The Godfather (part 2): Residents’ data ‘at risk’ by off-shoring

The personal data of everyone paying Council Tax in Croydon may have been put at risk by the council’s decision to off-shore parts of its IT development programme to India, according to Town Hall whistle-blowers. STEVEN DOWNES reports

Fisher’s Folly, where a £8.4m IT project intended to save money had spent its annual budget in five months

The decision by Croydon’s assistant chief executive, Graham Cadle, to allow large parts of the council’s information technology operation to be off-shored to India in the past month could risk the security of the personal data of every resident in the borough, including the banking details of everyone who receives benefits from the council or makes payments to the council for rent, Council Tax or for parking permits.

That’s the serious concern of IT whistle-blowers who have raised their worries with Inside Croydon after previous complaints, through the council’s formal process, have been ignored.

Cadle, as the council’s assistant chief executive for “customer and transformation”, authorised a contractor, Harry Singh, to go to India earlier this month to supervise the transfer of large parts of Croydon’s digital enabling programme, which is supposed to development software for online forms that enable residents to conduct more of their council business online.

That move online is supposed to save the council millions, mainly in cutting public-facing jobs on helpdesks or in call centres.

Singh, who is paid £787 per day by Croydon Council, is an unusual appointment for the task. Colleagues accuse Singh of having a “bodge it and scarper” approach to program development.

Cadle is the godfather of Singh’s child. Its mother is Karen Sullivan, the head of revenues and benefits, whose boss is Cadle.

Between the three, they have taken decisions over confidential data of hundreds of thousands of people which colleagues within the department are most uncomfortable with. “We cannot overlook the fact that Croydon residents’ data is, right now, being worked on in India,” the concerned IT technician told Inside Croydon today.

“Normally, in other organisations I have worked with, this kind of sensitive data would be ‘scrambled’, but in this case we have opened up and given carte blanche access on the promise that the data will be kept secure.”

Council leader Tony Newman made sure he was on hand to collect the trophy from Sir Trevor McDonald when Croydon was named ‘digital council of the year’. The realities are somewhat different, as ‘The Godfather’, Graham Cadle, on main screen and far right on stage, would know

The technician claims that the decision to offshore parts of the council’s operation to India could cost the jobs of between four and six experienced tech engineers. The council believes it is saving money by taking on two full-time developers in India, at a cost of £12,000 per month.

The decision to offshore the operation came around the same time that the digital enabling programme had burned through its entire year’s budget of £8.4million in just five months. The executives who made the decision to offshore included Cadle, Singh and Sullivan.

“It might save the council a few bob, and it saves Harry’s arse short-term, but the move may put all the borough’s residents’ personal data in jeopardy,” another council source said.

“Given Harry’s track record in failing to deliver or fix the problems his small team has created, it is not a move that I can regard with any great degree of confidence.”

Matthew Wallbridge: ITC chief now asking questions

The whistle-blowers are not the only people expressing concern about data security issues and the budget overspend by Singh and the digital enabling programme.

Matthew Wallbridge is the council’s head of ICT. It was his report to the council in December 2014, supported by cabinet member Mark Watson, which recommended taking up the digital enabling programme, though there was no mention then of £8.4million annual budgets for a project which might deliver £2.75million annual savings.

Inside Croydon understands that Wallbridge has been asking some pointed questions about the digital enabling programme’s budgets and who has been making decisions about its management.

According to the council source, “Some people are beginning to wake-up to the fact that digital enabling is working like a machine built to get money out of the council without any governance.”

  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
  • 1 MILLION PAGE VIEWS IN 2017 (January to September)
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Capita, Croydon Council, Graham Cadle, Jo Negrini and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Godfather (part 2): Residents’ data ‘at risk’ by off-shoring

  1. derekthrower says:

    if this is case then any moving of personal data outside of the EU zone is breaking data protection laws and the Information Commissioner Office should be notified. I believe we are retaining these laws after brexit. So they keep telling us.

    • It is understood that this may have been avoided because the data hasn’t been moved, but it is the access to unscrambled data which has been provided to a third, or fourth, party in India.

  2. derekthrower says:

    Then if the data is being stored and utilised outside the EU & EEA safe zone this should be notified to the ICO. They are the judges of any pretext or attempts at data masking. Not some IT cowboy whose primary motivation is their cut and not the public interest. How can they not have access to data if they are not storing it?

  3. mikebweb says:

    There are too many “family” affairs in the council! How many husband and wife (girl and boy friend( teams are there?

  4. I anticipate another special Councillor training meeting in the near future. Another feature in Private Eye Rotten Boroughs? I’m actually beginning to feel sorry for staff and the many genuine hardworking Councillors being tarnished by recent news.

  5. farmersboy says:

    Maybe that’s why I got an unsolicited email from Tim Pollard, I’ve never given him my email, don’t live in Sanderstead and almost certainly don’t support whatever his email said (it was in my junk folder)

Leave a Reply