Palace swizzled as Swiss sports court upholds UEFA decision

You win some. You lose some.

Considering his legal options: Palace chairman Steve Parish

Less than 24 hours after Crystal Palace captain Marc Guehi lifted the Charity Shield as his side beat Liverpool on penalties at Wembley, his club was handed the verdict of a panel of specialist lawyers at the Court for Arbitration in Sport that consigned the FA Cup-winners to a season playing in UEFA’s third-tier competiton, the Conference League.

Crystal Palace were demoted from the Europa League last month under UEFA’s multi-club ownership rules, and following a day-long hearing on Friday, today CAS lawyers dismissed the south London club’s appeal and ruled that UEFA’s decision should stand.

UEFA are expected to confirm that Nottingham Forest will take Palace’s place in the Europa League – a move that some football insiders suggest is another example of a powergrab by the Premier League, at the expense of the prestige of the world’s oldest cup competition, the FA Cup.

Cup-winners Palace will now consider their legal options – not that they have many.

The European uncertainty may have also adversely affected Palace’s business in the summer transfer window, with coach Oliver Glasner speaking openly last week of his need to increase the size of his squad and bring in players in key positions.

Earlier this month, UEFA conducted the Conference League play-off round draw, with Palace among the seeded teams. Palace are due to play Fredrikstad FK of Norway or Denmark’s FC Midtjylland. It is the first time that Palace have ever played in a European competition.

Palace’s multi-club ownership demotion had come about following objections lodged by Forest, a club owned by Greek media and shipping billionaire, Evangelos Marinakis, who also just happens to own shares in Olympiacos.

Steve Parish, the Palace chairman, had previously described UEFA’s decision as “probably one of the greatest injustices that has ever happened in European football”.

Denied the opportunity to take their usual flags and tifo into Wembley Stadium yesterday for the showpiece curtain-raiser to the new season, Palace’s ultra fans contended themselves with some bright flares and two simple banners.

One said “UEFA”. The other said “MAFIA”.

Crass ruling: the decision from the Swiss-based sports arbitration court, delivered today

UEFA made its decision based on the Palace shareholdings of John Textor, who also had shares in another Europa League club, Lyon. Textor has now sold his Palace stock, but after the March 1 UEFA deadline.

Palace has always denied that it is part of a multi-club operation and never has been, maintaining that although Textor owned more shares than other directors, he never had a controlling interest.

Palace are understood to have argued they had been singled out by UEFA and that its rules had not been applied consistently.

Shield of success: Palace won the Charity Shield yesterday. They have plenty of motivation to win more

Today, CAS said: “After considering the evidence, the panel found that John Textor, founder of Eagle Football Holdings, had shares in CPFC and OL [Olympique Lyonnais] and was a board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of UEFA’s assessment date.

“The panel also dismissed the argument by CPFC that they received unfair treatment in comparison to Nottingham Forest and OL. The panel considered that the UEFA regulations are clear and do not provide flexibility to clubs that are non-compliant on the assessment date, as CPFC claimed.”

By time of publication, Crystal Palace had made no formal comment on the decision.

But the nice people at Five Year Plan, the Palace fanzine, grasped the motivational mettle of the decision: “Looking at positives: We still have Europe. We’ll get to some interesting cities (so long as we win our playoff). We’ve got the ability and determination to win it.”

As previously noted, and now that Palace has won its second trophy this year, there’s no reason why the club won’t go on to win its first European competition next May. The Conference League is significantly weaker than other European cup tournaments.

And the 2026 UEFA Conference League final is due to be staged at the RB Arena in Leipzig… that’s right, in the home stadium of a club owned by Red Bull GmbH, the company which also has significant ownership stakes in Austria’s RB Salzburg, as well as clubs on three other continents. It’s almost as if it is meant to be.


A D V E R T I S E M E N T


Inside Croydon – If you want real journalism, delivering real news, from a publication that is actually based in the borough, please consider paying for it. Sign up today: click here for more details


PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates



  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
  • As featured on Google News Showcase

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Crystal Palace FC, Football, John Textor, Steve Parish and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Palace swizzled as Swiss sports court upholds UEFA decision

  1. Peter Gillman says:

    What a disgusting stitch-up. A sad anti-climax to yesterday’s wonderful repeat win at Wembley.

  2. Sam Olvier says:

    If you listen to the John Textor interview on Talksport with Simon Jordan on YouTube….as soon as Palace won the FA Cup he said he was thinking “Oh Shit” straight away. They already knew they screwed it up as soon as they lifted that cup. Parish has done a great job with Palace from bankruptcy so far but he should admit his mistakes and own up here.

  3. Jim Bush says:

    If Palace want/need to increase their squad size (in the next fortnight or so before the transfer window closes), they need to sell captain Marc Guehi, preferably to Liverpool for circa £45m, to help fund that recruitment. It would be nice to keep Guehi for this season, but only ‘big’ clubs can afford to let their best players leave on free transfers at the end of their contracts, whereas Palace need the cash that selling Guehi THIS summer would bring….?!

  4. Bob Hewlett says:

    I am going to enter a contribution. I would like to say that I do not follow football in any shape or form so I do not have any sort of bias. I assume that every team that takes part in the FA Cup wants to win the final and lift the trophy and then enter the relevant European Tournament. I do know that Palace have been in three FA cup finals so I am assuming that should Palace win, the Board of Directors would have known what European tournament Palace would be entered in. The Board would also have been aware of the ownership ratios of individuals and their ownership ratios of other football clubs. The Board would have also been aware of the ownership of clubs rules as laid down by UEFA whether it full, part ownership, multi-ownership, multi-part ownership or other combinations of ownership. I would have thought that any uncertainty, no matter how slight, would have meant a query sent to UEFA for clarification.
    I feel real sorrow for the season ticket holders, fans, supporters of CPFC because I believe this was a train crash that was going to happen. Not because of UEFA, but because of the failure of the Board of Directors not to take due diligence of investors with their ratio of ownership and multi-ownership ratios should their club win any trophy that entails European football campaigns.
    If I was a supporter of CPFC in any way, I would be asking what were the reasons why the Board missed the 1st March deadline. I could understand a variety of reasons; miscommunication, an unsent email even forgetfulness. I would be asking why not a direct telephone call on the 2nd or as soon as the missed deadline was realized.
    I do not know if football clubs are different but if I owned 44% of something I may not have a controlling interest of it but I sure would make sure my thoughts, feelings and ideas were promulgated or, indeed, acted upon.
    Lessons are there to be learnt and I hope they are. Options could be a bond ownership scheme for supporters etc, limiting to investors to 10%, 20% or even 30% ownership for example.
    I suspect I am writing ignorance so I am welcoming education from footie lovers.
    I may not follow football but I do wish CPFC all the very best now and in the future.

Join the conversation here