CROYDON IN CRISIS: In sinister moves that raise fundamental questions about freedom of speech and democracy, council officials have ordered a block on elected councillors emailing this website.
EXCLUSIVE by STEVEN DOWNES
Siege mentality: Katherine Kerswell’s council has blocked access to this website for staff – though they can still read The S*n online or watch YouTube videos
There’s a growing sense of a siege mentality and paranoia among the executives who inhabit the loftier floors of Fisher’s Folly, after it was confirmed that Croydon Council staff have been blocked from reading Inside Croydon.
In an extraordinary anti-democratic attack on freedom of speech, even elected councillors have found that they are banned from using their Croydon Council email accounts to contact this website.
Jason Perry, the elected Tory Mayor at the crisis-hit council, has just awarded himself and the borough’s 70 councillors a pay rise, as well as nodding through hundreds of thousands of pounds-worth of added costs with generous salary increases for senior staff.
For example, chief executive Katherine Kerswell’s handsome £192,000 per year, plus exes, pension contributions and the nice little earner that is her fees as election returning officer, has been deemed to be inadequate. So Kerswell was handed a £12,000 per year pay hike, putting her on £204,000 pa.
The pay bands of the council’s other top earners remains something of a mystery. The Tax Payers’ Alliance’s annual Town Hall Rich List has drawn a blank on Croydon for 2025, the second year running. All because under Kerswell, Croydon has failed again to file its accounts.
Quite properly, this ought to be a matter of considerable concern, since despite Perry’s pledge to “Fix the Finances”, Croydon continues to be burdened by debts of £1.4billion, while it has a projected overspend for this financial year of £100million. And all this, and Kerswell’s pay rises, are to be paid for by residents who since 2023, under Mayor Perry, have been hit by Council Tax increases of 27%.
Meanwhile, the council is becoming increasingly remote from the people they are supposed to serve.
Blocked: the automatic message Croydon Council staff receive should they commit the thought crime of trying to access this website
But workers in the council’s offices have noticed that their browsers forbid them to check out Inside Croydon, which some have claimed to be their only source of information about what is really going on at the Town Hall.
“This site has been blocked in accordance with the Croydon Council Acceptable Use Policy,” an official notice scalds staffers who dare click through to iC, “as it may be inappropriate for business use.”
As one of Kerswell’s demoralised staff said, “But we can still access quality news sites such as The S*n, so its not all bad news.”
A brief survey of staff’s browser access to other parts of the world wide interweb suggests that there have been no restrictions placed on other sites, such as YouTube or Reddit, which are clearly entirely appropriate for business use in the view of Kerswell and her closest colleagues.
Staff have reacted with “utter disbelief” that senior management would resort to such a Stalinist approach, while using council resources to achieve their goal.
As is increasingly the case, this decision by senior management has never been discussed in public at the council. Some elected councillors were unaware of any ban on Inside Croydon. Until, that is, they tried to send an email to this website, and found that that was blocked, too.
“A custom mail flow rule created by an admin… has blocked your message,” is the notification received by councillors using their council email accounts, confirming that this is not an accident or “glitch”, but a deliberate action taken by officials at Fisher’s Folly.
“Sending to inside.croydon@btinternet.com is blocked.”
But as with most things Kerswell and her lackeys try to do, their block on Inside Croydon is half-arsed and utterly ineffectual.
“We can still access your Facebook, Bluesky and Spotify,” one staffer advises. “I guess they would need to block all of it to block your pages.”
It is not the first time that Kerswell has tried to gag staff over the parlous state of the council. And after almost five years in the CEO’s job, Kerswell has plenty that she and her exec directors don’t want council staffers to find out about, nor to talk about.
Last year, Kerswell oversaw a spend of £6.4million on outside consultants, seeking their advice on… how to make more cuts. Grumblings and criticism from staff was waved away and ignored.
Blocking Inside Croydon comes close on the heels of Kerswell ordering the closure of Access Croydon, denying the public the opportunity to see a member of council staff without an appointment.
“The changes to Access Croydon are part of the council’s action to protect local services for residents,” Kerswell wrote as she prepared to withdraw another council service.
What public and staff encountered when the system started was described as “chaos”.
Within two days of the new system, tempers had become so frayed, security staff were targets for abuse from their own council colleagues, forcing Kerswell to issue a written warning.
By closing Access Croydon, Kerswell managed to shut the homeless out of their council.
People arriving to seek emergency accommodation are now directed to Central Library, to use one of their computers to register for an appointment in order… to register that they are homeless.
No Access Croydon: more than 30 charities and voluntary organisations have protested against the closure of the council’s public access area
Kerswell and piss-poor Perry have falsely claimed that the new system is “in line with local authorities across London”. In fact, just four other London boroughs have an appointments-only system.
One angry member of council staff said: “It is all about delivering the new target operating model: a self-service, virtual council, where you get to talk to a half-baked AI.”
And Perry and Kerswell have even come up with a way of blocking the public from using the few democratic avenues that are open to them to hold their dysfunctional council to account.
Over the past month or so, more than 5,000 residents have signed petitions, one to campaign against the threatened closure of the Carers’ Centre on George Street, the other to protest the sale of Heathfield House, the council-owned listed building on Gravel Hill.
Both petitions would usually be granted a Town Hall debate, but not in Kerswell’s Croydon.
