Burnham’s election could make all the difference in Croydon

Political pantomime: having been once blocked by the Labour Party from standing in a by-election in the north-west, Andy Burnham saw off all challengers in Makerfield on Thursday

Andy Burnham won the Makerfield by-election this week. Here, ANDREW FISHER outlines what the result could mean for Britain, and for Croydon and its politicians

When I interviewed journalist Peter Geoghegan earlier this month, I put to him that his work had caused probably the most consequential by-election in British political history.

Geoghegan’s award-winning journalism exposed the role played by Labour Together, and how its then-director, Josh Simons, had hired a company to spy on journalists investigating his organisations dodgy donations. Ahead of the 2024 General Election, Simons was parachuted into the safe Labour seat of Makerfield in Greater Manchester, and duly became its MP. It was not long before Simons was given a junior post in Keir Starmer’s government.

But the exposure of his past machinations ended Simons’ fledgling ministerial career, and plausibly led to him deciding to end his tenure as an MP after just two years in office – making way for Andy Burnham.

Burnham’s overwhelming victory in the Makerfield by-election – where he beat Reform by 20% – looks as if it will trigger an earthquake in British politics.

Burnham is now likely to become Prime Minister in short order, despite Keir Starmer’s claims that he will fight on. Less than 24 hours after polls closed, ministers in his own cabinet are already telling Starmer to go.

Landslide: Burnham increased Labour’s vote share in Makerfield, where Tories, Greens and LibDems all failed to get even 1,000 votes

Burnham’s victory is also a severe setback for Reform. Makerfield had been their sixth highest showing at the 2024 General Election and was 29th on Farage’s party’s target list. With Reform having won every council seat in the constituency at last month’s local elections, they were confident they could win.

“Andy Burnham is going to lose Makerfield and he’s going to lose it by some way,” was the prediction of Reform’s former (failed) parliamentary candidate Matthew Goodwin.

Labour had lost the Runcorn by-election to Reform in 2025 and was beaten into third by them and the victorious Greens in Gorton and Denton in February this year. So Makerfield was never going to be a walkover. What Burnham did, which will be decisive for Labour MPs considering the Prime Minister’s future, was win back voters for Labour who had been abstaining, voting Green or Liberal Democrat. He reunited a progressive bloc of voters who have been alienated by Starmer.

In recent months, in England, Wales and Scotland, the Greens, Plaid Cymru and the SNP had been positioning themselves as the party to stop Reform. Under Burnham, Labour has a real chance of reclaiming that crown.

Campaign video: Rowenna Davis in Croydon borrowed pointers from Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham

Last month, in Croydon’s mayoral election, we saw how the left vote splintered between Labour and the Greens. Could Andy Burnham as Prime Minister restore a progressive coalition of voters under Labour’s banner?

Rowenna Davis’s campaign for Croydon Mayor was influenced by the Greater Manchester Mayor, as she posted videos of herself in discussion with Burnham on social media.

On May 7, while Starmer’s Labour went backwards across London, in Croydon, Labour’s vote held up. Davis closed the gap on Tory incumbent Mayor Jason Perry. But the Green surge, mostly at the expense of Labour, meant Davis just missed out.

Croydon’s next mayoral election is four years away, but Davis would be forgiven for thinking that the edge provided by Burnham as Labour leader might have been enough to put her in office.

The prospects for another Croydon Labour figure may not be so good. Steve Reed, the MP for Streatham and Croydon North, has been one of Starmer’s most loyal defenders, accusing those wanting to challenge Starmer of indulging in a “psychodrama”.

The public, and most Labour members,  are very clear. Burnham is the most popular politician in the country, while Starmer is the least popular Prime Minister in polling history. The manner of Burnham’s victory in Makerfield has not gone unnoticed by Reed’s ministerial colleagues, as some have already called on the Prime Minister to set out a timetable for his departure.

An incoming Prime Minister will want his own team around him, and Labour Together co-founder Reed could find himself on the backbenches.

Another question is whether Burnham as Labour leader with a changed agenda could win back disgruntled Labour members and bolster the party’s activist numbers which have dwindled in the last six years under Starmer: the membership total is suggested to have fallen below 250,000, based on internal party figures leaked and reported, down from the 552,835 members the party officially held when Starmer took over as leader in April 2020.

Put that on the side of a bus: Andy Burnham has a successful record of delivery in Manchester

Burnham definitely seems to be taking a more ambitious approach than Starmer. “A vote for me is a vote to end 40 years of trickle-down economics … it is a vote to bring down water bills, energy bills, to make life more affordable again,” he said on the eve of the by-election.

