Environmental campaigner Feargal Sharkey on live TV this morning called for the immediate resignation of the environment secretary, as the government’s Cunliffe Review is derided as a ‘joke’
Tons of it: sewage was being discharged into rivers and coastlines even as Croydon MP Reed was on TV yesterday
Today’s announcement from environment secretary Steve Reed promising the “biggest overhaul of water since privatisation”, following the Cunliffe review of the water industry, went down about as well as a turd in a blocked toilet with environmentalists, campaigners and customers judging by the reactions to his weekend media round.
It even saw one of the country’s highest profile activists, Feargal Sharkey, call for Reed’s resignation on live television.
“The thing has become an utter shambles,” Sharkey said on Good Morning Britain.
“The idea that on Friday it was announced that [there has been a] 65% increase in serious pollution incidents [in the past year].
“There is no pollution control anymore in this country, and I think Steve has got to reflect very carefully on the role he’s played in the last 12 months.
“I think he should go,” Sharkey said.
Sir Jon Cunliffe’s review contains 88 recommendations to fix the sector, including the scrapping of ineffectual watchdog Ofwat, to be replaced by a “new, single, powerful regulator”.
Easy ride: environment secretary Steve Reed was allowed to glide through his Sunday morning televised interview
Cunliffe’s review does not recommend re-nationalising the privatised regional monopolies, though. Reed, the MP for Streatham (and Croydon North when he can be arsed), deliberately excluded considering such an option when setting the terms for the former senior civil servant’s review.
Reed puts forward the argument that re-nationalising would be too expensive – basing it on figures from a private water industry briefing…
Pretending that he did not know what was in the review when he appeared on Sunday morning telly, today Reed made a speech which echoed his TV “best bits”.
“Our water industry is broken,” Reed said, stating the bleedin’ obvious.
“The government will abolish Ofwat. In the biggest overhaul of water regulation in a generation, we will bring water functions from four different regulators into one.
Empty promise: reducing pollution by 50% from the (then) record highs of 2024 will still leave our rivers and waterways full of shit, and other nasties
“A single, powerful regulator responsible for the entire water sector will stand firmly on the side of customers, investors and the environment and prevent the abuses of the past.”
But the public seems to think it is not just our rivers that are full of shit, as some highlighted on social media Reed’s all-too-cosy relationship with the water industry.
A promise to reduce pollution incidents by half by 2030 was dissected by some on social media for being far too slow, and for only offering a reduction based against the out-of-control peak of pollution incidents occurring this year under Reed and his Labour government.
After Sharkey’s interview on GMB, one viewer posted on Twitter: “Feargal is totally right in all he says.
“This report could be three-feet thick, it won’t change a thing. We, the public, will still bear the cost. The bosses and shareholders will still get rich on us.”
Mapping it: a graph of the Southern Water discharges yesterday, as the company used the excuse of rainfall to empty their sewage tanks
Andrew Fisher, the Inside Croydon columnist, said the Cunliffe report “is a joke”.
Fisher said: “Protecting water profiteers, screwing over bill-payers. Scrap Ofwat, keep water privatised and hike bills by another 30%. Laughable.”
Reed’s appearance on Sunday morning’s Laura Kuenssberg programme came on a weekend when much of the country was getting its first significant rainfall for several weeks, with hosepipe bans being enforced in some areas and, as one tweeter highlighted, even more pollution being pumped into our rivers and coastlines.
“It’s raining a little bit,” Philip Proudfoot tweeted as the TV broadcast was going out, “so Southern Water is now dumping gallons of shit into the sea, where thousands swim every summer.”
Proudfoot’s tweet was accompanied by a map showing the pollution release sites.
“This might seem very, very bad, but don’t despair, the shareholders are happy.”
Others on Twitter responded: “There should be zero sewage pollution, full stop.
“Nationalise the failed water sector and invest the money to fix it. No more public money into private pockets.”
And what amounted to a social media “pile-on” against the environment secretary was led by the usually socially conservative Angling Trust.
“Anglers have heard it all before — pledges, promises, and grand plans to fix the sewage scandal,” wrote the fishermen’s friend, Trust CEO Jamie Cook.
“Yet year after year, water pollution gets worse, not better. The water industry has been allowed to pollute with impunity for too long by successive governments. Reform must be urgent, enforced and rooted in reality, not rhetoric.
“Anglers will continue to fight for clean rivers, and we’ll hold those in power accountable every step of the way. This government — like those before it — will be judged on outcomes, not headlines.”
Even the headlines being generated by Reed and his industry-friendly policy statements weren’t doing him too many favours.
In opposition, Reed had pledged to end the practice of rewarding failure with massive bonuses and pay packets for the bosses of polluting water firms. Yet last week, Lawrence Gosden, the CEO of Southern Water, had his annual pay package almost doubled to £1.4million, despite Reed’s “ban” on bonuses.
Others took issues with Reed’s abuse of figures.
Martin Abrams, a Lambeth councillor in Reed’s Streatham (and Croydon North if he can be bothered) constituency, reacted to the Labour minister’s television claim that it would cost “upwards of £100billion to nationalise water”.
Abrams said: “This is a lie.
“This figure is from a report funded by the privatised water industry to lobby against nationalisation.
