Barratt’s, Bolger and the curious case of Sutton’s extra piping

Sutton Council’s junketing at MIPIM in the South of France next month is being paid for, in part at least, by a company which is subject to an investigation over bribery allegations by the Metropolitan Police’s complex fraud team.

Barratt hi vis generic

Barratt London is an off-shoot of the UK’s biggest house-building firm

Niall Bolger, Sutton’s chief executive, was quoted in an official press release last week – issued just days after Inside Croydon had revealed details of the £30,000 trip – which confirmed that the council’s three-person delegation to the property developers’ conference in Cannes is being part-sponsored by Barratt’s London.

Alastair Baird, the managing director of the London division of the country’s biggest housebuilders, was arrested last October, as was a former Barratt’s employee.

At the time, Scotland Yard said that there was an ongoing inquiry into “a number of allegations of corruption … related to irregularities in the tendering process”. No detail was provided about which projects this related to.

Barratt’s had been conducting an internal investigation since August 2015. Last month a further three arrests were made in the course of the investigation. Baird remains on police bail. The company has said that it will “co-operate fully with the Metropolitan Police and to conduct our own investigation into these matters”.

Barratt’s, through its various divisions and subsidiaries, has wide-ranging interests in property development across south London. It is Barratt’s to whom Boris Johnson, when he was Mayor of London, handed the publicly owned Cane Hill hospital site at no charge, just to get hundreds of houses built close to Coulsdon. The land was estimated as being worth £250million.

Sutton CEO Niall Bolger: never met Alasdair Baird

Sutton CEO Niall Bolger: never met Alasdair Baird

And in Sutton, Barratt’s have been courted for years to sign-up for the council-backed heating network, called SDEN, to service its Felnex housing development using water supposedly heated by the incinerator being built at Beddington Lane.

When Bolger had the arrests of Baird and the investigation into Barratt’s London division brought to his attention last year, he was adamant that Sutton Council had had no involvement with that company or Baird over Felnex.

In an email to Ruth Dombey, the council leader, and other senior councillors, sent on October 20 last year, Bolger wrote: “We are dealing with a separate operational division of Barratts. Mr Baird is the MD for the London Division. The Felnex development is being taken forward by the Kent Division.

“So in response to your question, there have been no meetings with Mr Baird.”

Yet records at Companies House show that, until last November when he resigned as a director, Baird was indeed involved with BDW Trading, the Barratt’s subsidiary which is developing the Felnex site in Sutton.

Neither Sutton Council nor the company have made any announcement of a conclusion of the long-running negotiations over Barratt’s taking SDEN as its heating supplier at Felnex.

How Sutton Council last week confirmed that their visit to MIPIM is to be paid for in part by Barratt's London, a division of the house-builders that Niall Bolger has denied has any role in the Felnex development

How Sutton Council last week confirmed that their visit to MIPIM is to be paid for in part by Barratt’s London, a division of the house-builders that Niall Bolger has denied has any role in the Felnex development

Sutton securing a major client for its heating for the next 20 to 30 years is of fundamental importance to the LibDem council as it imposes the polluting Viridor incinerator on south London. Unless the incinerator and the council make money from turning waste into heat, all Dombey and Bolger’s arguments and the (already dubious) financial case for building the incinerator collapse.

Tonight, Barratt’s has an application going before the Sutton Council planning committee which includes the installation of piping that would allow the SDEN heating network to operate beyond Felnex. This seems curious.

Here’s the actual application wording:

Installation of underground heating pipes, electrical cabling, communication cabling and associated works to allow the transfer of hot water and high speed data though a decentralised energy network for use by the Felnex development and to provide a future connection point on Hackbridge Road which would facilitate the wider borough network connection.

Barratt's Alasdair Baird: has never met Sutton's CEO, according to Niall Bolger

Barratt’s Alastair Baird

And curiouser. When Barratt’s originally submitted the application last autumn, the wording was a bit different. It says:

“The installation of underground heating pipes, electrical cabling, communication cabling and associated works to allow the transfer of hot water and high speed data though a decentralised energy network for use by the Felnex development and to provide a future connection point on Hackbridge Road which would facilitate the wider borough network connection for SDEN and future proof the Felnex site.” Those are our italics.

You can see Barratt’s original planning application letter in pdf format here.

So Barratt’s is applying for planning permission to Sutton so that they can pay for Sutton to connect SDEN to a wider area. Why isn’t Sutton paying for this?

Inside Croydon has been unable to find previous applications by Barratt’s in Sutton in which providing this generous offer to lay additional SDEN piping was included as a condition of planning permission.

And it was clearly never discussed with Alasdair Baird when he was still a director of the company doing the work, because according to Niall Bolger, “there have been no meetings with Mr Baird”.


  • Inside Croydon is Croydon’s only independent news source, still based in the heart of the borough. In 2016, we averaged 17,000 page views every week
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Boris Johnson, Business, Cane Hill, Housing, Mayor of London, Niall Bolger, Property, Ruth Dombey, Sutton Council, Waste incinerator and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Barratt’s, Bolger and the curious case of Sutton’s extra piping

  1. joeycan says:

    Perhaps I might go a bit further and ask whether the contractual arrangements of the West London Waste Plan mean that our wonderful Borough is liable, together with Merton and Kingston, for a contribution towards the SDEN connection. It would appear that it was never possible for this Borough to withdraw from the Incinerator scheme so are we talking of ‘share and share alike’??

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s