CROYDON IN CRISIS: Halfway through his term of office, and the executive Mayor has broken cross-party understandings to dodge scrutiny – appointing a climate crisis sceptic to chair the council’s environment scrutiny committee. WALTER CRONXITE, political editor, reports
Marking his own homework: Mayor Jason Perry has been compared to a dictator
It took Jason Perry, Croydon’s part-time Mayor, less than half his term of office to break one of the most important pledges he made over future governance of the council, installing fellow Tories as chairs of the Town Hall’s scrutiny committees to dodge accountability, according to opposition councillors.
Perry has been accused of “marking his own homework” and being likened to a dictator.
“There was cross-party agreement after the council’s financial collapse in 2020 that scrutiny committees should in future be chaired by someone not from the same party as the council administration,” a Katharine Street source said today.
“So what has Perry done? He’s broken a four-way cross-party agreement and installed a Conservative climate change sceptic as his chair of the scrutiny committee that deals with the environment, and installed another Tory, someone who has been on the council for less than a month, as chair of the children and young people sub-committee.”
The row in the Town Hall corridors has been caused not only because of Perry’s attempt to cling on to more power to himself, but also because council staff and lawyers have failed to complete a new constitution reflecting the changed model of running the council, almost three years since it was decided to switch to an elected, executive Mayor.
The reshuffle of scrutiny roles for 2024-2025 was decided by Perry and his close advisers ahead of last week’s annual council meeting.
The bad old days: having an autocrat like Tony Newman running the council led to the borough going bankrupt
Behind-the-scenes horse-trading was going on right to the last minute, with the finalised paperwork, including details of all the jobs – and the juicy allowances that go with them – not released until less than two hours before the meeting.
It was a throwback to the bad old days, when “strong leaders” like Labour’s Tony Newman and Conservative Mike Fisher before him would carve up council jobs in return for absolute, unquestioning loyalty from councillors.
For this new, civic year, there have been no changes to the roles of Mayor Perry’s cabinet – a collection of eight councillors who get paid close to £40,000, for doing not very much…
But the “enthronement” of Richard Chatterjee (Who he? Ed) as deputy ceremonial mayor (20 grand a year for wearing fancy dress and cutting the occasional village fete ribbon) had left a vacancy for the vice-chair of scrutiny.
Two years in to his four-year term, and with Labour councillor Rowenna Davis generally impressing as the independently minded, questioning-everything chair of scrutiny, Perry and his little brains trust clearly thought that the Tories needed to toughen their positioning on scrutiny, to avoid being caught out too often.
Thus, Alasdair Stewart was moved sideways, from a deputy cabinet role (meaning no role at all in reality), to scrutiny vice-chair.
New move: Alasdair Stewart
Being vice-chair probably won’t see Stewart get to oversee the running of any of the over-arching scrutiny and overview committee meetings. The council papers last week explain as much: “In the absence of the chair, the deputy chair will be nominated to chair the meeting”, meaning that in Davis’s absence, another Labour councillor, Leila Ben-Hassel, will run the meetings.
But Stewart, first elected to the council in 2022, is generally acknowledged by Katharine Street insiders as a tougher prospect than his predecessor Chatterjee.
It was when it came to the various scrutiny sub-comittees that Perry and the Tories decided to rip up the short-lived agreement that opposition councillors should chair meetings, and instead putting right-wing “anti-woke” figure Stewart in charge of streets and environment scrutiny, and barrister Andrew Price, the Park Hill and Whitgift by-election winner earlier this month, overseeing the children’s sub-committee.
Twelve months ago, in an unusually progressive move by Croydon Council standards, the composition of the environment scrutiny sub-committee was expanded from six to seven, keeping three Conservative and three Labour members, but accommodating Green councillor Ria Patel, who came in as chair.
With the increasingly-puce Perry under increasing pressure for his pro-car policies, and caught in a series of porkie pies when negotiating with a private golf club over possible disposal of council-owned Green Belt land, the Mayor moved to depose Patel with little debate or discussion.
Marginalised: Croydon’s three minority party councillors are kept well away from any of the big-ticket committees, such as planning, appointments or general purposes
Croydon’s two Greens and LibDem councillors have repeated complained at the manner in which they have been marginalised and silenced over the past two years, mostly by the autocratic executive Mayor, but also sometimes with the collusion of Labour who, with 34 councillors, are the biggest single group on the council and clearly want to keep things that way.
With the environment scrutiny sub-committee this year, one of the back-room deals suggested was that Labour should give up one of their three places at the meetings to make way for a Green councillor. They refused.
Mayor Perry has used his position to block the Greens and LibDem from even being able to speak or ask questions at other Town Hall meetings.
A week earlier, Patel was refused any opportunity to ask questions of Mayor Perry at the latest cabinet meeting, something the councillor said “is deliberate silencing and an example of bad leadership”.
