In the biggest potential change to the way we vote in Britain for more than 50 years, the Labour Party is proposing to lower the voting age from 18 to 16 if they form the government after tomorrow’s General Election. ELSIE GOWERS asked local teenagers who won’t have a vote tomorrow how they feel about the proposal
Putting the bite into politics: for many under-18s, the closest they get to elections is if their schools are used as polling stations
“If you can work, if you can pay tax, if you can serve in the armed forces, then you ought to be able to vote,” Keir Starmer announced early in the General Election campaign Labour’s plan to lower the voting age to 16, catching the attention of young people all over the country.
Voting systems will never be more to the forefront of the public’s mind than tomorrow, General Election day. Some say that changing the voting age, as they have done already in Scotland and Wales, could significantly impact the outcome of future UK elections and referendums. Others say that due to the disinterest in politics that is common in young people, the decision would have minimal effect.
The last time that there was a significant change in UK-wide voting age was in 1969, when under Harold Wilson’s Labour government, the minimum age to vote was lowered from 21 to 18.
The first time that 16- and 17-year-old Scots were able to vote was in the Scottish independence referendum of 2014. Following this, the Electoral Commision released a report that suggested 75% of 16- and 17-year-olds actively used their votes compared to only 54% of 18-to-24-year-olds. The results from the 2021 Scottish parliamentary election suggested that those who were enfranchised at the age of 16 were more likely to continue voting in their 20s.
However, there is a concern that with a lowered voting age for the whole of the UK, many younger voters would lack the knowledge and understanding of the political system to make an informed decision on how to vote.
This was a key issue brought up by the selection of teenagers I spoke to.
Teagan, 17, a post-GCSE school leaver in employment and training, said, “It’s not talked about a lot in school. I’ve never learned any politics.” She said that she does not know “what each party stands for, or even where I would go to vote”.
Votes at 16: Labour’s proposal is a vote-winner, just with people too young to vote
She suggests that schools could, “Introduce political parties in assemblies or lessons and make sure that young people know what they stand for.”
Teagan does believe that with better education on politics, the voting age being lowered to 16 is a good idea. She urges older voters to consider “how they would feel being 16 in this day and age, with no say on the things going on around us” including the “terrible” cost of living crisis.
Jess, 17, a state school sixth form pupil, would have “loved to” be voting in the 2024 General Election as she feels she feels she is “fully aware” of how she could use her vote.
“It is our future that it affects,” she said. She wants “to have a say in what government we have”.
She said: “We are old enough to serve in the army and can pay taxes but don’t have any choice in how the money gets spent.”
Jess feels that she has been well educated about politics at school, however she is mindful that she takes A level politics and suggests that “people who don’t take politics as a subject probably haven’t had enough education on it”.
Isabelle, another 17-year-old midway through her A level course, believes that a lower voting age “could negatively impact the Conservatives”, as they “focus a lot less on young people” with their policies.
She would definitely have voted tomorrow had she been allowed to. “Young people should have a right to vote as they are likely to be affected,” by the outcome of the election.
However, Isabelle also feels that “a lot needs to change” in schools for young people to be more confident in their ability to vote. She shared that she has “never had any lessons on the voting system or politics in general”.
So while lowering the voting age might be a positive move to engage younger people in the democratic process, for this to work effectively, education on politics at a young age needs to improve.
- Elsie Gowers is an A-level pupil whose subjects include politics, undertaking work experience at Inside Croydon
Why vote? Listen to our special edition of The Croydon Insider podcast, where our panel of experts answer young people’s questions about the importance of taking part in the General Election on July 4 – this episode is FREE to download from Spotify or our Patreon page. For more details, and links, click here now
Read more: ‘All I see is a divided country, with more racism and more upset’
Read more: The fundamental dishonesty around this dog-whistle election
Read more: This is Tory Britain in 2024: ‘Sometimes you’ve got to be cruel’
For more information on where to vote on July 4 – if you are over 18 – and who is standing for election, use our widget here:
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
If lowering the age caused parties to start courting the young for their votes, would it result in better ‘long-term’ policies?
I’m just in favour of reducing the age of voting as there are plenty of people who are well over 18 who don’t feel they know what they are voting for. So long as people can choose not to vote, if they don’t feel happy that they don’t have enough info they can just not vote. Although, given the amount of information that is out there, there’s plenty of ways to find out what the different political parties and candidates think. There’s bound to be a candidate standing in your area with whom you share enough in common to vote for.
What I think is more important is changing the minimum age of criminal responsibility and how we treat under age criminals. But that is a different subject.
I think a good gauge of who you should vote for is to choose whoever you would most like to have a pint with at the pub.
At 18 I was pretty clueless about who to vote for, I didn’t have much experience of the world. I was more concerned with going out with my mates and having a good time than studying political party manifestoes – yawn, snore.
You’re going to be voting for Farridge, aren’t you Moya?
Luckily there are a few others to choose from.