Scott forced to U-turn over developer’s Barham Road scheme

Paul Scott, the puppet-master on the council’s planning committee, was forced to make an embarrassing U-turn last night over a developer’s application to turn a Victorian family home in South Croydon into five small flats.

The developers’ friend: Paul Scott

As Inside Croydon reported yesterday, the private developer’s original planning application for 11 Barham Road had already been dismissed by the whole committee – with the exception of Labour councillor Scott, who voted in favour of it. That application is now subject to an appeal to the independent planning inspector.

The inspector is due to visit the site in the next few days, with a ruling expected by August, and the majority of the committee members appeared to agree with Waddon councillor Robert Canning, who spoke on behalf of the neighbourhood’s residents that this updated application ought to be deferred until the inspector’s ruling had been received.

Council sources suggest that the application only appeared on last night’s committee agenda at the firm insistence of Scott who, until recently had been the controversial chair of planning.

On the night, the Barham Road matter was indeed deferred – by four hours, as those who turned up promptly to attend the committee which began at 6.30pm were forced to wait until long after 10pm for the matter to be discussed. For some reason never disclosed by Toni Letts, the veteran councillor who chairs the committee, or by council officials, the item was pushed down their agenda.

It was well worth waiting for, though.

Accusations from a Conservative (oh, the irony) councillor on the committee, Jason Perry, that the council’s professional planning staff “bend over backwards for developers” drew approval from those residents who had remained in the public gallery, and an order from Letts to withdraw the remark. Perry refused.

11 Barham Road (to the right of the picture), which greedy developers want to turn into five flats

Following a discussion of the scheme, which council officials had recommended to be granted planning permission, there was a strong sense that the committee was about to vote to refuse.

In the face of such opposition, it was Scott who then stepped in to move for deferral of the decision.

It had already been a bad night for Scott and his developer chums who want to “concrete over Croydon”. Another scheme, to squeeze nine flats into some land off Croham Valley Road in South Croydon ward, was also sent away with a flea in its ear.

Of the Barham Road scheme, one Katharine Street observer said, “It’s another example where Scott has gone out on a limb for a private developer.

“He’s basically just wasted dozens of people’s time. This item would never have been on the agenda if it wasn’t for him. The conflicts of interest he has, as an architect in the business and with his wife, Alison Butler as the cabinet member for housing, ought to mean he shouldn’t be anywhere within a million miles of influencing decisions on planning.

“Thank goodness there are some on the planning committee who are beginning to show some backbone.”

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Paul Scott, Planning, Robert Canning, South Croydon, Toni Letts, Waddon and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Scott forced to U-turn over developer’s Barham Road scheme

  1. I would have loved to have seen the look on his face when he was out voted.

  2. sebastiantillinger7694 says:

    Paul Scott’s ‘Neediness’ is now quite bizarre. He craves the planning committee’s admiration and recognition but also is constantly questioning the committee and punishing them through chastisement and the public display of his ‘superior’ knowledge gleaned from his day job.

    The problem for Croydon is that Scott’s plays these emotions out on a planning committee and it impacts people’s real lives. It impacts the views they get from their gardens, their ability to be able to turn into their driveway and their desire not to have car headlights shining into their bedrooms.

    It’s important folk realise it’s not just about planning with Scott.

  3. spope551 says:

    Sounds like a rather Machiavellian character!

Leave a Reply