Chancellor’s Council Tax bombshell: how Budget hits Croydon

Our new columnist ANDREW FISHER, pictured left, looks at what this week’s Budget will mean for Croydon’s residents, businesses and for the services provided by the local authority

Nearly 50,000 households in Croydon receive Universal Credit. The £20 per week cut in UC made by the government earlier this month has therefore taken almost £1million per week out of Croydon’s local economy, and left many of the poorest households more than £1,000 worse off per year.

For those on Universal Credit, this week’s Budget brought some amelioration for people in low-paid work through the cut in the taper rate – the deduction you get in your Universal Credit payment for each additional £1 you earn in work. The taper rate is being cut from 63 per cent to 55 per cent, meaning that after tax and National Insurance deductions, you’ll keep 45p of every £1, rather than 37p.

But most Universal Credit claimants are out of work, and will see no benefit at all.

When we went into lockdown in March 2020, unemployment in the UK was 1.2million. It’s now more than 2million, a 67 per cent increase. In Croydon there were 10,835 unemployed in March 2020.  Today it’s 18,925, a 75 per cent increase.

Tough choices: £20 per week reduction in UC will make life tougher for many in Croydon

People’s energy bills are also about to rise by £139 this year, and an even larger increase is expected in April 2022.

More people with less income means there will be less to spend in local shops, hitting local high streets which are struggling as the pandemic has accelerated the shift to online retail, something which put the final nail in the coffin of the flawed deal to bring Westfield to Croydon town centre. Higher energy bills are also hitting the margins of many retailers.

One small ray of positive news was on the minimum wage, which will rise by 6.6 per cent next year, to £9.50 an hour. The impact of that rise is less significant, though, in the context of inflation, estimated at more than 4 per cent. It contrasts to last year’s minimum wage rise, which at only 2.2 per cent was less than the current rate of inflation (3.1 per cent).

However, with the government is freezing the income tax threshold for five years, so that low-paid workers will pay more income tax on more of their income; the hike in National Insurance contributions will cost a minimum wage worker an extra £115 a year.

Council funding and Council Tax

Another Budget measure that will suppress demand was hidden deep within the small print: a Council Tax bombshell.

Expected Council Tax revenue receipts suggest Council Tax bills will rise by 33 per cent across England by 2026.

For the last few years, the government has been cutting their funding to councils across the country, including Croydon, and telling them to make up the shortfall by hiking Council Tax.

Last year’s 5 per cent rise added more than £70 per year to the average household bill.

Croydon’s council received £58million less in central government funding compared with 2015-2016 – a 40 per cent cut, which is slightly above the average cut across London of 35 per cent.

This year Croydon has to make further cuts of £38million, which is why the council is consulting on proposals to cut Council Tax support for low-income households.

Until 2013, a national scheme called Council Tax Benefit existed, but this was axed and the funding devolved to councils to devise their own schemes. However, the funding given to local authorities to run those schemes is less than the government provided for the national scheme. And the administration costs for Council Tax support now fall on every local authority in England.

Rishi Sunak: Chancellor needs to do some ‘levelling up’ in London

The Local Government Financial Settlement – detailing the level of grants paid by central government to local authorities around the country – is normally published in December. What Croydon should be pushing for is some “levelling up” with our neighbouring London boroughs. While Croydon, with 330,000 residents, got £88million for 2021-2022, next door Lambeth, with fewer residents, received nearly £144million and Westminster (with more than 100,000 fewer residents) received £120million.

Perhaps Croydon South’s Conservative MP could press his Chancellor to practice some of his “levelling up” for Croydon’s hard-pressed residents?

Public services and the NHS

Investment in skills and education is vital if the government genuinely wants to “level up”.

One of the positives of the Budget was the cash to restore per pupil funding to 2010 levels by 2024-2025. But this simply highlights that school pupils for the last decade have had less investment than the previous generation.

Funding boost: education institutions in the borough should benefit from Budget measures

The extra money committed on skills and further education is good news too for Croydon College and the new South Bank University campus in our borough (a genuine success by the Labour-controlled council). Hopefully, the extra funding will help to settle current pay disputes in the sector and give staff at Croydon College a genuine pay rise.

