Fairness Commission’s iPad prize struggles to get response

When the crunch comes in Croydon over Tory Chancellor Gideon Osborne’s cuts, Council Tax-payers may be less than delighted to find that the £200,000 being spent on the borough’s Opportunity and Fairness Commission is going largely on a contract with a local PR agency, and that they have resorted to dangling a £400 iPad mini and additional prize vouchers to try to get youngsters involved.

ipad miniEven that generosity, apparently out of public funds, appears to have had little impact, as the youth of the borough are failing to engage with the “Share What’s Unfair” competition.

The Fairness and Opportunity Commission had its first meeting in January, much later than had been scheduled. Chaired by the Bishop of Croydon, Jonathan Clark, the commission quickly lost one of its hand-picked commissioners, and soon afterwards, it lost the interest of much of the rest of the borough, too.

The commission’s work is being managed largely out of the George Street offices of The Campaign Company, which was founded 14 years ago by David Evans, a former assistant general secretary of the Labour Party. It was Evans who ran the 2001 General Election campaign nationally for Tony Blair. The Campaign Company also had a role in Croydon Labour’s successful 2014 local election campaign.

The Fairness Commission’s next event is a talk tonight by Lord Glassman, the Labour academic who coined the phrase “Blue Labour”. Yep, that’s about as exciting as it gets.

Don't all rush at once: the Fairness Commission's appeal to Croydon youth has not yet caused much of a stir

Don’t all rush at once: the Fairness Commission’s appeal to Croydon youth has not yet caused much of a stir

The Fairness Commission’s efforts to reach out to Croydon’s youth appears to be equally underwhelming. Inside Croydon received the same press release from The Campaign Company twice in a week at the end of June.

It reads…

“The young people of Croydon are being given the opportunity to speak out about what they think is unfair about life in Croydon.

“The young [sic] Opportunity and Fairness Commission (YOFC) have [sic] developed a competition for 11 – 24 year olds [sic] living or studying in Croydon, named ‘Share What’s Unfair’, running until the 31st of July.

“‘Share what’s [sic] Unfair’ is a social media based [sic] competition. The young people are being asked to tweet, Instagram or Facebook [sic] a picture of what they find unfair, using the hash tag, #CROunfair. The winner will receive an iPad mini, while gift vouchers will be given to those in second and third place [sic].

“The aim of the competition is for the YOFC to gain insight into what young people find unfair for the young people of Croydon, in order to help develop proposals for the Commissioners of the Croydon Opportunity and Fairness Commission to take into account.

“To enter the competition you can tweet your picture to @OppCroydon, join the ‘Opportunity Croydon’ Facebook page and share the photo or follow @oppcroydon on Instagram, and tag them in your photos with the hash tag, #CROunfair. Terms and conditions can also be found on the Facebook and Instagram pages.”

Of course, the “Young Opportunity and Fairness Commission” might have discovered what Croydon teenagers believe to be unfair by organising visits to the PSHE lessons of Year 11 classes at, say, half a dozen of the borough’s state schools, or maybe even a couple of weekend sessions staged in one or two of the borough’s libraries, and doing something regarded as “old-fashioned”: asking people for their opinions.

That approach might not be open to accusations of being superficial, or patronising.

But maybe getting the council to pay for an iPad mini to be handed out is cheaper. It certainly seems lazier.

The method adopted by The Campaign Company for this particular campaign with Croydon’s youth doesn’t appear to be getting much “traction”, as the PR flaks might put it.

A quick cast around social media this morning found little evidence of engagement on the Commission’s Facebook page, or using the prescribed hashtag. Indeed, over the past fortnight, the only activity appears to come from whoever it is who has been managing the Commission’s Facebook and Twitter accounts, or from the youth-orientated website which is run by the same person who drafted the press release.

We found just one photograph tagged with #CROunfair, and that appears to have been lifted from a Canadian Salvation Army website.

There is, of course, an alternative explanation other than apathy among Croydon’s youth towards this uninspiring “social media-based competition”. Maybe the Croydon Glee Club has been right all along, and there’s nothing unfair about Croydon whatsoever.

Inside Croydon: Named among best regional media campaigns, 2014.

  • Croydon’s only independent news source, based in the heart of the borough: 729,297 page views in 2014.
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Bishop of Croydon, Croydon Council, Education, Fairness Commission, Schools, Tony Newman and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Fairness Commission’s iPad prize struggles to get response

  1. I have just had a look at Croydon Council’s site on Facebook and also the Opportunity Croydon bit.
    To be honest I think I would rather watch George Osborne do Break Dancing or listen to David Cameron’s latest Rap. Both are bound to be more inspiring than these two dull, dull, dull sites. That …plus there are at least 500 other internet sites where I can enter to win an IPad mini…and most are more inspiring or amusing than the Croydon ones.

  2. But I did try to read them through the multicoloured specs of the target generation and not through my own pebble glass geriatric NHS lenses….I tried, I tried…but could not see any of my grandchildren or the lively young people with whom they associate being in the slightest bit interested. Both lack that essential ingredient that would, in my far distant youth, have been called cool. I’ll see what the grandchildren have to say later… if they will speak to me after the experience.

Leave a Reply