BINMAGEDDON!: Veolia is sending recycling to incinerator

Our environment correspondent, PAUL LUSHION, reports on some shocking revelations from Brighton which illustrate rubbish economics

The Beddington Lane incinerator, with Croydon in the background. It will soon be fully operational

Veolia, the rubbish contractors for Croydon and three other boroughs in the South London Waste Partnership, have been instructing some of their staff to send residents’ recycled waste for incineration.

That’s according to a report in yesterday’s Brighton Argus, in which a Veolia employee blows the whistle on how households’ carefully sorted recycling is being shovelled by the lorry-load towards an incinerator at Newhaven.

The revelation burns a massive hole in the false “environmentally friendly” narrative pursued by Croydon Council and others who have been defending the new Viridor incinerator at Beddington Lane.

“We shouldn’t be surprised, when all the contracts and fees are structured in such a way to make bigger profits for the waste contractors by burning rubbish instead of recycling waste,” said Nick Mattey, the independent councillor in Sutton’s Beddington North ward who has been campaigning against the environmental disaster that is the Viridor incinerator.

“They get £30 per ton for recycled waste, or £120 per ton for waste sent to an incinerator. Of course they’re going to divert as much as they can for incineration.”

Brighton and Hove City Council – once under control of the Green Party – has a waste and recycling contract with Veolia, who also operate the Newhaven incinerator, which was built for the Tory-controlled East Sussex County Council. It has been burning rubbish since 2012.

According to an exclusive in yesterday’s Argus, Veolia has told bin lorry driver Ken Quantick and his three-man crew to tip all their recycling into the household waste facility.

“This means our eight tons of recycling a day is going straight into the incinerator at Newhaven,” the local paper reports Quantick, 71, as saying.

It’s a scandal: bin man, and environmental hero, Ken Quantick. Photo:

“This is a scandal,” Quantick said. “The public need to know what is going on.”

Veolia maintains that it only rejects recycling which has been “contaminated”, while the bin men say that on their round, they have “a very low contamination rate”.

Sutton councillor Mattey says that with Veolia heavily incentivised to send waste to incineration, “it is the easiest thing in the world for them to put a single egg shell on lorry-load of paper recycling and declare it all ‘contaminated’ and fit only for incineration.

“For a single load from an eight-ton lorry, they immediately make an extra £720 for their shareholders if it is incinerated instead of recycled,” Mattey says.

“Multiply that for every lorry, every day of the working week, and apply that across the whole South London Waste Partnership.”

The Argus published photographs from the Sussex depot which shows recycling mixed in with black bin bags. Quantick told the newspaper that his depot is unable to cope with the volume of recycling being collected.

“They are overwhelmed,” he said. “It’s a mountain. They can’t clear it quickly enough. They are using this as an excuse. It’s absolutely disgusting.

“I don’t know what the public is going to think when they find out their recycling is being burned.”

Veolia told the newspaper: “We are a recycling company and we recycle viable material.”

In south London, the Viridor incinerator at Beddington Lane, which has a £1billion contract over 25 years with Croydon, Sutton, Merton and Kingston councils, is still not yet fully operational, though test burns continue to be observed. Veolia recently took on the waste and recycling collections for Sutton and Merton, as well as Croydon.

In Croydon, Stuart Collins, the Labour-run council’s cabinet member for fly-tipping and dirty streets, claims that the borough is aiming to recycle 50 per cent of its waste.

Cllr Nick Mattey: waste companies make more money from incineration than recycling

The evidence, though, suggests that that is just, well… a load of rubbish.

In other areas which have introduced industrial-scale incinerators into their waste management strategy, recycling rates have tended to go down.

In South Wales, recycling rates were at 55 per cent before 2014, when an incinerator at Splott came on-stream. With a voracious appetite for ever more fuel for the incinerator, ever more rubbish, including materials intended to be recycled, was diverted to the furnaces.

The business model for incinerator operators, whether in south London, on the south coast, or in South Wales, is always the same: get rubbish, weigh it, charge it, burn it, and sell the power generated.

If they’re not generating enough heat, then they won’t generate the power that they are contracted to supply.

And for a “recycling company” such as Veolia, who operate what they prefer to call an “Energy from Waste Facility” at Newhaven, or for Viridor at Beddington Lane, the difference in revenues between what is paid for recycling and what is paid for incinerator fuel is sure to see ever more “contaminated” waste sent for incineration.

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Environment, Nick Mattey, Refuse collection, Sutton Council, Veolia, Waste incinerator and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to BINMAGEDDON!: Veolia is sending recycling to incinerator

  1. Lewis White says:

    I am burning….with anger. If we really have to have incineration to dispose of rubbish, it should be SOME rubbish , the small residue after proper, thorough-going recycling for most of the waste . We need –as a matter of urgency– in the UK proper development of after-uses and the making of products using the recycled plastic and other waste.

    We have been exporting our recycled waste for years, and much of this no doubt ends up being dumped in rural areas of China India and Africa, or thrown into rivers.

    They used to say “Where there’s muck , gthere’s brass”. Yes, but that used to refer to making money from sorting and recycling paper, rags, and metal.

    The phrase mainly now means shifting waste in containers to third world places, or burning waste in so-called “energy from waste” facilities like Beddington.

    We have to change our collective ways to waste elimination by , for example, having just a few standard patterns of things like computer plugs and cables, not hundreds, and have sensible packaging that is minimal, and recyclable or biodegradable.

    I am grateful to firms who are doing good things in the packaging of their products, to avoid excess packing, the use of composite materials and elimianting polystyrene, which is the ultimate mystery –a very clean product, that should be reusable , but is not recycled. Why?

    I blame politicians of all parties for the mess we are in.

    Will Michael Gove sort this recycling mess out, along with keeping UK agriculture after Brexit?

Leave a Reply