Across the public sector, the Chancellor announced an end to the public sector pay freeze, but did not commit to real terms increases in public sector pay settlements. With inflation about to rise to 4 per cent, any pay rise less than that will mean a real-terms cut in living standards for public sector workers, with knock-on effects on recruitment and retention.

The huge treatment backlogs facing the NHS are a pressing issue – depriving many people waiting for operations of a decent quality of life. There are also increasing delays for people starting cancer treatment.

While the government announced “a £5.9billion capital investment for the NHS to tackle the backlog”, the major issue facing the NHS is a staff shortage – and without solving that, for which there was precious little in the Budget, delays in treatment are unlikely to reduce.

There may be particularly bad news for Croydon’s civil servants – as buried in the Budget documents is a commitment to cut around 30,000 of their jobs, which appears additional to the existing commitment to move 22,000 civil service roles outside London by 2030. What this means for Croydon-based workers at places like Lunar House and Southern House remains to be seen.

What the Budget clearly does mean for Croydon is that whoever becomes the borough’s inaugural directly-elected Mayor next May will face some very big challenges.

Read more: The council’s in a hole, and yet they still keep on digging
Read more: Tory Chancellor scores an own goal with London-lite Budget

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at
  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named the country’s rottenest borough in 2020 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine – the fourth successive year that Inside Croydon has been the source for such award-winning nominations
  • Inside Croydon: 3million page views in 2020. Seen by 1.4million unique visitors

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Andrew Fisher, Business, Council Tax, Croydon Council, Education, LSBU campus and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Chancellor’s Council Tax bombshell: how Budget hits Croydon

  1. John Harvey says:

    When South Bank was announced as Croydon’s new Campus your journal, rather snobbishly attacked this as a low ranking university.

    I had been very proud to see my daughter-in-law recently receive her nursing degree there before starting a NHS career at the town’s main hospital

    Croydon should now be proud to be an area addressing the need to increase the NHS workforce

    I do not know if nurses can still wear silver buckles indicating success during training in hospital (rather than national) examinations. But it might be time for a “Trained in Croydon” medal for new NHS entrants.provided (inter alia) by local schools and businesses.

    • It is not snobbish to state the facts: South Bank University was ranked 95th in the country.

      Tony Newman – remember him? – described it as an “important university”. Are there unimportant universities?

      As low-ranking goes, South Bank is rated puts them behind the likes of the universities of Wolverhampton, Lincoln and Bournemouth.

      According to The Times Higher Education Supplement, even Kingston Poly (at 79th) is higher ranked than South Bank.

      That’s not snobbery. Them’s the facts.

  2. Ian Kierans says:

    People should be proud of their own and family or friends achievement. Croydon could do with good qualified locals working locally who understand what people face in their daily lives. They usually have more empathy and understanding of the hardships leveled at residents in this Borough. The more people South Bank can turn out the quicker the staff shortages might be alleviated.

    The article on this budget was a good one and congratulations to Mr Fisher – may he not get mistaken for the other Fisher.
    Some rankings to take on board are the funding rankings of local boroughs which is interesting.

    But the strange action of our deputy leader – This is like the Mayoral issue all over again. So opposing a Mayor but wanting a Mayor – opposing Cuts yet making Cuts, driving down pollution but adding exponentially by their own decisions to a pollution crisis in the Borough.
    Take a walk from Hogarth Crescent to the Fairfield Halls then come back down the London Road to St James road. The stark differences are amazing but one thing sticks out. As you cross the road from the old Barclays Bank there is a huge pothole and it is roughly the same as the one on Wellington road junction with St James road. That sums up the Executives at this Council. No matter where you are in the Borough or how much you have or have not – they are not working on our behalf at all. Our money was pissed up the wall by successive administrations and frankly before they get anymore there needs to be an open investigation into how and why.

  3. Christopher Myers says:

    Well well! I never thought I’d see the word ‘amelioration’ in IC! Clearly you’re appealing to a more intellectual demographic.

Leave a Reply