Miliband visits Croydon to back Livingstone for Mayor

Ken Livingstone's campaign to become Mayor of London drew support this morning from the Labour party leader Ed Miliband as he backed the Fare Deal policy with commuters in Croydon

There will be no incinerator at Beddington Lane if Ken Livingstone is elected Mayor of London in May.

As first suggested by Inside Croydon a week ago, the policy announcement was made by Livingstone this morning when he came to Croydon with Labour party leader Ed Miliband to begin his battle bus tour of London’s 32 boroughs.

Livingstone said he was “opposed to any future incineration” in London and that under his mayoralty, waste would be dealt with through anaerobic digestion and that the expensive burning of valuable recyclables would be reduced throughout the capital.

Livingstone said that with the change in policy it would mean that he would turn down the planning application for the  Viridor incinerator, a £1 billion construction and 25-year management deal proposed for Beddington Lane on the Croydon-Sutton boundary.

This announcement just before the local Labour party hold a community meeting in Waddon this evening suggests that the opposition in Croydon Council has been working on this issue for a while.

Ed Miliband, the Labour party leader, being questioned while campaigning in Croydon this morning

Livingstone also pledged to return the police officers recently lost from Croydon town centre, as he takes police numbers back to 1,700 more than the numbers under current Mayor Boris Johnson.

He also promised to build the tram extension to Crystal Palace “cancelled by Boris”.

His promise of a 7 per cent fare cut would save Coulsdon residents £1,700 on their commuting tickets to London, Livingstone said.

Asked by Inside Croydon what pensioner voters in the London elections should do after the yesterday’s Budget Granny Tax, Miliband said that they should feel confident that Livingstone would help pensioners through his policy on heating bills and that they should use the 2012 election as an early opportunity to protest their treatment.

Miliband went on to have a meeting with Croydon pensioners in a coffee shop with the national press in tow. No doubt a post-Budget whizzo idea from national Labour party officials, but those present may not have been entirely representative: they were older Labour councillors and Labour activists. Inside Croydon‘s reporters look youthful for their age and were politely asked to leave.

  • Inside Croydon: brought to you from the heart of the borough, free of charge, an independent voice standing for freedom of speech for the people of Croydon
Advertisements

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Andrew Pelling, Commuting, Croydon Central, East Croydon, Ken Livingstone, London Assembly, London-wide issues, Louisa Woodley, Mayor of London, Waddon, Waste incinerator and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Miliband visits Croydon to back Livingstone for Mayor

  1. Pingback: Thursday’s London Links: bumper crop

  2. Forgive me ,if i am wrong ,but i fail to see the benefit of the tram extension to crystal palace , after all if you want to get from most of croydon to crystal palace you can get on the train or the bus , the 157 goes all the way to morden , and the return fare is less than a couple of Quid for most trips . Wouldn’t a regular service also cause extra congestion down the road towards anerley as well as possibly shuit down that road , leading to the traffic shifting to other more serene back roads . while they lay the tram tracks ? if i remember correctly , the KICC proposal was challenged on the grounds of the extra congestion it would bring to the area, and i fail to see how on those grounds the tram extension would ever be accepted by the Local community .Also of note , while i can see that he might find the money for the fares cut from an increased precept (i.e taking more of our money when we pay our council tax) if the extra revenue goes on the fares reduction , how can he fund additional infrastructure projects like the Tram extension ?

Leave a Reply