Transport report for free school site rates it ‘poor’ to ‘worst’

Traffic on just a typical weekday morning rush hour on Coombe Road – but this is before the new free school adds at least 2,000 extra journeys daily to the location

Residents in South Croydon, living close to the site of the £30million free school which has been granted planning permission by Croydon Council, fear that the decision will make the 180 11-year-old first-year intake vulnerable to the high volume of traffic which races along Coombe Road when the school opens in September.

Croydon’s Labour-run council removed Green Belt protections from the Coombe Wood playing fields to allow them to push through the scheme which provides a site for a selective school that will eventually accommodate 1,200 pupils, aged 11 to 18, plus staff.

That means a possible 2,000, or more, additional journeys to and from the site every weekday. 

Residents are concerned that this always busy stretch of road is a danger to young children

But residents living nearby are concerned that the transport plan agreed at last week’s planning committee is rushed, ill-considered and inadequate.

The elected councillors on the planning committee and the council’s planning staff even ignored the warning given in the officers’ final version of the planning report which set out the dangers:

“Due to the size of the site, the Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) varies between 2 (poor) and 0 (worst). The entrance to the site has a (PTAL) rating of 1b (very poor).”

Residents accuse the council planning department of “waiving away all objections and settling for a quick-fix road scheme offering little protection to the 11-year-olds walking to their first ‘big school’”.

One resident told Inside Croydon: “They have left them vulnerable to injury from the volume of fast-moving traffic using Coombe Road and others roads close by.”

Croydon’s planners have insisted on only providing an uncontrolled pedestrian crossing point in Melville Avenue, changing part of the road to one-way and banning access to it from the busy Coombe Road.

“None of this is sufficient to protect youngsters on their way from the tram stop and Lloyd Park car park vehicle set-down point,” according to another resident who opposed the scheme.

“Sadly, in their rush for approval, this wholly ineffective road scheme ignored that pupils need also to cross Castlemaine Avenue, which by then will be carrying an even higher volume of rat-run traffic entering it from Coombe Road.”

The current entrance to the playing fields, from Melville Avenue. This is thought to be inadequate when the school opens in September

A new in-out entrance off Coombe Road has been recommended for the school, to enable staff and pupils to arrive and depart in greater safety. Requests made at last Thursday’s planning meeting for the highways department to deliver this in time for the September opening of the school (which initially will be housed in temporary buildings) were quickly batted away by Paul Scott, the controversial chair of the planning committee, as was a call for a two-week deferment of approval to consider alternative transport plans.

Another suggestion, to install a light-controlled crossing in Coombe Road about 100 yards up from its junction with Melville Avenue, was also rejected.

With the school due to open to its first cohort in little more than six months’ time, Scott and the planning department, clearly keen to allow building work on what was until a month ago untouchable Green Belt, would not consider anything that delayed the scheme.

Croydon Council’s planning and highways departments have something of a track record of pushing through large school construction schemes with poorly considered transport plans: the Oasis Arena school went ahead despite some very reasonable objections from the residents nearby who were having the academy imposed upon them.

Of the Coombe Wood School decision, “They’ve rushed head-long into approval to meet the September opening with little regard for the safety consequences,” according to a South Croydon resident.

Even the council planners’ own report highlighted the traffic difficulties presented by having a school on the site just off Coombe Road

Meanwhile, a pre-planning application is already submitted for the school’s permanent buildings, which the committee will hear at the Town Hall this Thursday.

And today, just up the road from the school site, in the Beefeater at Coombe Lodge, there’s a public exhibition of the plans, organised by a firm of consultants with a swanky Pall Mall address.

Residents who have seen the plans for the permanent build are unsurprised that they are missing some of the safer access points that were discussed the planning meeting just a week ago. “The public document pack no longer includes a specific reference to the previously proposed new in-out access route from Coombe Road.

“Any parent of a potential Coombe Wood pupil or anyone interested in the safety of the 1,200 pupils needs to make a noise now before letting the planning committee again railroad approval without proper road safety crossing solutions greater to safeguard these young lives,” they said.


  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
  • 1 MILLION PAGE VIEWS IN 2017 (January to September)
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS 2017: Inside Croydon was source for two award-winning nominations in Private Eye magazine’s annual celebration of civic cock-ups
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
Advertisements

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Coombe Wood School, Education, Paul Scott, Planning, Schools and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Transport report for free school site rates it ‘poor’ to ‘worst’

  1. derekthrower says:

    And this report does not mention that there are three schools already located in Melville Road. Whitgift Nursery and Junior School along with the completely road transport-dependent Rutherford School. No consideration clearly has been made of the impact of this.

    Further the private Cedars, Royal Russell and Elmurst schools along with Archbishop Tenison’s are also close to this location. Good luck using the tram route along here during school opening and closing times.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Ron West says:

    Another issue is the Council Planners railroading through inappropriate blocks of 8 or 9 two-bed-or-less flats in PTAL 1b or 2 areas, in plots that previously only had a single 3 or 4 bed home on, when the London Plan specifies that “intensification” is only supposed to apply in areas of PTAL 3 or more.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. veeanne2015 says:

    The Council has a history of approving schools near/on heavily congested roads, with serious traffic fume pollution damaging the health of the children having to walk in the area anywhere near the school. Harris Primary on Purley Way for example !

    Liked by 1 person

    • That’ll be the school which was built at exceptionally high expense to keep the classrooms hermetically sealed from the noxiious air outside, and which is supposed to be a 90-pupil per year intake, and which has just 26 children on the school roll in its first year?

      Yes, the one in which the council planning department, in its report for the planning committee, quoted an unnamed “expert” as suggesting that there was no issue with air quality on the A23 stretch of the Purley Way.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Transportation report for totally free school site rates it ‘bad’ to ‘worst’. – NOVACAB

  5. Pingback: Transportation report for totally free school site rates it ‘bad’ to ‘worst’. – Tips By Cynthia

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s