Patel says that she was denied an opportunity to ask just two questions, despite having emailed days in advance. She was only told of her exclusion less than three hours before the meeting.
The reason given for Perry not having to face Patel’s questions? “The interests of the efficient and effective management of cabinet business.” The meeting presided over by part-time Perry – which might usually run for three hours – was all done and dusted within an hour and 10 minutes.
‘Mayor Perry is trying to dodge scrutiny and accountability’
Patel tweeted that she wished “Croydon had a committee system rather than a dictator… sorry, I mean, Mayor”.
She added, “Mayor Perry claims he wants to collaborate and work cross-party. After two years of being consistently blocked, this is even more obviously a farce.
“Working collaboratively, imagine that?
Questions blocked: Green Party councillor Ria Patel
“Effective cabinet business involves proper questioning and scrutiny. A good leader, of any political group, should recognise this.”
Patel says that she realises that her Labour council colleagues are seriously compromised because of the failures of the 2014-2022 administration. “Most questions that Labour shadow cabinet members ask are met with a way in which ‘the previous administration’ screwed up.”
Then came last week’s annual meeting. “The Croydon Mayor seeks to hide from failure to deliver on climate action by removing me as chair of street and environment scrutiny and appointing someone from his own party,” said Patel, clearly furious at the power move.
“It is exactly this fear of effective challenge from opposition parties that has caused so many issues for Croydon in recent years.
“Opposition parties are best placed to chair scrutiny and this is when best value is achieved. Having someone from the Mayor’s own party is like them marking their own homework.
“This move is intended to allow the Mayor to dodge accountability and avoid scrutiny.”
Today, Patel, speaking exclusively to Inside Croydon, said, “Two years since Greens and a Lib Dem were elected to Croydon Council, there remains many outdated parts of Croydon’s constitution.
“The Tories will tell you that the constitution has been updated to fit the Mayoral model. But it has retained much of the old council’s system, ignoring the changes in Croydon’s political makeup in 2022. Both Conservatives and Labour have delayed discussions which would make the constitution more reflective of the current council’s makeup. Many changes are needed – and this isn’t helped by the last-minute cancelling of constitution working group meetings.
“There’s no appetite or urgency to change the constitution: they want the Greens silenced because we are effective and listen to residents. Included in this silencing is not letting us put forward motions to full council, and Mayor Perry constantly refusing to allow me to ask questions at cabinet – with a different excuse each time.
“I believe scrutiny should be chaired by opposition parties and replacing me with a Tory is marking your own homework.
“Perry is halfway through his term and it’s clear that the Tories feel threatened. Mayor Perry is trying to dodge scrutiny and accountability – a big reason for how Croydon ended up in a massive mess in the first place.”
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
FREE ADS: Paid-up subscribers to Inside Croydon qualify for a free ad for their business, residents’ association or community group, just one of the benefits of being part of our online community. For more information about being an iC subscriber, click here for our Patreon page
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our near 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, which is featured on Google News Showcase and followed by 16,000 on Twitter/X, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
Who would have thought that by electing a dicktator (sic) it would result in these shenanigans? Democ didn’t, that’s for sure. “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”, as Lord Acton once said.
There is clear legislation setting out the need for political balance on both the council’s committees and scrutiny committees.
Cllr Patel seems to forget she is only one of 70 council members, and yet has been given far more opportunities to speak and ask questions at council meetings than is proportionate – because both the Conservatives and Labour believe that is the right thing to do. But those extra opportunities come at the expense of other elected councillors from all parties – who have equally as much entitlement to speak and ask questions in behalf of their residents.
But beyond that, if the Greens want more representation and speaking time, might I suggest the Greens find some sensible candidates who can win some more seats?
Election advice. From a Tory. Rich.
He’s a smug patronising pillock. That’s why he’s a Tory councillor
“What did you do in the climate emergency, Grandpa?”
“Well, I denied, delayed and dithered, but when I wasn’t doing that I was busy making sure I kept that pesky young Green woman in her place, so she can’t make the rest of us look bad. Asking pointed questions about sustainability and net zero, daring to hold our Mayor accountable, the temerity of it. It’s all about the residents, you see, even if only a third of them can be bothered to vote.”
IC is right to hold Matyor Perry’s feet to the fire – no one else is doing it. But I’m still full of joy that the process that brought him into his well-upholstered seat also got rid of the corrupt Labour cadre of Newman and his cronies. As the blessed Margaret one called out – ‘rejoice’!
But it didn’t.
Newman resigned in early 2021, long before there was even a mayoral referendum.
Numpties remain, often in key positions.
And is Perry any different? Perry was the cabinet member who oversaw CCURV, the property vehicle that flopped and gave us Fisher’s Folly (gold taps and leaky sinks, and more costly than the Shard).
It was Perry who hired Negrini.
And he’s showing similar autocratic traits.
Seems we not only have to scrutinise piss-poor Perry, but nudge Myers’ memory.