LibDem leader accused of ‘putting two fingers up’ to residents

Our Sutton Council reporter, BELLE MONT, on how the pressure is mounting on the LibDems’ leadership

Time running out: ‘Calamity’ Jayne McCoy has failed to respond to the calls for her to resign

Sutton Council’s opposition Tories are demanding that “Calamity” Jayne McCoy, the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrat-controlled council, should resign from her role as chair of the housing, economy and business committee, from where she has presided over the multi-million failed council heating network, SDEN.

McCoy is accused of lying to councillors and residents and being “happy to put two fingers up to taxpayers and residents” over the misfiring heating system, which has caused anguish and increased energy costs for those unfortunate enough to be tied in to a monopoly supply deal at the New Mill Quarter development in Hackbridge.

The call was made at a council meeting on Monday night by Catherine Gray, the Conservatives’ lead member on the HEB, who followed it up with a letter sent to McCoy on Wednesday. Having not received even an acknowledgement, Gray made her letter public last night.

Gray’s letter schools McCoy on the importance of the Nolan Principles of conduct in public life, and accuses the senior LibDem councillor of breaking at least three of the seven points which have been adopted into the council’s code of conduct, including “Honesty – [councillors] should be truthful”.

Gray wrote, “In view of your repeated instances of ignoring clear evidence that went against your desired political outcome, your repeated instances of providing members with false statements, and especially in light of your total indifference to the suffering of the customers of SDEN at New Mill Quarter, I now demand that you resign your position as chair of the HEB committee, and relinquish your role as lead member for SDEN.

“To fail to resign would simply demonstrate that this Liberal Democrat administration is happy to mislead members, happy to mislead the public and happy to mislead customers of SDEN.

“Or, as I said at council on Monday, happy to put two fingers up to taxpayers and residents, as well as fellow members.”

SDEN was devised by Sutton Council as a means of “greenwashing” the polluting Beddington incinerator, by taking energy generated from burning the rubbish from four south London councils, including Croydon, and using it to heat or provide hot water for homes and businesses.

In five years, SDEN has only managed to secure a single customer outlet – Barratts through their NMQ homes – and it has never used as much as a hot water bottle’s worth of energy from the incinerator.

As Inside Sutton reported last month, the dispassionate accountants from civic accountancy body CIPFA have found that the SDEN financial model included business income from non-existent homes and grants from a “green” heat incentive that their scheme was ineligible for.

Putting it out there: Gray’s tweet last night, putting her McCoy letter into the public domain

If the financial model had been accurate, CIPFA suggested, SDEN would have failed.

Sutton’s Tories have been calling for a fraud investigation into SDEN.

In her letter, Gray wrote to  McCoy, “You have been a constant fixture in the concept, inception, planning and operation of Sutton Decentralised Energy Network Ltd…

“Despite numerous questions to Council, from councillors and members of the public, you continued to insist, among other things, that:

  • “No extra buildings were used in the modelling. This has proven to be 100 per cent untrue.
  • “SDEN did not have to return a prescribed profit. This has proven to be untrue.
  • “KPMG found ‘no material issues’ with the financial model. This has proven to be untrue.
  • “KPMG ‘verified’ the financial model. This is untrue.
  • “SDEN prices were ‘benchmarked’ against the Heat Calculator. The Heat Trust has confirmed that the calculator is not a ‘benchmark’, and must not be used as one, so this is untrue.
  • “Further, in 2015 you told the Sutton Guardian that SDEN would be scrapped if it was not profitable. This has proven to be untrue.

“You have therefore repeatedly misled members with the false statements you have made and the answers you have given to questions at council.

“There can be no excuse for this…

“It is a fact that the CIPFA report has shown the issues I lay out here are accurately portrayed… it is implausible that you were unaware of what was going on.

Forceful: Tory councillor Catherine Gray

“If your excuse is that officers failed to inform you, or misled you, then you were not doing your job.

“If your excuse is that you knew the facts but suffered the same ‘optimism bias’ as officers and consultants, then you were not doing your job. You are a qualified chartered accountant, and you have publicly backed a report from a leading accountancy firm that was based on false assumptions.

“This is a serious case of culpability by omission of duty of care, an omission that for a qualified accountant should be a serious matter.

“This cannot be allowed to go on.”

Become a Patron!

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at
  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named the country’s rottenest borough in 2020 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine – the fourth successive year that Inside Croydon has been the source for such award-winning nominations
  • Inside Croydon: 3million page views in 2020. Seen by 1.4million unique visitors

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Catherine Gray, Environment, Jayne McCoy, Sutton Council, Waste incinerator and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to LibDem leader accused of ‘putting two fingers up’ to residents

  1. Lewis White says:

    If only the Conservatives had not abolished the Standards Board for England.

    This body, set up by Labour, had the power to investigate and take action for serious misadministration and other behaviour in local government, police and NHS, and other areas.

    Wikipedia says:

    The Standards Board for England was a non-departmental public body sponsored by the Department for Communities and Local Government. Established under the Local Government Act 2000, it was responsible for promoting high ethical standards in local government. It oversaw the nationally imposed Code of Conduct (also now abandoned), which covered elected and co-opted members across a range of local authorities. The board maintained an independent national overview of local investigations into allegations that members’ conduct might have fallen short of the required standards. In certain cases the board itself investigated allegations. It could not impose sanctions on members, but if it considered that further action might be necessary, it referred cases to the Adjudication Panel for England or to the relevant authority’s own standards committee for determination. Standards committees (no longer compulsory since 2012) could suspend members for up to six months. The Adjudication Panel could disqualify members for up to five years. The Standards Board for England also provided advice, and produced formal guidance, to members and officers on the Code of Conduct.

    As part of the 2010 UK quango reforms, the board ceased to function on 31 January 2012 and was formally abolished on 31 March 2012.

    By the Localism Act 2011, and with effect from 2012, the statutory Model Code was abolished, although all local authorities in England were still required to adopt a code of conduct which was consistent with the seven Nolan Principles of public life; they were not prevented from adopting the former code, after its abolition, on a voluntary basis. Since 2012 authorities have not been required to appoint standards committees, but they retain the power to do so. ”


Leave a Reply