Why is the council’s house-builder going to MIPIM in Cannes?

CROYDON COMMENTARY: As VALERIE HUNTER asks: Just why is the council-owned housing developer Brick by Brick going to the world’s biggest property speculator conference in the South of France next week?

Super yachts, oligarchs and multi-billion-dollar property speculators will all be in Cannes next week, alongside Croydon’s Brick by Brick house-building company

So why are Brick by Brick going to MIPIM, the world’s largest property conference in Cannes next week, when Croydon Council, which owns the company, tells us its aim was to build homes for local families on council-owned land?

Local families need genuinely affordable – for rent as well as to buy – three-bedroom homes. But of the 29 sites listed on Inside Croydon’s article of November 21, 12 sites are for private sale only, and a mere five sites include “affordable” rent – and it appears that only a total of five of these homes have three bedrooms.

Nearly one half of the 756 homes planned are one-bedroom, and yet many thousands of one- and two-bedroom homes are planned or being built by private developers all over Croydon. Meanwhile, many existing three-bedroom homes are being converted into homes of multiple occupation – small flats – which may be good for the developers’ bottom line, but is no good for families.

Land is expensive, so on council-owned land, it might be expected that three-bedroom homes would be built, but Brick by Brick have stated, when building mostly one-bedroom homes, that this is unviable.

So is this why they’re going to Cannes – to sell off the surplus that local people cannot afford or want, resulting in more Croydon property being owned abroad, with more rent money going to overseas landlords, and the tenants having more difficulties in getting repairs done in the future?

Many of the small sites which the council’s house-builder wants to develop are garages. With the council also closing car parks so that they may be built on, the cars that used them will have to park on the streets, causing even more congestion.

The partnership between Brick by Brick and the Labour-run council seems to be as bad for Croydon Council Tax-payers as the Conservatives’ CCURV – Croydon Council Urban Regeneration Vehicle – with Laings proved to be, where constructions cost many tens of millions of pounds more than they should have done, and never with any explanation.

All of it money which could have been used to provide more affordable homes for local people.


  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
  • 1.4 MILLION PAGE VIEWS IN 2017
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS 2017: Inside Croydon was source for two award-winning nominations in Private Eye magazine’s annual celebration of civic cock-ups
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
Advertisements

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Brick by Brick, Croydon Council, Housing, Jo Negrini and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Why is the council’s house-builder going to MIPIM in Cannes?

  1. They are going because they no doubt consider themselves a “private” company even though they are based in Fishers Folly, have Council staff as Directors and are currently 100% funded by Croydon Council borrowing. They are completely unaccountable and clearly want to sell to overseas investors with the full blessing of Newman and Negrini. The people of Croydon can obviously go and f#@K themselves as far as BXB are concerned.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. timbartell says:

    Is there no probity anymore? Where is the auditor?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Dave Scott says:

    Why are they going?
    Simple – it makes them feel important.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. They are going because they can and because of the enormous networking opportunities that will come in useful if unemployment arrives in late May. Who said there were no planners on our Council?

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s