Rivers charity begins a Judicial Review, accusing the environment secretary of having ‘no policy at all’ for solving the crisis around Thames Water
Out of his depth: Streatham and Croydon North MP Steve Reed now faces a Judicial Review over water policy
Environment secretary Steve Reed, the MP for Streatham (and Croydon North, if he can ever be bothered) could be dragged into court by a rivers charity which has accused him of an unlawful failure to publish his policy on taking failing water companies into temporary nationalisation.
Lawyers for River Action argue that Thames Water has breached its duties and violated its licence conditions seriously and repeatedly, making it the clearest possible case for special administration.
Reed has come under fire even from senior figures in the Labour Party this month, as they have joined calls from celeb environomentalist Feargal Sharkey and others to re-nationalise basketcase utility company Thames Water, following the environment secretary’s soggy mess of a water reform review.
Sharkey, the former Undertones frontman, called for Reed’s resignation on live TV after the government-commissioned Cunliffe Review failed to recommend re-nationalising the privatised regional monopolies – largely because Reed deliberately excluded considering such an option when setting the terms for the review.
Reed was also caught out using data commissioned from water companies to argue that re-nationalisation would be too costly.
Now River Action has joined the Reed critics.
Reed has said that the government is stepping up preparations to take Thames Water into special administration, indicating he will reject pleas from the company’s creditors for leniency from fines and penalties.
Special administration is a temporary insolvency and restructuring process for companies that provide essential public services such as water, energy and transport, intended to ensure continuity of service while the company is restructured.
Sinking fast: a rivers charity argues that Thames Water’s pollution offences offer grounds for special administration
Thames Water’s largest creditors control the utility and have made efforts to cut some of its debts and have offered to provide £5.3billion in new funding to try to turn it around.
But River Action’s Emma Dearnaley said the time to use the special administration regime process is now.
“Enough is enough. Why hasn’t the secretary of state used special administration to fix the water sector, starting with Thames Water?
“The government has the power but won’t use it, or even explain when it might trigger this process. Apparently, the government has no policy at all. That’s a fundamental failure of transparency and accountability, and it’s unlawful.”
River Action has lodged an application for a Judicial Review, naming Reed as secretary of state as the respondent.
The claim argues that the government has failed to publish its policy on when it would use the SAR process, breaching core public law duties, and that ministers have failed to develop a policy at all, breaching obligations under habitats regulations and other planning and environmental laws.
Under Section 24 of the Water Industry Act 1991, special administration can be triggered by a water company’s failure to meet performance standards, including environmental pollution, and a breach of its statutory or licence duties in ways that are “serious enough to make it inappropriate for the company to continue to hold its licence”.
This appears very difficult for Reed and government lawyers to counter, given that Leonie Cooper AM, Labour’s lead at City Hall on environmental issues, earlier this month said, “With record amounts of excrement dumped into the Thames last year, the current system is not working.”
Cooper’s remarks were made with the approval of London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan.
Serious pollution incidents by Thames Water and other water companies were up 60% last year, with Thames Water responsible for 33 incidents – 44% of those registered by the Environment Agency.
Read more: You can take Steve Reed to water, but you can’t make him think
Read more: Reed slammed for ‘laughable’ claims on private water industry
Read more: Reed took £1,786 football tickets from water company owners
Read more: #TheLabourFiles: MP Reed, Evans and the Croydon connection
A D V E R T I S E M E N T
PAID ADS: To advertise your services or products to our 10,000 weekday visitors to the site, as featured on Google News Showcase, email us inside.croydon@btinternet.com for our unbeatable ad rates
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
I agree that Steve Reed is out of his depth in these matters. One suspects that the only reason he has a job in Cabinet is that he was part of a small cabal (including Keir Starmer and Morgan McSweeney) which plotted to get Starmer elected as Labour leader on a false prospectus in 2020.
Out of his depth? Other watery cliches might include, up to his neck, up the creek etc etc. Mind you, still waters run deep. Oh, maybe not
He’s been up shit creek for a while, Chris.
He is the shit in the creek
Don’t forget the paddle.
Special measures for Croydon Council good
Special measures for Thames Water bad
What a drip