‘We can’t do business as usual’ says rookie councillor looking to make an impression, writes KEN LEE, our Town Hall reporter
Leila Ben-Hassel, a Croydon councillor only since March 2019, last night announced herself as a fourth contender to become deputy leader of the council.
She joins Alisa Flemming, Manju Shahul-Hammed and Stuart King in a vote among the borough’s 41 Labour councillors to be held tomorrow evening. The election arose after Alison Butler resigned as deputy leader earlier this week.
Ben-Hassel is the only candidate in the election who was not a cabinet member in the increasingly discredited administration of Butler and Tony Newman, something that the Norbury and Pollards Hill ward councillor stresses sets her apart from her rivals.
“We cannot afford to do business as usual,” Ben-Hassel wrote. “Our residents and members deserve better.”
As a newcomer to Croydon politics, Ben-Hassel is relatively untainted by the calamitous mismanagement of the old regime that is now subject to an urgent review by Whitehall. Indeed, on the occasions when she has been asked to chair sessions of the scrutiny committee, her independence of approach and challenging style of questioning has been welcomed by observers and caused discomfort to some of her longer-established council colleagues.
She was elected 18 months ago at a ward by-election following the death of long-standing council figure Maggie Mansell. Ben-Hassel has 16 years experience as a project manager working in public realm planning for the City of London Corporation. She knows how local authorities work from the inside.
She says that she is putting herself forward “not just to be your next deputy leader, but to transform the role itself”.
Referring to the report from auditors Grant Thornton published last Friday, Ben-Hassel wrote: “The Report in the Public Interest has opened the eyes of [the Labour] group to the stark reality that in the next few weeks we will, at best, remain in control of the administration with very limited ability to deliver more than statutory services and, at worst, face government intervention following a Section 114 notice.”
“Like many of you, this breaks my heart and the extent of the issues and challenges raised is far beyond than what most of us imagined.
“Many of us who stood for election in recent years did so with the ambition and belief that we could, and would, make a difference. I feel newer councillors have been robbed of that opportunity and although I accept that covid and austerity cuts have been major contributing factors, the auditors’ reports show that we already faced severe challenges.”
Ben-Hassel says that the current reviews of the council are an “opportunity to completely rethink the way we do things”, and leave “behind the days of complacency, lack of constructive challenge and avoidance of difficult decisions”.
Knowing that her three rivals for deputy leader have all already been given cabinet positions under new leader Hamida Ali, Ben-Hassel’s pitch is that Flemming, Shahul-Hameed and King should not be distracted from their tasks by the (less-than-onerous) duties of being deputy leader. “Now more than ever, we need our cabinet members to be totally focused on their portfolios and not stretched between two roles,” she wrote.
“This new approach will also signal strongly to our residents that we are taking these challenges seriously and bringing in a fresh pair of eyes to broaden the range of voices around the table.”
In an appeal that was full of implicit criticism of the council under Newman and his numpties, Ben-Hassel offers herself as a “bridge” between the previous by-passed backbenchers and the leadership. “This would ensure that we harness the breadth of talent and experience we have on our back benches, and that our [party] members feel listened to.
“If we take anything from the current situation, it must be that plurality of voices and inclusive, collaborative working has to become a key part of our culture. We are stronger together.”
Unusually, Ben-Hassel also offers to forego collecting the full special responsibility allowance as deputy leader, “in line with my values of doing the role as a public service”.
As a Katharine Street source said this afternoon, “The last time a candidate for election to the council offered to set that kind of danngerous precedent, Tony Newman stepped in and had them removed from the nomination process.
“If Leila does well in tomorrow night’s vote, it will be an important break with the Newman past.”
Read more: Newman won’t say sorry, even to colleagues
- 2010 to 2020: Inside Croydon has been delivering local community service and local community news for 10 years. To support independent local journalism in Croydon, please sign up today as a supporter. Click here for more details
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at firstname.lastname@example.org
- Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and BBC London News
- Inside Croydon named Journalist of the Year at 2018 Anna Kennedy Online Autism Heroes Awards
- ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: For three consecutive years, 2017, 2018 and 2019, Inside Croydon has been the source for award-winning nominations in Private Eye magazine’s annual celebration of civic cock-ups
- Inside Croydon had 1.6million pages viewed by 721,000 unique visitors in 2019
Let us not forget that Leila was on the Scrutiny committee – like all others she was weak and didn’t ask the right questions. Who gave BH Live the contract to operate the Fairfield ? Who failed to ask them if they could afford to operate in Croydon? Who failed to ask them to present their plan for operating the hall’s in return for hundreds of thousands of Croydon tax payer money? She was complicit. Forget a new Deputy, Croydon needs proper new leadership and new Directors to advise the Councillors too. Does the Croydon cultural strategy compare to the strategy that BH Live are presenting for Fairfield? Is it right to spend millions of pounds on our local venue only to be given tribute acts and no access to our community assert in return? Leila should not be Deputy leader.
Sorry, David. While we value your insight and expertise on many matters relating to the Fairfield Halls and culture in the borough, on this you are just plain wrong.
Read the article again: Leila Ben-Hassel was only elected to the council in March 2019. That was just a matter of months before the Halls re-opened, by which time the damage had already been done with the ill-managed project. She didn’t join the scrutiny committee until later in 2019 – years after the contract had been awarded to BH Live.
Yes, there may be some issues with the procurement of that operating contract, which needs investigating. Yes, the scrutiny committee looked the other way over the matter. But that was years before Ben-Hassel was even on the council.
Someone needs to delve deeply into this matter, that is agreed. But when holding people responsible for their actions, do try at least to ensure that they were around at the time.
Fully agree IC; if she wasn’t there, then apologies, good luck to her!
I don’t know much about Ben-Hassel but would only point out that in the aftermarth of the complete fuck-up Tony Newman has caused in Croydon, BH should forge a strong alliance with Ali and get a young team of councillors around them and move forward.
Croydon residents will probably support them but they must remove all ties with Newman and the hangers-on who are still there like Butler and Scott. Ben-Hassel and Ali should start by removing Scott from planning (lance the boil on the ass of Croydon).