‘Corrupt’ selection process rejects second Labour councillor

CROYDON IN CRISIS: An elected councillor has described his party’s local election selection process as ‘flawed and corrupt’, as it emerges that Mary Croos has joined Jamie Audsley in being rejected as a candidate for 2022.

Inside Croydon has learned that a second sitting Labour councillor in Croydon faces deselection after failing to pass the local party’s panelling process ahead of the May 2022 Town Hall elections.

Mary Croos, who has been an elected representative for Fairfield ward since 2018, did not pass the interview for prospective candidates.

“To some extent, it is hardly surprising,” according to our source in the local party.

“She’s not known as ‘Silent Mary’ for nothing. We’ve heard hardly a peep from her in almost four years as a councillor.”

In 2018, when helping to win the re-configured town centre Fairfield ward from the Tories, Croos became the first woman with a Tamil heritage to be elected on to Croydon Council.

Happy days: Mary Croos when elected as a Labour councillor, alongside Keir Starmer and Steve Reed

It is understood that Croos has appealed against the decision of her interview panel that she should not be endorsed as a Labour candidate in next year’s elections.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, given her “Silent Mary” nickname, Croos had not responded to Inside Croydon’s request for a comment by the time of publication.

What makes the Labour officials’ judgement on a sitting Labour councillor seem quite so odd is that the party in Croydon has been crying out for potential women candidates.

Labour’s gender balance rules makes it a requirement that every ward in the borough should have at least one woman among the party’s candidates. Croydon has 28 wards, but Labour received only 29 candidate applications from women.

Applications were re-opened to try to encourage more women to apply: just 10 did so.

Despite this paucity of Croydon women wanting to stand for election as Labour candidates, Inside Croydon understands that the interview panel – made up of senior Labour councillors from elsewhere in London – not only rejected Councillor Croos’ application, but also that of her daughter, who is also called Mary.

It may be that Councillor Croos’ contribution to the council’s work during her three years at the Town Hall was not considered strong enough.

But given the “achievements” of a large proportion of the Labour group on the council in bankrupting the borough and exhibiting “corporate blindness” over the authority’s financial failings, questions are being asked how several other sitting councillors have possibly survived the selection process.

If Croos’s appeal is unsuccessful, she will become the second Labour backbench councillor to have been rejected by the party’s selection process, following Jamie Audsley.

Today, one of Labour’s 41 councillors told Inside Croydon on condition of anonymity, “I think Jamie has been treated disgracefully by the Labour Party.

Good enough for Labour: this was the ‘top team’ at Croydon Town Hall in 2018. While two backbenchers have been blocked, six of these will be local election candidates again in 2022

“There is absolutely nothing to justify his deselection – especially when compared to the highly dubious conduct of some other Labour councillors who did get through the panel.”

The councillor highlighted instances of a veteran colleague – and former chief whip –  actually breaking the Town Hall whip and voting with the Tories and against party policy.

“If Jamie Audsley and others have been unsuccessful for no apparent reason, it beggars belief that Pat Ryan should get through when he openly voted with the Tories in the Traffic Management Advisory Committee to block his own party’s proposals for the Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood Low Traffic Neighbourhoods,” the councillor said.

“It’s difficult to reach any conclusion other than the selection process is flawed and corrupt.”

Read more: Labour councillor was given ‘no real reason’ for deselection
Read more: Town Hall leadership hatched plan to break election budget

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named the country’s rottenest borough in 2020 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine – the fourth successive year that Inside Croydon has been the source for such award-winning nominations
  • Inside Croydon: 3million page views in 2020. Seen by 1.4million unique visitors

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in 2022 council elections, Fairfield, Mary Croos, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to ‘Corrupt’ selection process rejects second Labour councillor

  1. Bob Newman says:

    Fairfield has two corrupt Labour Councillors who should be kicked off the Council, out of the Labour Party, and probably belong in jail. So they deselect Mary? Wow.

  2. Ash Barber says:

    Agree with the decision we need honest councillors who are active members in the community, and actually contribute to governance. Also due process such as interviews needs to be followed, no more automatic selection based on token box ticking such as gender or ethnic heritage- and certainly not nepotism! Plenty of female candidates who are vocal about important local issues, find them and let’s clean up Croydon!

Leave a Reply