’s cyclists.

So, it is quite wrong of TfL to say that population growth and motor traffic growth go hand-in-hand.

The real reason that TfL and Croydon Council want to “improve” Fiveways is what they euphemistically describe as “economic growth in the area”. Everyone knows that this is code for Westfield, the international retail development company, who have grand designs to replace the Whitgift shopping centre in central Croydon.

Indeed, in July 2012, Steve O’Connell, the Conservative London Assembly Member for Croydon and Sutton asked the then Mayor, Boris Johnson, this loaded question: “It is vital, as we say, that the wallet share is not stopped coming into Croydon by transport difficulties, particularly the wallet share of north Surrey.

“Mr Mayor, can you confirm that you agree that it is crucial?”

But is it true that, despite the fall in motor traffic on Croydon’s roads, that replacing the Whitgift with a Westfield would reverse that drop?

At White City, where Westfield’s first London supermall was opened in 2008, there has been a decline in motor traffic in that borough (Hammersmith and Fulham) since 2000, and in particular, since 2008. According to government figures.

What if TfL goes ahead anyway and re-builds Fiveways to enable more people to drive cars to and through these junctions? As numerous studies have pointed out, most notably by Parliament’s Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessments in 1994, we then have the problem of “induced traffic”. When a new road is built, new traffic will divert on to it. Many people may make new trips they would otherwise not make, and will travel longer distances just because of the presence of the new road. TfL still use outdated predict-and-provide computer models to justify their extravagant use of public money to build roads that generate the motor traffic they said it would; it’s the very opposite of a virtuous circle, but it keeps them employed.

This increase in cars going through Fiveways might be great for Westfield (if it ever gets built), but it’s not great for Croydon’s transport network, since it will have an impact on other roads, not just the A23 and A232. And of course, it will be bad for our environmental health.

Statistics compiled by King’s College London show that Croydon town centre’s air quality has long been in breach of EU safety limits. Encouraging and enabling more people to drive into an air pollution hot spot is not going to help at all.

But the government, TfL and Croydon Council don’t appear to be bothered, despite the threat of legal action.

Croydon Council’s draft Air Quality Action Plan for the next five years states that, “Croydon is meeting all of the national Air Quality Strategy objectives other than for the gas nitrogen dioxide (NO2).”

Data and mapping show high and illegal levels of NO2 in the approach to Fiveways, which TfL wants to expand, and Wellesley Road, where they want to route this increase in motor traffic towards Westfield.

TfL’s Purley Way scheme includes a new road bridge over the railway lines at Waddon Station, but “a patchwork of good, poor and downright dangerous facilities” for cyclists

The council Action Plan acknowledges that “of the pollution that originates in the borough the main sources of NO2 are road transport at 60 per cent …”. There is no plan to reduce motor traffic, despite what it is doing to people locally and to the planet through climate change.

What of the plans for Fiveways and their impact on cycling? They are fragmented, parochial, in some cases non-existent. They provide a patchwork of good, poor and downright dangerous facilities.

They fail to acknowledge the existence of attractions like Waddon Ponds, Waddon Leisure Centre and the new Harris school. It is a paradox that TfL’s plans are based on enabling out-of-towners to drive from the M25 into Croydon, while not helping local people walk or cycle conveniently and safely to the park, gym or school, to the railway station or local shops.

TfL say they will make it easier to cycle from west – Beddington – to east – Waddon. In itself, this is welcome, but the eastern approach to this improvement is via a half-baked cycle path that disappears about 900 feet short of the junction with Purley Way and ends on the wrong side of the road.

What TfL has effectively ignored is how people get back from east to west.

Their plans show people cycling up a dedicated cycle path along Epsom Road, from the Waddon Hotel towards the junction with the Purley Way. What they don’t address is how to get to that cycle path. As things stand, anyone cycling from Croydon will most likely have to emerge from the part of Epsom Road at the junction (as shown in the picture below, and make their way into the middle lane occupied by the two vans).

Even experienced cyclists say ‘on yer bike’ to the idea of navigating Fiveways, as TfL is suggesting

This means trying to cross the east and west bound lanes of the A232, hard enough if you’re driving a bus or a car, but very uncomfortable and difficult if you’re on a bike and competing for road space with motor vehicles going up and down Duppas Hill Road.

