Political editor WALTER CRONXITE smells a bit of media manipulation over the handling of news about the capital’s travel concessions
Pass: London Labour have pledged to maintain the Freedom Pass. The 60+ Oyster, however…
London’s Labour-run borough councils, with the “full support” of London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, will block any changes to the Freedom Pass scheme that would restrict its eligibility or reduce the range of transport services it can be used on by the capital’s older residents.
“That pretty much kills it,” according to BBC London’s transport expert, Tom Edwards.
The announcement was made late on Wednesday by the Labour Party, as an online petition reached 60,000 signatures in a backlash against even the suggestion of cutting the benefit currently enjoyed by more than 1million Londoners.
Inside Croydon reported earlier this week how the charity Age UK was mustering its case against any possible reduction in the free transport provision after London Councils, the organisation that represents the capital’s 32 boroughs and the City of London, said that it was looking at conducting a “review” of the Freedom Pass after its annual cost rose to £372million.
With local elections across the capital little more than three months away, the whole scare story, from a New Year leak to the Standard, and this week’s concerted push back by London Councils and Mayor Khan, has the appearance of a political stunt, to portray Labour in as favourable a light as possible before election day across the capital on May 7.
Reed successor: Lambeth’s Claire Holland has just received a New Year’s honour for services to…?
London Councils is, after all, a Labour-dominated organisation. Croydon Mayor Jason Perry is one of only six Conservative council chiefs to attend its meetings. London Councils is chaired by Claire Holland, a successor to Steve Reed as the leader of Lambeth and recently handed a gong for her political service.
So if Labour in London wanted to, they might have killed even the suggestion of a “review” of the Freedom Pass before it made it into one of their formal reports. Instead, we have had a leak, a public push back and now a firm rebuttal, ostensibly to get London’s pensioners reassured. It smells of cultivated media management, a political ploy.
What is also noticeable about the announcement from Holland and London Labour is that while assurances are given for the 66+ Freedom Pass (funded by London Councils from the boroughs’ parking permit and road fines revenues), it contained no such guarantee about the 60+ Oyster Card, which is paid for by Transport for London and the Mayor of London.
“The previous Conservative government slashed funding for the Freedom Pass scheme, leaving councils to foot the bill,” Holland said.
“It’s clear that we need to ensure the Freedom Pass is funded sustainably, but this cannot be done at the expense of older Londoners.
“We know the Freedom Pass is a vital lifeline for our older residents and we must defend it. Labour councils will oppose any changes that would see restrictions placed on who can use it and which modes of transport it applies to.”
And the Mayor of London said: “While I have no control over the 66+ pass, Labour councils have my full support in committing to keep it.
‘Full support’: London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan
“As Mayor, I am ensuring hundreds of thousands of older Londoners are also able to enjoy free travel by continuing to provide the 60+ Oyster card alongside other concessions for Londoners.”
And Sir Sadiq then said this: “The previous Tory government wanted to get rid of the 60+ Oyster card.” So far, so factual. “It’s clear that only Labour can be trusted to protect concessionary travel for Londoners.” Which is not the same as saying that Transport for London will continue to fund the 60+ Oyster with concessionary travel as at present.
Oh, and London Councils’ “review” of the Freedom Pass?
That’s still to be conducted. To be fair, when spending £372million of public money in a year, keeping an eye on how that’s being done makes good governance sense.
Even the London Labour announcement confirmed that London Councils are looking at “how best to manage the financial impact of the scheme”, they said, “although no changes are currently proposed”.
At least not until after May’s Town Hall elections, that is…
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2026, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for an EIGHTH time in nine years, in Private Eye magazine’s annual round-up of civic cock-ups
- Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
If they want my 60+ Oyster card, they’ll have to take it from my cold, dead hands.
But you’re not a day over 43, surely?
Summoning up your inner Charlton Heston! Thanks
Oh that’s alright then, all us over sixties can rest easy knowing that Labour have pledged to look after us, anybody who believes a Labour pledge must be soft in the head! This is just empty words prior to local elections.
Pingback: Claire Holland’s manufactured threat to the Freedom Pass at heart of Labour’s ‘lying leaflets’ scandal
Pingback: Labour’s ‘Lying Leaflet Scandal’: Lib Dems escalate ‘big fat lie’ to Electoral Commission