‘The deteriorating financial position, which is not being gripped and tackled adequately by the council, is reaching a “financial crisis”.’
Here is the full written statement to the House of Commons today from Jim McMahon, the local government minister
I have previously updated this House that this government is committed to resetting the relationship between central and regional government, and to establishing partnerships built on mutual respect, genuine collaboration and meaningful engagement. Local councils must be fit, legal and decent and this government is taking the action necessary to fix the foundations of local government.
Today, I am updating the House on the steps we are taking to support the London Borough of Croydon to recover and reform.
London Borough of Croydon
I am today publishing the latest report of the London Borough of Croydon Improvement and Assurance Panel, which I received in April. The report acknowledges and welcomes the hard work of the council’s members and staff and notes that there has been some progress over the course of the intervention, which is due to end on 20 July this year.
However, the Council’s financial position is deteriorating rapidly and the report documents serious concerns particularly on the council’s ability to improve, on some aspects of leadership and on use of resources.
Croydon remains one of the most financially distressed councils in the country. The council’s General Fund debt sits at around £1.4billion and it relies on the allocation of Exceptional Financial Support (EFS) through in-principle capitalisation directions to balance its budget. The dramatic increase in the council’s £136million EFS for 2025-2026 from £38million granted for 2024-25 is highly concerning.
The council has received approximately £553m in total EFS since March 2021. This is simply not sustainable.
Failing to change course would condemn Croydon’s residents to a worsening position without an exit strategy. The report sets out that there has been a lack of pace throughout the intervention, but the deteriorating financial position, which is not being gripped and tackled adequately by the council, is reaching a “financial crisis”.
The Stabilisation Plan has been in development since late January, but this does not yet provide a concrete plan to achieve the efficiencies and transformation the council has committed to. Poor financial information and forecasting and a lack of controls have contributed to the deterioration of the financial position.
Bad news: how Jim McMahon’s statement was published this afternoon
There is an increasing reliance on government support to balance the budget, operating costs continue to be “unreasonably high” and the Medium Term Financial Strategy projects the General Fund debt to rise to over £1.9billion by 2029.
The panel document the council’s ambition to deliver transformation but are concerned that the council will find it “enormously challenging” to deliver the necessary transformation and reduce spending whilst maintaining day-to-day delivery. The report notes that, based on benchmarking data, the council’s operating costs can be improved to be more in line with other authorities.
I have carefully considered the report and other relevant material, including the Local Government Association’s Corporate Peer Challenge. I am satisfied that the London Borough of Croydon is failing to comply with its Best Value Duty. I am therefore minded to exercise powers of direction under Section 15(5) and 15(6) of the Local Government Act 1999 to implement an intervention package that ensures the Council’s compliance with its Best Value Duty.
Proposed Package
I am satisfied that the scale of the financial difficulties facing Croydon, the failure of the council to adequately respond to these difficulties and the assurance required moving forward means that a short and sharp reset, with fast action, is required to shift the dial on the council’s recovery.
On balance, I believe this is best achieved by escalating the statutory intervention to a commissioner-led model to ensure the council can achieve sustained change at the pace needed.
The finalisation and implementation of the council’s Stabilisation Plan and in time, a recovery plan, will be fundamental to Croydon’s transformation, reform and recovery.
Commissioners will have greater scope to challenge and support the council to finalise and implement its Stabilisation Plan and deliver realistic transformation and savings, in line with what the council has committed to.
I envisage the appointment of Commissioners until 20 July 2027, with a review of the progress of the intervention after 12 months.
Representations
I am inviting representations from the London Borough of Croydon and any other interested parties on the proposed intervention package by Wednesday 25 June.
I will carefully consider all representations before deciding how to proceed. The proposal to intervene is not taken lightly but is designed to strengthen and accelerate improvement to ensure the council delivers for its residents. With council focus and support from the Commissioners, I expect the council to demonstrate swift and sustained progress necessary to ensuring compliance with its Best Value Duty.
Conclusion
I am committed to working in partnership with the London Borough of Croydon to provide the necessary support to ensure its compliance with the Best Value Duty and the high standards of governance that local residents and service users expect.
I will deposit in the House library copies of the documents referred to, which are being published on gov.uk today. I will update the House in due course.
Read more: Government grants Perry’s record £136m council bail-out plea
Read more: Kerswell’s ‘Stabilisation Plan’ has failed before it is approved
Read more: Cash-strapped council has spent £6.4m… to make more cuts
Read more: Mayor Perry busts his unbalanced budget with £42m overspend
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
He is minded and the statement shows that Perry & Kerswell Reid have been abject failures, but he has not confirmed that Commissioners are to take over the Council since he will accept representations on the matter. So it is still in flux until this part of the process is complete.
I haven’t got much faith in these new guys doing any better with the finances. There doesn’t seem to be any accountability for poor management of council funds so the same mistakes can be made again and again, and taxpayers will have to keep footing the bill.
Jim’ll fix it?
That’s a horrible image…
Perhaps Elon could help us out. He won’t be wasting millions on other campaigns for a while.
Will the Commissioners have a solution? None is stated.
I doubt that disposing of everything the Council ‘owns’ on the public’s behalf (buildings, remaining libraries, parks, roads? etc) and reducing services to at or near those only statutory required (which would be a bony skeleton of a Local Authority) would clear the £1.4bn debt and match outgoings to income.
Oh, how many and how much are Commissioners paid?