Now you see it, now you don’t: cycle lanes were included in earlier plans for Stafford Road…

Similarly, cycling from central Croydon towards Fiveways itself is not going to be made any easier. The original TfL plans showed segregated cycle lanes. Their re-jigged drawings show the cycle lane replaced with part-road, part-footpath car parking spaces.

The sanitised images provided by TfL of their vision for Fiveways junction reveals that anyone cycling from Croydon to Wallington or vice versa is going to be given only advanced stop lines to help them across. But these ASL usually look an awful lot like the HGV blind spots that safety advisers tell cyclists to avoid.

… but don’t exist in TfL’s latest version, replaced by car parking spaces

Cycling across Fiveways to or from Wallington will still mean competing with cars and trucks.

The North-South routing along the Purley Way is not going to be much changed.

While a cyclist struggling to get home without being killed would have the option of riding legally on the pavement towards Fiveways, their return journey will not be improved and they’ll still have to compete with trucks and lorries. TfL glibly dismissed cyclists’ safety considerations here on the grounds of expense.

So, what would make Fiveways better?

The Croydon Cycling Campaign is calling on TfL and Croydon Council to insist on the very best design processes and standards as detailed in… ahem… TfL’s own London Cycling Design Standards manual.

We want them to carry out the Cycling Level of Service assessment now, before the consultation closes, rather than hide by red tape and excuses, as explained in their refusal of this Freedom of Information request.

Cycling on the Purley Way is all but impossible at present

We want Croydon Council to insist that TfL design cycle routes to and through the Fiveways junctions that are as good as the best in London and can be used by all cyclists, including those with disabilities. Not our words – theirs, as contained in the borough’s draft Cycling Strategy.

TfL and Croydon Council need to stop paying lip service to cycling and instead start “Delivering the benefits of cycling in outer London”, the publication of the same name published in 2010.

We have all the studies, grand plans and fine words we need.  It’s time to put them into effect, for the benefit of everyone, not just white middle-aged men in lycra on road bikes.

  • TfL’s final public consultation session is tomorrow, September 9 at St George’s on Barrow Road (noon-4pm). The consultation is open for submissions until September 18, and the full documentation can be viewed online at
  • Austen Cooper is a member of the Croydon Cycling Campaign, which is affiliated to the London Cycling Campaign. This is an edited version of an article first published on the campaign’s own website, reproduced here with permission

  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
  • In the five months from April to August 2017, Inside Croydon generated more than 500,000 page views
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Commuting, Croydon Cycling Campaign, Cycling, London-wide issues, Mayor of London, Purley Way, Sadiq Khan, TfL, Transport, Waddon and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Cyclists call on Mayor to apply his own policies at Purley Way

  1. Bob Catt says:

    When cyclists pay road tax and carry insurance they have NO RIGHTS to preferential treatment on any and all public roads. Finish this stupidity NOW !

    • Surely the only stupidity is spending £87million-plus of public money on a road scheme when all data suggests that the usage of that road is diminishing?

      There are no road tax demands on cyclists. I am unaware of any political party having proposed to create road tax for cyclists at the last General Election. Perhaps you should suggest it to the Monster Raving Looneys.

      In any case, it is a myth that road tax is used for our roads. Our roads and traffic infrastructure is paid for out of general taxation, to which the majority of cyclists, and pedestrians, contribute.

      But Bob: do us a favour, and find us the statistics of how many motorists or lorry drivers were killed and maimed in the last 12 months by collisions with bicycles.

      Making roads safer for all road users is good for everyone. Fewer cars on our roads is also good for the whole planet – ask the people of the St Martin, the Turks and Caicos and the British Virgin Islands.

      • sandilands02 says:

        Congestion is a big issue and even a blind person can see the junction is not currently fit for purpose.

        That said I do agree with encouraging cycling esp for local journeys, it’s healthier, less congesting and solves a lot of problems with congestion and parking.

  2. Both your article and Sadiq Khans new propaganda are tying childrens health into knots.Just look at the contradictions, when applied to Fiveways and the new Harris academy:
    When you add council negligence to lying car manufacturers (even their new models) you can kiss goodbye to healthy kids in the next generation.

Leave a Reply