Empty rhetoric: the Anglers’ Trust led a social media pile-on against Reed’s soft-touch with the water companies
“Why is a Labour MP regurgitating industry lies?”
And more was to come this morning, when Sharkey appeared on GMB.
As the Undertones frontman pointed out, Reed and his predecessors as Secretary of State have all, and always, had the power to scrap Ofwat, reform the Environment Agency and revise their relationships with other government quangos.
“We have to think of the role the ministers have had in all this for 35 years, because the board of Ofwat, the board of the EA, were personally appointed by the Secretary of State for the environment,” Sharkey said.
“Both of those organisations operate under guidance issued by the Secretary of State for the Environment, Steve Reed. The day he came to office, he could have sacked both those boards and reissued the guidance and ordered both those organisations to proactively enforce the law…
“This is an issue about corporate greed, manipulation, profiteering, financial engineering, £74billion of debt and £84billion of dividends that these companies have ramraided…
“There is no private sector investment. Shareholders are not putting their hands in their pockets for that money, that’s why your bills have just gone up 30, 40, 50%.”
Read more: Thames Water is ‘drowning in debt’ as pollution and bills soar
Read more: Reed took £1,786 football tickets from water company owners
Read more: Labour polling shows MP Reed more unpopular than Starmer
Read more: #TheLabourFiles: MP Reed, Evans and the Croydon connection
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
You really don’t see Reed in the Media that much when he held such a prominent roles in the South London Labour Party and now with a Senior Role with a huge public interest. This weekend demonstrates why. He is a dreadful perfomer and a place holder who simply defends vested powerful interests and has little interest in the hard work of putting things that are terribly wrong right. That would be much too hard work from someone who has done very well out of Politics in the last few decades.
Feargal has become the first figure of prominence to call him out and lets hope this Government of all the Mandelsons finally realises it’s unpopularity is not due to it making hard decisions, but because everyone can see it is not genuine with the public.
Same old shit from Labour – they promised change but just pump out the same crap as the Conservatives.
Labour refuse to allow the change we all actually want. They do nothing to stop companies pumping sewage into rivers and onto our beaches. All while we are left paying bigger bills to pay for executives’ bonuses.
We need to renationalise water now.
Obviously you want to re-nationalise water, but are you happy we’ll all be footing the exorbitant bills that are the result for the rest of our lives. The big problem for me is lack of oversight and common sense that was part of privatisation. Clealy the civil service overseeing this were hoodwinked by the capitalist devils. Everyone agrees that the debts they ran up to pay excessive salaries and bonuses for failure an effing disgrace. And … both pre and post privatisation no one would allow bills to rise enough to pay for years of underinvestment.
The exorbitant bills stem from privatisation, with Thames Water bills rising more than double the rate of UK inflation over the last 36 years.
The increased bills haven’t tackled the underinvestment you complain of, but they have made senior executives and foreign investors rich, at our expense.
Your claim that “both pre and post privatisation no one would allow bills to rise enough to pay for years of underinvestment” is ridiculous
You may want to check publically owned Scottish Water’s record.
Nationalisation alone won’t stop sewage spills.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/scotlands-scandal-sewage-spilled-rivers-34973064
Excellent polint. Alex Plant, chief executive oof Scottish Water has an annual salary of £246,000 and an overall ‘remuneration’ package totalling £483,000
That’s a pittance.
Chris Weston, CEO of Thames Water, started in January 2024 on an annual salary of £850,000 and on a potential performance-related bonus of up to 156 per cent.
In May 2025, it was revealed that the company’s £3bn emergency loan from us was used in part to shell out for a bonus of 50% of base salary to 21 Thames Water executives on 30 April. The greedy sods had a further 50% of base salary in the pipeline (groan) with a final payment of 200% of base salary in June 2026. Thames Water said the future payments are currently “paused”.
For those thumbs-downers: of course they should be nationalised, but there’s no point nationalising things if you’re incapable of running them compentently. You don’t have to look very hard in Croydon for an example of a hopelessly managed public body.
Mr Reed continues to show he is out of his depth not only as a Minister but also as an MP. He should have stayed as a councillor in Lambeth leading it into failure after failure. When my MP in South Norwood he was an absolute disaster and he will never change.
Anyone surprised by Reed’s general uselessness clearly hasn’t had him as their MP. A dreadful company man and weather vane, does nothing for his constituents just promotes his own career every chance he gets.
A bit like fluke taylor, the uncaring and useless lib dumb Sutton mp, then?
Not strictly relevant to the unresolved and ongoing water company scandal, but Croydon now has four MPs again. Both of the male ones (Steve Reed (Labour) in the North and Chris Philp (Tory) in the South) are amongst the worst MPs their parties have at the moment, so perhaps some media organisation could organise a Race to the Bottom debate between them to determine which is really worst (?!), but how do Croydon’s female MPs (Sarah Jones in the West, and Natasha Irons in the East) compare? They are surely better than their Croydon male counterparts?
It doesn’t matter who gets into power, the shit remains the same. That bloody useless regulator, ofTWAT, should be called ofSHIT.
The only time something will get properly done is if it affects the scum in Parliement, as it did in 1858, when the Thames smelled of shit, or was that Parliament that smelled of shit, and the Thames got blamed for it?