No government checks on council’s borrowing for 15 years

CROYDON IN CRISIS: Scandals and revelations from other busted boroughs demonstrate a deliberate lack of diligence by the Tory government

No controls: the scandal at Thurrock, as uncovered by the BIJ, highlights the lack of financial controls over local councils

Government failures to keep a check on the runaway borrowing of Croydon and other local authorities is likely to come under additional scrutiny, as further scandals emerge.

Last week’s Panorama looked at the basket case borough of Thurrock, where it has accumulated debts of £1.3billion after the council’s finance director had “unlimited authority to invest in anything he felt fit”.

Mostly, this involved shovelling public money towards a series of investment schemes brokered by dodgy businessman Liam Kavanagh, who is reckoned to have skimmed off at least £130million which he spent on flash cars, a country estate, private jet and luxury yacht.

The BBC programme was based on three years’ worth of digging by Gareth Davies, the former Croydon Advertiser reporter now editor of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

The programme highlighted the absence of any proper, external scrutiny from Whitehall, and drew comparisons with Croydon (where the accumulated debt is £1.6billion) and other failing councils.

These include Woking, which has a revenue budget of £16million yet has eye-watering debts of £1.8billion, mostly accrued through borrowing from the Government’s Public Works Loan Board – which failed to carry out any checks on the Surrey council’s loans for 15 years.

This absence of any due diligence or scrutiny from the local government lenders was revealed at a conference last month by Brendan Arnold, who took over as Woking’s interim finance director in March, just weeks before the authority became the sixth council to issue a Section 114 notice since 2020.

Minimalising: Michael Gove is trying to pretend there’s only a few councils in crisis

Arnold said delays in getting audits signed off had contributed to Woking’s debt getting so large. Croydon currently has three sets of annual accounts that have not been passed by its auditors.

“Woking has not had an opinion from its external auditor on its financial accounts since 2018,” according to Arnold.

“This is a long time ago, and I would expect that had that been in place, perhaps the size and value of the Section 114 we’ve seen in Woking would have been significantly smaller,” he said.

Arnold said that Woking’s borrowing from the PWLB had begun in 2007-2008, and began to accelerate in 2016. “It wasn’t until 2022 that anyone from the Public Works Loan Board phoned up to enquire what was going on in Woking.”

Michael Gove, the Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, meanwhile continues to try to claim that the cases of Thurrock, Woking, Croydon and others are somehow isolated instances and nothing to do with 13 years of Tory Government deliberate under-funding all local councils.

“Big” Eric Pickles, one of Gove’s cabinet predecessors, started the rot with his Localism Act which removed the District Auditor – and essential safety net for struggling councils – as well as other “reforms”.

It is becoming increasingly clear that it is the DLUHC, and Gove himself, who have been at fault for the wretched state many councils, including Conservative-run authorities, have found themselves in.

Gove has recently increased the powers of the improvement panel he appointed to oversee Croydon’s travails, so that it now “instructs” how the council spends its money, rather than simple “guides”, thus rendering the borough’s £82,000 per year Mayor Jason Perry powerless. But not before Gove allowed Perry to hike Council Tax by 15per cent, passing on yet more pain to hard-pressed residents.

Such Council Tax increases might have been avoidable if Gove and his department had been doing their jobs properly. A panel of experts brought together by the DLUHC to determine whether local authorities’ governance and accountability framework was “fit for purpose” has failed to meet since November 2021. With Gove’s latest quango, Oflog, about to get to work, the “local authority accountability framework review panel” is being quietly wound-up.

It has also emerged that Gove’s department is handing back £1.9billion to the Treasury that was originally meant to tackle England’s housing crisis, after struggling to find projects to spend it on.

The Inside Housing website estimates that by not allocating the cash, DLUHC has wasted an opportunity to build 5,000 homes in the middle of a housing crisis.

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at
  • As featured on Google News Showcase
  • Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SIXTH successive year in 2022 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Council Tax, Croydon Council, Section 114 notice and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to No government checks on council’s borrowing for 15 years

  1. Ian Kierans says:

    Still waiting for an answer to the FOI on this Councils borrowing!

  2. Ian Kierans says:

    it is fundamentally clear that the values so espoused by Conservatives have been betrayed as fallacy in the examples of how they have rampantly run public finances, cut policing and enforcement to tatters that anything less that very violant crimes to murder or miemeanours those against ” establishment or influential people” are mostly the top priorities.
    If you have a burglary or assault even with harm to body and criminal damage robbery in the street there is just not the resource to even answer with a week.

    This Conservative 13 years has been Forget Europe, Forget immigration, Forget Crime, Forget the Economy Forget Climate change, Forget promises in Manifesto’s – Forget prudent public administration (Haha Croydon has become the byword of how not to do that!)

    The root causes of all the above failures are all poor Conservative policy and their implementation and the removal of regulations and regulators that could and should ahve prevented it.

    Has Labour in Croydon done any better – No! it stupidly followed suit because it could, with narry a thought as to the downsides – wastefully also pissing up the wall a whole generations future.

    Local politic’s and politicians have got to get better at what they do or know their limitations and seek expert advice. Failures at local level affect generations of development – they should not be focusing on cherry politic’s but engendering lasting benefit to the Borough through effective, costed, and reasonable interventions that bring long term benefit whilst managing the year to year mandatory and statutory tasks.

  3. derek thrower says:

    The dismantling of statutory oversight of huge amounts of public debt demonstrate that the Conservative Party are not the party of sound public finance. They are the authors of this financial recklessness and the enormity of the problems have been known for some considerable time and they have still failed to come up with a solution to how to unravel the exposure to these ruinous amounts of debts. In the old days economic expansion could be relied upon to dilute and run down such burdens, but that’s the problem with this Regime. This is no longer an option that is deliverable.

  4. Sarah Gills says:

    When austerity first kicked in, the Tories actively encouraged local councils to be “more commercial”. They didn’t explain what they meant while removing funding. Councils still need to care for vulnerable adults so had make money and did naive and desperate things. Croydon for example had a
    Finance director who had no previous experience (same at chief exec level), and I’ll informed politicians. Look what happened as a result.

  5. Lewis White says:

    It looks like some Boroughs collectively get into deep water, and that Committees have agreed to unwise investments, not just “Strong Leaders” .

    Others fall victim to high-powered, highly paid, senior officers who are so charismatic that they become untouchable, and that no one individual within the organisation can query this unless they are brave enough to risk their own job and reputation.

    Very nasty– the hardmen and women, and the bully boys and girls–end up the winners, in too many cases, I would guess.

    The removal of the national controls of the Audit Commission, and the Standards Board, took away powerful authorities who were not involved in the local power politics.

    The politicians nationally as well did not like these national bodies….. too powerful.

    I don’t think that it was just Conservatives like Pickles who decided to close down the two I have mentioned above.

    Time to bring back external checks and balances…… the task is too important to leave to the councils alone.

Leave a Reply