CEO Negrini threatened legal action to protect The Godfather

There’s even more fall-out in the council’s botched attempt to cover-up the £787 per day IT consultant nepotism scandal

Jo Negrini: threatened legal action by the council to protect ‘The Godfather’

Jo Negrini, the council’s chief executive, threatened to use tax-payers’ money to sue this website on behalf of Graham Cadle, “The Godfather” at the centre of nepotism allegations first published by Inside Croydon.

Cadle, together with his colleagues and personal friends Karen Sullivan and Harwinder “Harry” Singh, have all left Croydon Council since the new year.

Last week, Inside Croydon published a confidential email from the chief exec, sent to elected councillors which many interpreted as a blatant attempt to “gag” them over a matter of legitimate public interest and a potential case of misfeasance of public funds.

But now we are able to reveal for the first time how Negrini has been using her public office in an effort to shut down all reporting of the matter.

In a letter dated October 26 and addressed to the website’s editor, Negrini made a clear effort to suppress our reporting of the case, in which Cadle, one of the council’s most senior executives, had authorised payments of £787 per day to IT contractor Singh.

Singh and Karen Sullivan, the council’s head of revenues and benefits, had together had a child. Cadle, Croydon’s £150,000 per year director of corporate service, was the child’s godfather. The relationship had never been declared by the trio until whistleblowers reported them last April.

Despite an internal investigation of this clear breach of the council’s code of conduct, no disciplinary action was taken and Cadle continued to hire Singh on the key council digital enabling project at a rate of pay equivalent to £200,000 per year.

The whistleblowers, frustrated at the apparent inaction over the matter, brought their evidence to Inside Croydon. The whistleblowers, as well as being in fear of losing their own jobs, were convinced that they had witnessed a high-level cover-up at Fisher’s Folly.

Harry Singh: Negrini threatened legal action to protect the £787 per day contractor

When we sent a set of questions to the chief executive, Negrini responded with an undisguised threat.

Negrini starts by using Stasi-era language, referring to the council “monitoring” the website for its reports on the conduct of her and other six-figure-salaried directors.

Negrini wrote: “As a public authority we are of course open to scrutiny…” Phew! And there were we thinking we were the ones in the wrong for asking questions about how Council Tax-payers’ money was being spent!

But what follows suggests that Negrini in fact considered herself and her senior colleagues to be above any such scrutiny.

“… What the council finds more difficult to accept is unsubstantiated statements, misinformation and personal attacks on officers where they are not in a position to defend…”.

As is common with threats of this kind, Negrini failed to specify any instances of unsubstantiated statements or personal attacks in Inside Croydon’s coverage of council matters. That’s probably because our information is usually based on the council’s own documents and on information and statements from staff and councillors.

But then Negrini’s letter took a more menacing tone.

“Where statements are a potential cause of legal action the council will not hesitate to support employees to protect their legitimate interests and privacy,” Negrini wrote.

Negrini’s threat of legal action against Inside Croydon because we reported the council’s Godfather

“It’s a clear threat of legal action, and an attempt to shut down our reporting of The Godfather affair,” Steven Downes, the website’s editor, said today.

“Yet we were reporting something which the council had already investigated, and found serious fault, but over which Negrini had failed to take any action.

“Negrini has at no time ever denied that Cadle was paying Singh at £787 per day, nor that Cadle is godfather to the child of Singh and Sullivan, nor that the trio had failed to declare this relationship. That’s because it is all true.

“We brought our information to the attention of the Borough Solicitor, who had confirmed the detail. And now Negrini was threatening us with legal action? Does this begin to look like an abuse of her public position?

Private Eye has followed the Godfather affair exhaustively, but has received no bullying threats of legal action

“Cadle, Sullivan and Singh were involved in the delivery of a digital enabling project which is many months overdue and close to £1million over-budget, and yet here Negrini was threatening to use more council money to ‘protect’ their reputations.

“Negrini’s email to councillors was a clumsy – and failed – attempt to gag our elected representatives over this matter, and has only served to prompt the question: What else is she trying to hide?”

Even last week, as news emerged of Sullivan leaving the council, senior managers in Fisher’s Folly were telling staff that the exits of the head of revenues and benefits, following Cadle and Singh in quick succession, were entirely unconnected. “We just laughed,” a council staffer told Inside Croydon. “None of us believe that.”

Others had been briefed that there was nothing unusual in the industry about paying an IT contractor £787 per day.

“Except the council’s own spreadsheets show that Harry Singh was being paid more than any other IT contractor working on the project. And we all know that Cadle hired him just after his company had gone bust, owing more than £100,000,” another council source said. “The point is: their relationship was never declared willingly, and that of itself looks suspicious.”

The failed attempt to intimidate Inside Croydon into not publishing anything further came from Negrini in response to a set of detailed questions which we had put in writing to Cadle a few days before.

Cadle, nor Negrini, have never attempted to address the questions raised.

The questions the council has refused to answer

It is not an exhaustive list by any means, but the questions represent the sort of thing some might think really deserve to be answered in a public forum, such as at a Town Hall scrutiny meeting. Or in an interview room at Croydon police station.

Given that Graham Cadle has now left the building, perhaps his boss Negrini should try to answer them on his behalf…

1, It was your decision to appoint Harry Singh to develop the MyCroydon app in 2013, even before he had registered Sensemble as a limited company or had a functioning website. When and how did you and Singh first meet?