One e-petition was ruled out because council officials disallowed 2,000 of its 2,500 signatures. The other got lost in a council spam folder, according to the lamest of lame excuses from Kerswell’s council.
But at least, according to Croydon Council, the petitions weren’t deliberately blocked. Maybe that will come next?
Read more: CEO Negrini’s long campaign to shut down Inside Croydon
Read more: People’s protests force Perry into U-turn over Carers’ Centre
Read more: Heritage building Heathfield House is pulled from auction
Read more: Councillors now ordered not to complain over missed bin collections
The Croydon Advertiser sold an average of just 742 copies per week last year (ABC 2024 audit).
Inside Croydon is read by an average of 10,000 people every weekday
TO ADVERTISE your services, products or event to our readers to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
It is quite something that she has blocked the main news site for Croydon. If her incompetence has reached such levels that she is resorting to Trumpian authoritarianism and a brazen disregard for truth, then she go. As she should have done a long time ago.
Laughably tragic
Can we find out what other sites are banned? I’m guessing porn, farming equipment and commerce sites are on the list.
None. Whatsoever. As far as our sources have discovered.
I suspect Spanking Weekly is on the banned list. Can’t provide evidence, obv
A “Stalinist approach”? Nazi, more like it. It’s reminiscent of Hitler’s ban on listening to foreign radio stations and jamming (in the interference rather than musical sense) the BBC.
Does this prohibition extend to people using the computers and wifi in the borough’s few remaining public libraries?
Will any employee with the technical nous to bypass the ban face disciplinary action for visiting the iC “Feindsender*”?
Do councillors have any say in this?
Does Perry support the ban?
I think we should be told
* enemy broadcaster
This is bad news for the local Conservatives and I am surprised that they have made this error.
Such an aversion to Inside Croydon takes the council right the way back to the poor governance of the previous Labour council which put such a strong emphasis on blocking Inside Croydon’s public interest need to follow the council’s questionable practices.
This action empowers the question – how much has the council really changed under a different political party?
If the ban comes from somewhere other than the politicians now is to the time for the Mayor to do something he chose not to do in his own style of leadership in the newly created post and that is to change away from his restrained approach and instead to enfranchise the role and give firm political direction – in this case, that the blocking of Inside Croydon be removed.
It is just such a non-Conservative thing to do to block the press. It’s much more like Labour’s approach. I can say this having been driven out of the local Labour Party in part for my view that Inside Croydon had a public interest need to know how Labour was driving the council onto the rocks.
Conservatives would be the first party nationally to bemoan Chinese government blocking of internet access. Being petty mandarins here in Croydon is inconsistent.
Yes, jailing peaceful protestors is more the Tory style.
A wiser Chief Executive would positively encourage staff to read and liaise with Inside Croydon. It is after all the pre-eminent source of news and opinion about the borough.
Sure, Inside Croydon is often critical of the Council. But forward thinking organisations these days embrace criticism as it allows them to assess what they’re doing and where appropriate make changes.
I think Ms Kerswell might be making a similar mistake to that made by Tony Newman, who was Leader of the Council up to October 2020. He tried to ban Labour councillors from reading Inside Croydon. That didn’t end up well. If you have a secretive and controlling regime, which seeks to avoid scrutiny and accountability, that can lead to disastrous results.
Good to hear that Part Time & Kerswell-Reid have very thin skins. Keep up the good work.
Ban a website/book etc and the readership is likely to increase. As to getting round the ban, most staff and Councillors have their own iPhones and can easily use them on work time unless Kerswell is monitoring loo breaks.
It is among the stupidest things a council run by some stupid people has done.
This is typical of Marxist Labour. They seek to restrict everything you do, say, or think. Kerswell must be running scared, if she’s going down this road too. There’s not enough openness in local government affairs, especially Labour!
Croydon Council is a Conservative-controlled council. Try to keep up, Adrian.
I’m pretty much counting down the days until Perry is gone and Kerswell can join him, Croydon has no chance with people like that in charge. The best way to stop the negative stories from Inside Croydon? Just do a good job. I would be delighted to start going on this site and read stories about regeneration and rejuvenation of Croydon, successful negotiations with central government, smart innovation, smart partnerships and agreements made between the Council and businesses and organisations and community success stories. None of this will ever happen with the type of people we have in charge right now.
Seems reasonable.
I’m thinking a petition might not be a bad idea…. imagine the fun at the Council meeting debating this!
Incidentally I’ve just been banned for 30 days from Nextdoor for having a go at Tony Newman, Mark Johnson, and a racist. Again community values apparently.
What?!!!
Perhaps IC can turn this into a badge of honour or website byline `As banned by Croydon Council!`
However much time was spent implementing this censorship would have been better spent addtessing the Council’s real problems.
Instead of trying to block , silence and threaten Inside Croydon, perhaps, the councils before and present should think about why these articles were published in the first place.
“As a Croydon council tax payer, I’m absolutely appalled by these reports. Blocking access to Inside Croydon, silencing elected councillors, and paying themselves exorbitant salaries while services crumble? It’s a disgrace! This isn’t democracy, it’s a dictatorship. They’re treating us with utter contempt, ignoring our voices, and wasting our hard-earned money. We need transparency, accountability, and a complete overhaul of this corrupt system. Enough is enough!”