A banner in council colours has appeared outside the Purley Pool this week lauding Jason Perry’s role in the (non-)development of the site in what rival politicians have described as a clear breach of election law.
EXCLUSIVE by STEVEN DOWNES
Banned banner: council bosses cleared this Jason Perry promotion to appear one day before election ‘purdah’ began
Elaine Jackson, the council’s £210,000 interim chief executive, has been dragged into a pre-election political row after refusing to remove a large poster outside Purley Pool which promotes Tory Jason Perry in his campaign to be re-elected as Croydon Mayor.
Jackson is supposed to be a neutral public official who next month will be overseeing the conduct of local elections as Croydon’s Returning Officer.
Jackson was promoted by Perry as the council’s head of service after Katherine Kerswell quit Fisher’s Folly last October.
In February this year, Perry authorised an above-inflation pay rise for Jackson and other council directors.
In the last few days, a large banner has appeared outside Purley Pool, in Croydon’s corporate colours and carrying the council logo, with the message: “This is a major regeneration project driven by Executive Mayor Jason Perry to return a pool to the heart of Purley and to restore pride in the area.”
“Driven”. As if.
“Restore pride” has also been a regular theme in Perry and Croydon Conservatives’ own leaflets.
No answer: Elaine Jackson has failed to respond to Labour’s urgent complaint
The banner has been condemned by Perry’s political rivals for breaking the strict laws on how local authorities should conduct themselves in a politically neutral manner, especially around election time, when they are forbidden from using public money to favour any particular candidate.
Stuart King, Labour’s leader at the Town Hall, has written to Jackson and to Stephen Lawrence-Orumwense, the former estate agent who now runs Croydon’s legal department, demanding that the banner should be removed immediately.
King’s request has so far been ignored, with the banner still in situ over the Easter bank holiday weekend.
Jason Perry and senior council officials have already been roundly criticised from all sides for “campaigning on the rates”, with the inclusion of an election letter from the Conservative Mayor included with all Council Tax notices sent out last month, in addition to the Our Croydon freesheet, paid for by Council Tax-payers and full of Perry pictures and propaganda.
Election rules at councils demand a period of “purdah”, where nothing can be published or distributed by a local authority in a pre-election period. In Croydon, that purdah period started on Monday, March 30. It is understood that the Purley Pool banner was put up on Sunday, in a deliberate attempt to get around the law.
“It just gets more and more shameless,” said Major Richard Howard, the Liberal Democrat candidate for Croydon Mayor.
Propaganda Perry: Croydon’s Mayor is centre of attention in his tax-payer funded freesheet
Peter Underwood, the Green Party’s mayoral candidate, viewed the banner as outright electioneering for the Conservatives. “All election material needs to have an ‘imprint’ by law to say who has produced it and paid for it. I can’t see one on this.”
King, who is working as election agent for Labour’s candidate for Croydon Mayor, Rowenna Davis, has already raised a formal complaint over the publication of the latest issue of Our Croydon, using public money.
The council’s legal department claims that it is conducting itself within the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority publicity.
King was fobbed off with this response: “The current edition of the Our Croydon, the e-newsletters, and the letter to residents with their Council Tax bills are council publications which serve the purpose to keep residents informed about the services and activities of the council. They are consistent with the Publicity Code’s requirements and are politically neutral and do not seek to influence public support for a political party or the Mayor.”
On the banner outside Purley Pool, King sent his complaint to Jackson and Lawrence-Orumwense on Wednesday. He called the banner “a clear breach of the council’s pre-election period guidance”.
Banner complaint: Cllr Stuart King
He wrote: “I am of the view that this breaches the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity, in particular in that authorities should not issue any publicity which seeks to influence voters and that publicity relating to individuals involved directly in the election (in this case Jason Perry) should not be published.”
King says that the banner appears “to be a council initiative that promotes the Conservative Mayoral candidate by name”.
The Labour councillor notes that Purley Pool was a “highly contentious” election issue four years ago. Despite Perry making an election promise to re-open Purley Pool, a development scheme to build hundreds of retirement homes on the site has failed to progress beyond its planning application, which gained approval from City Hall more than three months ago.
King wrote to the council bosses: “There is no apparent ‘business as usual’ necessity for this banner to be displayed during the pre-election period.
“It is also displayed on a council building which is also a breach of the pre-election period guidance.
“Please can you confirm that this will be removed immediately.”
The pair of six-figure-salaried council chiefs have so far not replied to King.
Read more:Labour’s Town Hall leader files complaint over Perry’s spending
Read more: Now Perry wants to axe school safety patrols to save £58,000
Read more: Mayor Perry accused of ‘cover-up’ over Sentamu case review
Read more: Silicon Alley: 800 Croydon firms have closed under Mayor Perry
THE CROYDON INSIDER PODCAST: Hear Labour councillor Rowenna Davis answering readers’ questions in our round-table news panel podcast thingy by clicking here for our Spotify feed
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2026, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for an EIGHTH time in nine years, in Private Eye magazine’s annual round-up of civic cock-ups
- Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
More Lies from the Perry Camp.
Surely he’s got to stand in the naughty corner and face the wall forever this person does not give a choc about anything he just thinks he is sweet what ever he does ?
Let’s hope that nobody steals or vandalises this expensive piece of flammable plastic bought with our money, or worse, writes some witty words on its important message to mock Mayor Perry and his promise, made four years ago, that “I will re-open Purley Pool and Leisure Centre”
676 more flats near East Croydon station (as if Croydon didn’t already have too many flats)? Perhaps the developers should provide a zipwire* so that overpaid residents of these unaffordable flats can zoom straight down to the station instead of having to dodge the buses and trams crossing George St?
*=they will need to ensure that the zipwire doesn’t get tangled with the overhead power lines for the tram, to avoid frying the zipwire users !?!
How does Perry get away with these things?
That banner about Purley Pool is so bad it is probably working against Perry!
Oh how amusing to see Mayor Perry’s opponents moaning about keeping the public informed about a public facility! They would not want anything like that to be done if they were Executive Mayor would they? Let’s be realistic. The Purley Leisure Centre has been empty for quite a while. People walking past would wonder why nothing was being done about the site. Now, hoardings have been erected around the site and the banner has been displayed to explain what is planned for the site for public use. This gives us hope that something will at last be done.
Of course Mayor Perry’s opponents are unhappy: they can no longer claim in their electoral campaigns that he has done nothing in his campaign over the past few years to restore a swimming pool facility to Purley.
I will admit that I am not happy with the concept of demolishing a modern-looking building which also used to house a useful Sainsbury’s supermarket and a fair-sized car park. I suppose that Croydon Council simply could not finance the refurbishment of the swimming pool on its own, given the enormous debts that Mayor Perry inherited, and thus had to rely on property developers — who of course had their own criteria for the viability of the project.
I wonder whether you could do us, the electorate, a favour? Could one of your intrepid reporters interrogate each mayoral candidate with the aim of extracting a promise that they would fully inform the electorate of the financial effect of every future proposed project of the magnitude of schemes such as Brick-by-Brick? We don’t want to be fooled again.
So you have no problem with your money being spent and the law being broken, blatantly? Noted: sort of makes you an accessory.
What about the pretty blatant electioneering letter included with the Council Tax bills this year?
That was reported previously and is mentioned in the article here. Perry’s favourite estate agent-cum-lawyer thinks it was absolutely fine…
Next: Harold Shipman offers advice on care for the elderly.