2, Which other senior Croydon Council officials, at executive level, provided authorisation for Harry Singh to be taken on by the council after the collapse of Sensemble Ltd in November 2016? Can you provide any documentary evidence for this?

3, Which other senior Croydon Council officials, at executive level, provided authorisation for Harry Singh to be paid £787.36 per day by the council following the collapse of Sensemble Ltd in November 2016? Can you provide any documentary evidence for this?

4, When did you become godfather to the child of Harry Singh and Karen Sullivan, the head of Revenues and Benefits in your department?

5, Can you show when you first declared to your managers at Croydon Council your personal connection with Singh and Sullivan?

6, How many active projects are there in the Digital and Enabling Programme and which of these are being handled by Harry Singh?

7, What was the original budget for this work?

8, How many of those projects were completed and delivered, satisfactorily, by the deadline of June 2017?

9, How much, to date, has been spent on this work?

10, When were the snagging issues apparent in the council’s online housing repairs form first reported?

11, When do you expect these snagging issues to be resolved?

12, When were the snagging issues with council staff’s fixed penalty notice software first reported?

13, When do you expect these issues to be resolved?

14, How many staff or contractors, in your department or in IT across the council, will be losing their jobs or work as a result of the decision to off-shore Harry Singh’s MyCroydon operation to India?

15, Which other senior Croydon Council officials were also involved in signing off on the decision to offshore the MyCroydon operation to India?


  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
  • 1.4 MILLION PAGE VIEWS IN 2017
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS 2017: Inside Croydon was source for two award-winning nominations in Private Eye magazine’s annual celebration of civic cock-ups
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
Advertisements

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Croydon Council, Graham Cadle, Jo Negrini and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to CEO Negrini threatened legal action to protect The Godfather

  1. Croydon Council must disclose what payment was made to Graham “Godfather” Cadle when he left the Council following the investigation into his conduct, and also whether any payment is being made to Karen Sullivan upon her departure following the investigation into her conduct.

    This is public money, and Council Tax Payers are fully entitled to know whether their money has been used to pay off officers who have been found by the council’s own disciplinary processes to have acted wrongly, even if this fell short of gross misconduct warranting dismissal.

    Negrini seems to take the view that the best form of defence is attack……in doing so she is only drawing more attention to this scandal which is now attracting adverse publicity to her authority at national level. Her best bet would be to cut her losses and answer the legitimate questions asked of her.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I bet you were quaking in your boots at Negrini’s threat. She must surely take ultimate responsibility for this almighty cock up. You would have thought that this so called “open and honest” council would be worrying about the recent developments in the Charity sector where wrongdoings were covered up at the time, only to come out much worse further down the line.

    So who is next to depart Fisher’s Folly? I can imagine the cheer going up around the civic complex if it was Negrini.

    Liked by 2 people

    • We were going to reply to Negrini’s letter by referring her to the response provided in the case of Pressdram v Arkell. But we thought that might go over her head.

      And as to the question of who’s next to go… we have something on that in the next day or so. Watch this space.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. An excellent list of questions, all of which are relevant and in the public interest, for which you will of course get no reply. Whilst I do agree that officers employed by the Council should be provided with some protection when unfairly accused, as they have no ability to respond due to their employment. Nevertheless, Negrini needs to be careful when this case is under investigation that she is not held responsible for the ‘cover up’.
    I also feel that this shows the usual protection of officers vs contempt for Councillors that has gone on at Croydon for a long time. Certainly when I was libeled and defamed by prominent national figures there was no assistance offered to me as a leading Councillor at the time, not that I ever sought or expected any.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Nick Davies says:

    You can be certain that the individuals will have ceased employment clutching “settlement agreements” (formerly “compromise agreements”) which will have bound both sides to confidentiality on the terms and circumstances of the terminations. Expensive legal advice will have been employed in their drafting. Any divulgence from either party would be lucrative for m’learned friends.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. David Mogoh says:

    Oh I’m so pleased that Negrini is a dedicated reader (sorry, “monitor”) of this website like the rest of us.

    If you’re monitoring / reading this comment Jo – can I ask you what size you are? I’m going to buy you an Inside Croydon T-shirt myself!!! (When Mr Downes gets round to implementing my idea….)

    Liked by 2 people

  6. joeycan says:

    I wonder which of the two major local political parties will attempt to make a grab for votes at the next council elections by guaranteeing that were they to be elected one of their first priorities, (to be completed within six months of achieving office), would be to seek the resignation of Madames Negrini and Peacock?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. derekthrower says:

    An issue that appears to be forgotten about this is the action of Mr Singh in allowing the council’s live database to be accessed from India.
    The ICO provide details about what is considered a personal data breach and when it should be reported:-
    Personal data breaches can include:
    access by an unauthorised third party;
    deliberate or accidental action (or inaction) by a controller or processor;
    sending personal data to an incorrect recipient;
    computing devices containing personal data being lost or stolen;
    alteration of personal data without permission; and
    loss of availability of personal data.
    https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/personal-data-breaches/

    The Council really needs to be sure that a security incident has not taken place, otherwise if found negligent on this matter it will be liable to a substantial fine.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Charles Calvin says:

    Negrini wouldn’t last 3 months in the Private Sector and yet at Croydon Council she’s paid more that most Managing Directors. Her abilities to carry out this role is highly questionable and the remuneration she’s paid out of the public purse is excessive and unwarranted.

    Who approved her appointment?

    Yes, it’s our bloody stupid elected Councillors!!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.