Burnham can point to his time as Greater Manchester Mayor, when he reversed the 40-year experiment of bus deregulation, took on the private bus companies, capped fares and improved services.

He has a record of delivery, but the scale of the challenge he might face now, if he becomes Prime Minister, is of a whole different order.

The cost-of-living crisis is why the Conservatives were kicked out so emphatically in 2024. Burnham is raising the right issues, and in doing so has shown he can reunite the progressive vote behind Labour.

Whether he can fix Britain is unclear, but what is beyond doubt now is that he is currently Labour’s and the country’s best hope.

Andrew Fisher’s recent columns:


Inside Croydon – If you want real journalism, delivering real news, from a publication that is actually based in the borough, please consider paying for it. Sign up today: click here for more details


PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates


  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
  • As featured on Google News Showcase
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2026, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for an EIGHTH time in nine years, in Private Eye magazine’s annual round-up of civic cock-ups

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Andrew Fisher and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Burnham’s election could make all the difference in Croydon

  1. As Noam Chomsky said, “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.”

    I’m sure the debate between Starmer supporters and Burnham supporters will be very lively, while the rest of us try to spot any significant difference in opinion or policy between them.

    I’m afraid that the ‘get Starmer out’ crowd will discover the same thing as the ‘get the Tories out’ crowd at the 2024 election. If you just focus on what you are getting out (or keeping out) then you will find that what you’ve got in isn’t much better, and may end up being even worse. Swapping one centrist dad for another one as leader of the Labour Party won’t change how the Labour Party operates and won’t change any Government policies either.

    So the prospect of Andy Burnham becoming the next PM doesn’t fill me with any excitement and doesn’t give me any hope that things will get much better. If we want real hope then we need real change. That’s why I will be sticking with the Green Party and I invite anyone who is interested in really getting our country back on track to a brighter and more caring future to join us.

  2. Peter kudelka says:

    “Really getting …on track…” do you mean to imply that Andy doesn’t “really “ want to improve things? This is arrogance, particularly as you have not been elected for any post yourself and only 308 voters agreed with your views in the Marketfield election. That said Andy does agree with you on the need for electoral reform, well until he changes his mind that is. I think Andrew’ Fisher’s comment “ fix Britain” is spot on, we don’t need a new or radical system but we do need competency in running the current one, populist charlatans from the right or left are unlikely to supply this. Hasn’t mediocre management over the years been Croydon’s malaise, not necessarily the party in charge?

  3. Ian Kierans says:

    Andrew as usual gives a very concise analysis.
    There are a couple of issues here he alludes to but shy’s away from.
    1. The nations economy – which is £2.91bn in debt. Fundamentally growth out of this has to be a given as trying to squeeze the small amounts out of taxpayers and reduce the interest payments never mind the capital debt has little to no chance before 2040+
    2. The appetite of the British voter to have yet another party stabbing the PM in the back when it gets tough. Consideration should be given to having Mr Burnham as a Deputy or vice versa. Both could/should park the ego’s and work together to really deliver effectively without having an implementation shambles.

    For the Labour party itself Andrew is very right and the concerns of the reductions in activists is notable with those lstill plodding along having campaign fatigue. But numbers may grow again come the next election.

    I like Peters party plug. It would be great to have that energy in a larger party where a real difference can be made.?

  4. derekthrower says:

    This is desperate stuff from Fisher. The hope that Burnham will rehabilitate Corbyn back into the Labour Party seems far more important than the actual record of an all encompassing ambition and never ending reflexive political positioning.
    Fisher talks about how Burnham acquired this seat from the appalling Josh Simons, but then fails to consider what the quid pro quo of that transaction is. The Mandelson influence will be far more important under the new Leadership than those who failed miserably when they had their chance.
    So he has been good at public transport, but arguably Sadiq Khan has been a far more successful manager of London Transport than him. No one is exactly roaring for Khan to return to Parliament.
    As with Andrew Fisher hope is far more important than reality or actually delivering something tangible as like Corbyn & McDonnell they all make a good living out of it anyway. Burnham emerged during the Blair era and as Health Minister his actions were the same privatisation and lobby interests as all that have ever followed. He made all the same old soft sounding noises to the Labour left back then too, but only a fool believed it then and now.

  5. Hazel swain says:

    a general election should be called ASAP IMO

Join the conversation here