The Metropolitan Police has courted further controversy when Scotland Yard issued a statement describing as “a huge setback” the conviction for assault of one of its constables over last summer’s controversial arrest of a black woman bus passenger on Whitehorse Road in Croydon.
Guilty: Met constable Perry Lathwood was found guilty of assault. He may yet appeal
PC Perry Lathwood was today found guilty at Westminster Magistrates Court of assault during the wrongful arrest of Jocelyn Agyemang last July, in scenes which were videoed and widely shared on social media, while the woman’s young son, clearly in some distress, watched on.
The court heard that PC Lathwood “manhandled” Agyemang and called her a “daft cow”. PC Lathwood will be sentenced at the same court on June 14.
The incident occurred during a fare evasion operation conducted jointly with Transport for London. Similar operations, and ticket inspections, were suspended entirely by TfL on buses in Croydon for almost a month afterwards. The Met has not taken part in any such operations since.
“This verdict is a huge setback to our ability to rebuild trust with Londoners,” according to Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist.
“We will learn the lessons from this and we apologise to the woman and the wider community who were deeply affected.
“Anyone who has seen the footage of this incident will be upset by how it escalated into a traumatic situation for a mother and her child.
“Despite today’s conviction, we will continue to support the officer and continue to support our workforce, to ensure officers have the confidence to act decisively and make arrests when they believe they have the powers to do so.”
PC Lathwood, from Sussex, was attached to the Met’s Roads and Transport Policing Command. The prosecution was brought following an investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct, after the Met had referred itself to the independent arbiter.
Controversial: the Met’s Twitter statement – based on a longer comment from AC Matt Twist – is unlikely to win many friends
AC Twist said: “When an officer is convicted of a criminal offence, their conviction will often be considered at an accelerated misconduct hearing as soon as possible after proceedings have finished.
“In this case we will wait to hear if PC Lathwood will appeal the conviction, and work to fully understand the decision of the court and its implications for policing. We do not intend to consider an accelerated misconduct hearing in this case.”
And the Assistant Commissioner added: “The nature of this kind of fare evasion operation unnecessarily places officers in potentially challenging interactions with the public.
“Since this incident happened, we have stopped our involvement in supporting Transport for London fare evasion operations, but we continue our presence on the bus network tackling violent crime.”
During the one-day court hearing held last week, Agyemang told the court she felt “very violated” after being handcuffed and was left with pain in her wrist, arm and a bruised shoulder.
Passing judgment, Deputy Senior District Judge Tan Ikram said it was “not necessary to grab the woman’s arm, arrest her and handcuff her”.
The judge said: “There were not reasonable grounds to suggest arrest was necessary. The officer made an error of judgment and overreacted.”
During the trial, Paul Jarvis, prosecuting, said Agyemang was dropping her son off at her mother’s house on July 21 last year before heading to an appointment in Marylebone scheduled for 12.30pm.
After she and her son disembarked the bus at around 11am, she was asked to show she had paid her fare by a bus inspector. “She does not hand it over and she walks off,” Jarvis told the court. “It is at this moment that PC Lathwood becomes involved.”
Most of what happened was captured on the officers’ body cams and by the bus’s CCTV, as well as being videoed by passers-by.
Set-back: Assistant Commissioner Matt Twist
The prosecuting lawyer said PC Lathwood put a hand on her, but she moved away, so he then grabbed her arm and arrested her for fare evasion.
In footage played to the court, Agyemang could be heard asking the officer: “Can you get off me, please? Can you get off my arm? You don’t understand, I have done nothing wrong.”
Jarvis said PC Lathwood continued to hold her, demanding she tap her Oyster card. He also handcuffed her. Another officer took her Oyster card from her hand and went away with it to see if she had paid.
She was “de-arrested” at the scene after it was confirmed that Agyemang had paid her fare.
“I just remember the strong grip,” Agyemang said in evidence. “When someone is holding me, especially when I feel like I have done nothing wrong, it is very scary for me.”
When asked why she walked off, Agyemang said: “At the time I was just thinking about getting to my mother’s house.”
She was asked why she “resisted” the police when stopped. “I honestly don’t see it as resisting,” she told the court.
The IOPC’s Mel Palmer said, “Any use of force by officers should be reasonable, proportionate and justifiable in the circumstances.
“This was a high-profile incident that caused significant concern, particularly in the Croydon community, after footage of the incident was published online.”
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
It’s an utter disgrace that this Officer was prosecuted, let alone convicted.
The woman repeatedly refused to show her Oyster card to a Revenue Protection Officer, to prove that she had paid. She was the root cause of this incident, by “acting up” and delaying all the passengers on the bus. The RPO was required to take action, resulting in the involvement of the police.
This all makes sense, but doesn’t excuse the heavy-handedness. Who’d be a copper with the threat of social media warriors wading in filming the scenes and whipping the crowd into a frenzy then posting the images? It all inflames racial tensions and prejudices any fair trial. What a sad world we live in.
So a young black mum is bruised and handcuffed in front of her kid over a £1.75 bus fare and for being in a hurry? I wasn’t there, but that does not sound reasonable or ‘proportionate’ to me. It has to be pretty stark for the IOPC to recommend prosecution. Sad to see the Met refusing to acknowledge even the possibility that one of their finest got it wrong. I thought Rowley was making a difference, but this smacks of the Cressida Dick and Sarah Everard era….. All they had to say was ‘We understand the officer intends to appeal, and will make no comment until the legal process concludes.’
£1.75 doesn’t sound a lot but TfL’s most recent annual estimate of fare evasion (2022-23) across all of its public transport modes is 3.9 per cent, which equates to around £130 – £150m in unpaid journeys. This comes out of our pockets.
Many fare dodgers are serial repeat offenders.
What was he supposed to do? Let her walk away? All she had to do was show a pass which would have taken a couple of seconds! We’ve all been asked to show our tickets at many times and have happily complied.
Perry Lathwood is not one of the Met’s finest! He has a lot of previous.
Strange how this violent policing keeps happening to black people – Chris Kaba, Bianca Williams etc.
Perhaps those that advocate that the police officer allow her to walk away without demonstrating she had paid, can answer what they might think the world might look like if they extend that approach to all crime.
You cannot have it both ways. Either people can just walk away whilst there is suspicion of a crime – or – people can be detained in order that they do not escape before it can be established whether a crime has been committed.
I realised there will be those with muddled thinking that will retort “oh but its just a ticket”, in which case where do we draw the line for detaining a person ? Ticket evasion, theft from a shop, non-violent burglary, theft from the person, assault, wounding, grevious bodily harm, manslaughter, murder ?
Each person will have their own “red line” and that is the crux of the problem with those that are not able to comprehend that a law must be applied universally (for the smallest thing) or not at all.
Reading some of these comments, it is no surprise to me why London is going downhill.
But isn’t this case, which has been determined in a court of law, about the police officer’s conduct?
yes. the court of law is always correct – as you rightly imply.
I forgot to mention that if you place this officers name into google along with the term Sussex, you will find an issue that genuinely does need address and to which this chap should have been asked some probing questions, but that is another thing entirely.
Maybe I missed something. Googled as you suggested and found nowt of note. Please elucidate.
Check out the Inside Croydon Twitter feed from the past 48 hours, Dan…