CROYDON IN CRISIS: Last night’s cabinet meeting agreed to flog off 15 sites around the borough, as the council seeks to pay down its £1.5bn debt. But they will struggle to recoup the £35.7m paid for a hotel just three years ago.
By STEVEN DOWNES
The council has given the green light to flogging off the Croydon Park Hotel, potentially at another massive loss to the bankrupt borough’s coffers, as it begins probably the biggest fire-sale ever seen in south London.
The Croydon Park Hotel: likely to be sold, for the site to be used for flats
The council’s 2018 purchase of the 4-star hotel at East Croydon has proved to be hugely controversial, not least because the council leadership authorised paying £5million above the asking price for the site’s freehold.
The owners of the 210-room hotel had it on the market at £25million. Sources in the property business suggest it was being offered to potential buyers in early 2018 for £18million.
In July 2018, Tony Newman, the then council leader, and Simon Hall, his finance chief, pushed through a decision at cabinet which saw the council buy the hotel for £35.7million (including VAT). Their commercial property policy under which this purchase was made would not be agreed by the full council until October 2018.
Last year, auditors Grant Thornton, in their Report In The Public Interest, stated, “The council’s approach to borrowing and investments has exposed the council and future generations of taxpayers to significant financial risk.
“There has not been appropriate governance over the significant capital spending and the strategy to finance that spending.”
Tony Newman: authorised paying £5m over asking price for the hotel
Newman, Hall and deputy leader Alison Butler used guillotine procedures at council which, as Grant Thornton described it, meant “there was insufficient time to discuss and challenge the strategy”.
One challenge to the strategy might have been to have carried out due diligence on the company operating the hotel – who were to become the council’s tenants. In 2018, their business was already struggling.
The company which operated the hotel went bust last summer, leaving no one to pay rent to the council.
Last night, a virtual cabinet meeting agreed it was time for the council to cut its losses and flog off the hotel and another 14 sites around the borough, to help pay down the council’s debts and reduce its costs. The sale of the hotel site, the meeting was told, should go through by September.
Ozay Ali, the council’s interim director of “homes and social investment”, described the choice of properties to be flogged off as “quick wins at the start of the process”.
With covid-19 laying waste to the hotel industry, it seems highly likely that the council will seek interest from developers who want to build residential blocks on the Croydon Park Hotel’s town centre site.
The appendix to the official report last night laid out five options considered for the future of the hotel, including finding a new operator or converting the building into temporary or emergency accommodation.
The Croydon Park Hotel has been closed since last June, after its operators went bust
All were dismissed, with the exception of the sale to property speculators, with the council apparently prepared to exploit its position as local planning authority to hint heavily that consent for residential towers of 20 storeys or more will be forthcoming for any buyer.
Specialist consultancy firms advised the council, the report states, “The recovery of demand (occupancy) and room rates will take a number of years to recover to pre-pandemic levels. While the cashflows that can be derived from hotels are going to suppressed for a prolonged period, it is an attractive time to consider alternative uses.
“Given the location of the hotel, it clearly presents a significant opportunity for intensification of the large 1.54-acre site. Immediately surrounding schemes such as Altitude 25 and Pocket Living’s Addiscombe Road scheme are developed to in excess of 20 storeys.”
Only by holding out the prospect of planning permission for the site can the council have any hope of recovering even £15million-worth of the money it paid for the hotel, as Croydon embarks on a fire sale of its property assets to try to pay down its £1.5billion debt and plug the £66million covid-shaped hole in its annual budget.
According to Stuart King, the new deputy leader of the council who was bringing forward the report last night, the hotel currently represents “quite a considerable holding cost to the council”.
“It’s essential that we achieve best consideration,” King said, demonstrating mastery of the statement of the bleedin’ obvious.
Today, the council issued a statement which claimed it had a “new strategy, which is based on providing best value for taxpayers’ money”. Presumably, this is different from the old strategy, which must have been based on providing worst value for the borough’s residents.
Stuart King: opting to cut the council’s losses over the hotel
The council said, “All 15 sites are either surplus or no longer key to delivering council services, and include buildings needing major refurbishment or vacant land that could be sold for private redevelopment.”
