Thwarted ZhongRong’s Tory peer is now backing Barwell

Might the Chinese industrialists and their Tory backers who wanted to privatise  Crystal Palace Park on the cheap now be eyeing the main chance in Croydon instead?

Tory peer Lord Bates: is he eyeing up the development chances in Croydon?

Tory peer Lord Bates: is he eyeing up the development chances in Croydon?

Inside Croydon poses the question after Lord Bates, the Tory peer who helped to launch ZhongRong’s audacious but ultimately failed Chinese takeaway of a south London park, was spotted in Croydon last week, offering his support to Gavin Barwell’s election campaign alongside hapless chief whip Michael Gove.

Conservative MP Barwell is defending a slim parliamentary majority in Croydon Central. He has frequently boasted of his “behind the scenes” role in the £1billion redevelopment of central Croydon by Westfield and Hammerson. But Barwell has tended to be more coy about his insider position on the board of the Whitgift Foundation, the major landowners and beneficiaries of the Hammersfield scheme.

Lord Bates is understood to have been behind a reception at the Houses of Parliament for the launch of the ZhongRong Group’s replica Palace project, when London’s Tory Mayor Boris Johnson tried to handover almost one-third of Crystal Palace Park to the Chinese industrialists, and later commissioning another Tory peer, Sebastian Coe, to conduct a lip-service consultation to justify the demolition of the neighbouring athletics stadium.

The “sponsor” for ZhongRong’s exclusive dealings with the Greater London Authority and Bromley Council in all this was Lady Bates, who married Michael Bates in 2012. Originally from China, Xuelin Bates is an architect and property developer who has lived in Britain for 25 years and has recently been a generous donor to the Conservative Party. The couple are minuted as attending GLA meetings as ZRG’s representatives.

Xuelin and Michael Bates. They've helped run Chinese interests in London developments since their 2012 wedding

Xuelin and Michael Bates. They’ve been behind Chinese interests in London developments since their 2012 wedding

Last weekend, Michael Bates was pounding the streets of Croydon, handing out leaflets for Barwell, who is at risk of emulating the peer’s record as a one-term MP: Bates was MP for Langbaurgh in the north-east from 1992 to 1997.

Lord and Lady Bates’s friends at ZRG, having been thwarted in their attempt to spend £500 million in one part of south London, may well be seeking other property “opportunities” nearby. And Barwell knows very well what prospects there might be in Croydon, thanks to all his self-professed “behind the scenes” work.

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
Advertisements

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in 2015 General Election, Business, Croydon Central, Gavin Barwell, Whitgift Centre, Whitgift Foundation and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Thwarted ZhongRong’s Tory peer is now backing Barwell

  1. You don’t expect a Tory peer to back Sarah Jones do you?

    • marzia27 says:

      Sadly, you missed the point and it is not the first time. I may be Labour but I do not support everything Labour. We are a catholic party.

      • I always seem to miss the point when the socialist don’t like it. You know very well that I am the only Conservative member on this forum to criticise the Conservatives when they are wrong.

        I have not missed any point and the point I am trying to make is that you don’t expect a Tory peer to back SJ.

        • It’s not about who the Tory peer is supporting, Patrick. That would be a “dog bites man” non-story.

          It’s about what their ulterior motive might be.

          So yes, you have missed the point. Again.

Leave a Reply