Ruskin Square and Westfield in battle to secure Home Office

Multi-billion-pound developments in central Croydon could be forced to go head-to-head in a battle to secure the Home Office as tenants for their office buildings.

On the move: Could the Home Office help to salvage Westfield Croydon’s project?

According to a report published this morning by Property Week magazine, the Home Office is considering pitching for a new 350,000sqft head office to be delivered by Westfield and Hammerson as part of their long-delayed redevelopment of the Whitgift Centre.

If such a deal was agreed, it might salvage the £1.4billion Westfield project from the brink of collapse.

However, were the government’s property specialists to cut a deal with Westfield and Hammerson for the Whitgift site, it would be a massive blow for Ruskin Square, next to East Croydon Station.

Ruskin Square has been painstakingly and painfully assembled over the past decade or more by Stanhope and Schroders, and they had hoped that their second office block would be pre-leased to the Home Office.

The first Ruskin Square office block is already home to another large government department, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs. But plans for further office builds as part of the £500million Ruskin Square mixed residential and commercial development have had tobe shelved, according to Schroders because of the lengthy uncertainty surrounding the Westfield and Hammerson redevelopment of the town centre.

One Ruskin Square at East Croydon, home of the HMRC. Will the Home Office move in as neighbours?

The Home Office’s immigration and visa service already occupies two 1960s-built office blocks on Wellesley Road: Lunar House and Apollo House.

According to Property Week, the Home Office’s lease on those buildings expires in 2024; there seems little chance that any “Hammersfield” scheme in the town centre will be completed before that date, given the delays to that development so far.

A Home Office transfer to another Croydon site would not represent any real, “new” investment  in the town centre, just an overdue upgrade for the tenants.

And were the developers, Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield together with Hammerson, to accommodate the Home Office’s requirements, according to Property Week, they “would have to go back to the drawing board and rework their plans”.

That would therefore be the third version of plans put forward for the scheme since Hammerson and Westfield first agreed on the Croydon development in 2012.

Currently, the scheme – which has had planning permission granted and Compulsory Purchase Orders approved – is for 500,000sqft of a retail supermall and nearly 1,000 “luxury apartments”.

Although the original Whitgift Centre, when it was built in the 1960s, included office blocks, there was no significant commercial office component considered for the Westfield-Hammerson redevelopment.

Westfield and Hammerson have both recently announced that their scheme was “under review” because of the dramatic changes in the retail sector, and demolition work due to commence in 2019 has been postponed, indefinitely, casting considerable doubt about whether the scheme will go ahead at all.


About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in "Hammersfield", Business, Centrale, CPO, Planning, Property, Ruskin Square, Whitgift Centre and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Ruskin Square and Westfield in battle to secure Home Office

  1. Er, have I got this right?

    Is the French-owned Unibail-Rodanco-Westfield, which even seven years ago had net income of over €1,300,000,000, asking the UK government to bail out the undersold Westfield and abandon the specifically developed Ruskin Square in its favour? That sounds like a Uniballsup.

    The answer should be a big fat “Non!” with an instruction for them to get a move on with building to relocate all the blighted shops and the businesses in The Whitgift ASAP, so that we can help to protect the jobs of all the workers in retail here. Lord knows we have few enough jobs that aren’t zero hours and even fewer in manufacturing.

    Plus the building boom won’t last forever, unless it is refocused on social housing.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. derekthrower says:

    There appears to be a lot of kite flying going on in this article, and we know who normally has his hands on the biggest uncontrollable kites in the Cabinet Office. It seems utterly ridiculous to make a retail redevelopment scheme become dependent on the relocation of Civil Servants, but we know we have entered into an alternate reality since Barwell was placed at the commanding heights of Government with his hands on the levers of public expenditure. Don’t know where this story emerged from, but it wreaks of pure desperation.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Lewis White says:

    I would have thought that the logical place for the government offices is to go is near the station, on the intended Ruskin Square site.

    And the new residential flats to be on the Whitgift site, so the new residents can flood out on Saturday mornings and spend money in the Westfield shops.

    As an aside, it seems amazing that the Government never bought the freehold of the iconic Lunar and Apollo Houses.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.