And there will be more sales to come. The sites listed in this first tranche do not include any of the borough’s libraries (a consultation on the future of five public libraries in the borough has been extended to March 14; the council wants to close them in advance of possible sales), nor any of the waste and recycling dumps, which are also expected to be sold off in due course.
The council claimed today that, “The strategy, which will also look at the council’s wider property requirements, is designed to ensure a high level of transparency and governance around any sales.”
The council said, “Before any future sales are agreed, officers will develop a business case, receive an independent property valuation, give details of any requirements to carry out public consultation and appoint specialist estate agents to market the sites.”
The council is also looking at selling off sites and land which it had previously earmarked for development by loss-making house-builders Brick by Brick.
“The council has a number of sites we no longer need which could bring in much-needed income and reduce expensive running costs if we were to sell them,” King said.
“This strategy gives the council a clearer process around deciding how to get best value for Croydon taxpayers on selling in the right way and at the right time sites that we no longer require. We will also ensure that all buildings and land we keep are properly used and continue to meet our residents’ needs.”
Read more: Administrators accuse council of forcing hotel out of business
Read more: Council ignored five warnings on reserves
Read more: ‘Tony Newman always has been a coward’
Read more: Council company struck-off over admin error
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and BBC London News
- ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named the country’s rottenest borough in 2020 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine – the fourth successive year that Inside Croydon has been the source for such award-winning nominations
- Inside Croydon: 3million page views in 2020. Seen by 1.4million unique visitors
With all the talk about zero carbon emissions being needed maybe the council should set an example and make some requirements for environmentally friendly materials, etc, be used by property developers of the hotel and other sites, and if at all possible hold a competition for a shortlist of designs so that local people can vote on the favourite.
Did we just read the same article?
Given Croydon is “15minutes from Gatwick”, how about a quarantine hotel?
What a dystopia.
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE confirm for me why the people who made this decision circumventing due process and any form of logic are not being prosecuted and standing in the firing line? The gall to subsequently be so brazen about the act makes me so angry.
I work in real estate lending and rarely see any investor purchasing an investment of the size of the Croydon Park Hotel without taking & more importantly paying for advice. The advice would have been available from any valuation firm and they would have happily advised that purchasing the hotel was beyond daft.
Now add that this was carried out by someone knowingly operating out of their depth with PUBLIC FUNDS I am at a loss.
Anyone else having similar thoughts?
I understand the advice was there and they ignored it. The advice was don’t touch this hotel with a barge pole.
I find the arrogance and recklessness with which they spend public money unfathomable. Those who were at the centre of this decision and took Tony’s purse in order to give it support must be named and removed from public office.
We know who they are anyway.
We do know who they are and they are brazenly still at the heart of power. The buddied up with a despot who walked away into the sunset with a fat bank balance. Disgraceful.
Laughing stock of London boroughs.
Sack the remaining lot of directors to remove the rot.
Where can I read what the CEO and others master plan for all these purchases?
Obviously the the CEO had worked on other borough regenerations. What was Croydon Master Plan before Covid? What is the overall master plan now with/out Covid? I would like to understand and be involved with the recovery, selling off sorts the budget short term but medium to long term?
Maybe decision making structure should openly include the people; local residents, businesses, organisations etc. I think that themed working groups that feed into a forum are possibly the way forward; to enable real discussion and balance of power. Funded by the money intended to seek info about having a Mayor that still gives the power to just one person.
You can fool some people, sometimes, but you can’t fool all the people, all the time.
I’m very wary of government by focus group, or communities (yes I know) consortium, or similar such self selecting bodies. Like the Question Time audience they tend to attract some rather unsavoury characters and the outcome may be no better than letting the existing set of unsavoury characters run things.
What do people suggest then? We have to start to balance the power somehow. Where do we get the chance to regularly suggest/discuss/ give feedback to change our neighbourhoods, through debate, decision making forums, collectives, people’s voice panels whatever that feeds into the council decision making structure?
Mr Newman, Mrs Butler et Al should be given a community service order forcing them to run the Hotel until it makes a profit again. Like when Laurel and Hardy couldn’t pay their hotel bill and they had to work in the kitchens till it was all paid off.