Under-pressure utility giant Thames Water wants to be able to continue to dump sewage into the River Wandle, a rare chalk stream, until 2035.

Murky business: this is the River Wandle during a previous incident when Thames Water allowed the rare chalk stream to be heavily polluted
That shocking admission emerged at the last meeting for Sutton Council’s scrutiny committee this year.
The River Wandle rises in South Croydon, flowing north-west, mostly underground through Waddon, emerging above ground at Waddon Ponds and Wandle Park, before continuing its course to Carshalton, through Merton and on to the Thames.
Chalk streams are exceedingly rare, with only around 200 in the whole world.
Of these, 85% are found in southern England, and there are just two of those flowing through London. The River Wandle is one of those.
Chalk streams are supposed to have very clear water that’s rich in minerals and attracts a wide variety of aquatic plants and fish. Brown trout, chub, barbel and roach have been found in the Wandle.
After two centuries of industrialisation through south London, using the Wandle’s waters to power tobacco mills and for other processes, much progress had been made in the latter part of the 20th Century to restore the Wandle to a more natural state.

Concerned celebrity: Feargal Sharkey has walked the length of the Wandle and remains angry about Thames Water’s neglect
But in the past decade, there have been regular complaints about untreated sewage being released into the Wandle by Thames Water. As recently as last May, after being implicated in the latest shabby sewage spill, Thames Water vowed to “put things right”.
The plight of the Wandle has attracted the ire of Feargal Sharkey, the anti-pollution and environmental campaigner, the former lead singer of The Undertones, who has been an occasional guest on TV programmes such as Mortimer and Whitehouse: Gone Fishing to talk about the damage being done by profit-driven water companies.
And now Thames Water is claiming that they can’t afford to undertake vital infrastructure upgrades to protect the Wandle for another 12 years, in a serious threat to the river’s biodiversity.
At the Sutton Council meeting, Thames Water claimed it is currently carrying out an ecological assessment to determine the priorities for new works expected to be carried out around Beddington, where they had promised to invest £611million over a 25-year period.
They admitted that, beyond work on the Thames Tideway tunnel, no work has been carried out on the Wandle in the last five years, while their sewage discharges have continued.
According to the South East Rivers Trust, there were 13 separate incidents between December 2022 and this month, leading to over 25 hours of discharge. An incident on December 8 this year was investigated over heightened levels of ammonium, which may have occurred because of a fly-tip in the river.
“Sewage dumping and other pollutants are putting it under threat once again,” said Sutton councillor Bobby Dean, a member of the committee.
“The Government must get its act together and hold the water companies to account for their failure to protect our local river.”
Thames Water, meanwhile, have somewhat complacently relied on an Environment Agency rating of the River Wandle to decide that their Beddington sewage treatment works is not among their top 250 plants that will receive a more urgent upgrade.
Thames Water also sought to shift the blame on to local residents.
“We’re aware of the problems caused by misconnections on the Wandle, which are mostly wrongly connected pipes on private properties,” a spokesperson said.
“We have a programme of work to help rectify this, and last year we partnered with the South East Rivers Trust and local volunteers to identify misconnections in the area. Since 2020 we have identified 105 misconnections.
“We regard all discharges as unacceptable, and we have published plans to upgrade over 250 of our sewage treatment works and sewers.”
Read more: River from Tory Philp’s constituency runs brown with sewage
Read more: Rivers and environment are at peril from nation’s lawmakers
- Inside Croydon – as seen on TV! – has been delivering local community news since 2010. 3million page views per year in 2020, 2021 and 2022.
- If you want real journalism, actually based in the borough, you should consider paying for it. Please sign up today. Click here for more details
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SIXTH successive year in 2022 in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
This not right… these leaches have been paying bonuses & Shareholder fees for years – despite their duty was to clean up their systems when de-nationalised.
Thames Water are a private company that only exists to make money for their shareholders and pay unreasonable salaries to their senior staff. Why are we letting them destroy our natural heritage?
Privatisation has failed because greed is always going to prioritise making money instead of providing the service we need. Sadly the Conservatives, Labour, and the LibDems still stupidly believe that greed is good. The Green Party is clear that we need to bring public services back into public hands and ensure they work for people and planet, not profit and pollution.
My browser won’t allow me to like comments on this page! I agree with George and Peter
Yes, sorry about the thumbs up/thumbs down utility. It’s been doing odd things… Just hope WordPress haven’t suffered a hack alongside RingGo!
A good while ago I chaired an investigation into water in London at the London Assembly. I went down the Beckton sewer twice where the Victorian investment in sewer was impressive, almost cathedral like. But in heavy rains the foul sewer discharges over the shared foul/water sewers’ boundary wall there into the water sewer out into the Thames. Privitisation has not delivered the required infrastructure investment.
But let’s not get tricked by the water utilities who ran off with so much borrowed cash into bailing them out through nationalisation. These utilities gouged money out of us with a high debt model to pay out that cash raised to give to shareholders and senior management instead of investing in infrastructure. Nationalisation should only take place if the utilities fail and are brought out for close to £zero.
With £95 Billion needed to be spent on water utility infrastructure between 2025 and 2030, according to OFWAT, it would be better to force the private companies to invest that money rather than have each and every typical family in Britain have to pay £6,000 more in tax to buyout the water companies and fund infrastructure in a country where taxes are already at a post war high.
The better regulated US utility model with low fixed returns through public interest companies is a better model than nationalisation.
Tax water companies’ price rises, profits, dividends and bonuses at the rate of 100% until they meet stringent legal standards on rivers, lakes and sea pollution, cut their supply leakages to the levels achieved in the Netherlands, Japan and Germany and end their abstraction that leaves former streams dry.
And clear out the complicit feeble non-enforcers at Ofwat and make Feargal Sharkey the new CEO
Pity the environment agency can’t compel Thames water to stop doing this or fine them. Alot. Disgraceful.
there is no excuse in 2023 for a company to discharge sewage into a chalk stream. Can the Environment Agency not compel Thames Water?