Addington Hills in bloom: this is a tract of land that The Addington Golf Club wants to take over, claiming it is ‘unmanaged’ – which is not actually true
CROYDON COMMENTARY: Our exclusive news report yesterday of a bid by one of the country’s best-known golf clubs to take over public land from the council has been greeted with widespread disgust.
Here, PETER UNDERWOOD, local conservationist and Green Party election candidate, pictured left, outlines his objections to the proposal, and launches a public petition
The plans for The Addington Golf Club to take control over and fence off our public spaces just so they can build a driving range on Shirley Heath for their private members’ club must be stopped.
One of the wonderful things about living in Croydon is being able to visit our amazing parks, woodlands and green spaces. We use them to go for a walk, run or cycle. We walk the dog and take the children to a place where they can run around. And we use them as a place to connect with nature and get away from the noise and concrete in other parts of Croydon.
One of the bad things about Croydon is that we are constantly having to fight off threats ruin those green spaces.
Addington Golf Club has announced plans to build a driving range, an irrigation pond and other buildings on Shirley Heath and threatened to build sports pitches and other unspecified “facilities” all over the rest of the heath and Addington Hills.
It is quite clear that the golf club just want to grab public land to build the driving range for the members of their private club. Their own document says that the driving range “could” be open to the public. Access to their golf course at present will cost you £165 a time at the weekend, and you have to be wearing the right clothes and you have to play golf.
I am known as a defender of our green spaces, and so it’s probably no surprise that I am completely against this latest land grab.
As Matthew Frith, from the London Wildlife Trust, said in yesterday’s article, the proposals as published by The Addington are “a typical pretext that we see in many development proposals that seek to damage or remove areas of nature conservation importance”.
The first day I ever volunteered with The Conservation Volunteers was working at the top of Addington Hills to look after the lowland heath habitat. I met a great bunch of people, we spent all day debating over whether it should be called Addington Hills or Shirley Hills, and we had a great time working to look after the site. It got me hooked on conservation work and I have returned many times to Addington Hills and Shirley Heath to look after both sites.
Insulted: the conservation work of hundreds of volunteers, here on Shirley Heath, over many years, has been dismissed by the golf club owners
So when the Addington Golf Club refers to both sites as just “unmanaged woodland”, it really is an insult to the hard work of literally hundreds of volunteers who have devoted their time and energies on those sites over many years. It also shows that the golf club don’t really understand, or care, about how these sites have been managed up to now.
That is another reason for not trusting them to manage them in the future.
On a wider level, both Shirley Heath and Addington Hills are registered as Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation. Both are graded at Metropolitan importance – the highest level for sites in London.
Both of these sites contain fragments of lowland heath. This is an increasingly rare habitat and the London Wildlife Trust estimates that around 85% of heathland has been lost over the past 150 years. You only have to think of another big heathland site in Croydon, Thornton Heath, and other similar places across London to see why we don’t have much heath left – it was all taken over and built on. Just what The Addington Golf Club is threatening to do now.
Addington Hills has been a public site for more than 100 years and Shirley Heath for nearly as long. As with all our parks and green spaces, they could do with more support from the council to look after them. But giving them over to a private club and building on them is the opposite of what we should be doing with these sites.
Ray Mears, the bushcraft expert and television presenter who grew up in Croydon has said, “Green space is very good for our psychological health. It makes us sharper, it reduces anxiety, it makes us feel good…. that’s what greenery does for us. It does improve our lives.”
If you want to save Shirley Heath and Addington (or Shirley) Hills from being built on and keep our green spaces open to the public for free, then please sign the petition and write to your councillors and other local politicians to demand that they stop the Addington Golf Club’s dreadful plans from becoming a reality.
- Peter Underwood is the Green Party’s candidate for Croydon and Sutton in the London Assembly elections being held on May 2
Read more: Suspicions raised over golf club’s Addington Hills ‘land grab’
Croydon Commentary provides a platform for any of our readers to offer their personal views about what matters to them in and around the borough. To submit an article for publication, just email us at inside.croydon@btinternet.com, or post your comment to an Inside Croydon article that has caught your attention
- If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
As featured on Google News Showcase
- Our comments section on every report provides all readers with an immediate “right of reply” on all our content. Our comments policy can be read by clicking here
Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
- Inside Croydon works together with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, as well as BBC London News and ITV London
ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine
Hardly “widespread disgust”, there is plenty of support to actually make the most of this rotting, unmanaged and degrading land….all while creating world class facilities to do the borough justice
More than 1,000 signatures from the general public in a petition in less than 24 hours, people who are disgusted that a wealthy private landowner wants to stage a land grab of public property.
Your characterisation of Shirley Heath as “rotting”, “unmanaged” and “degrading” is very far wide of the mark. It is, in fact, an outright lie.
“World-class facilities”? If you need to use a driving range, get in your Lotus sports car and pootle round to Addiscombe Court. They have a driving range for their members and players (it’s pay-to-play there, no need for a £2,000 membership fee up-front), or any one of the three or four other courses nearby (including one other public course) which do actually provide their users with adequate practice facilities.
That The Addington charges its members so much and provides them with sub-standard facilities is obviously a problem for their wealthy owners, but not one that the wider public has to resolve by giving up some of its precious open space.
UPDATE: 2,600…
UPDATE 2: 3,200…
UPDATE: 4,000
UPDATE: 5,431
absolute nonsense.
Do you have a vested interest to support this disgusting land grab and what do you base your ignorant and unsubstantiated statement on?
AWFUL IDEA – there are plenty of places to golf in the area. The local golfing community would benefit from reconsidering before they exhaust the good will of the people of Croydon. I honestly cannot believe this has been suggested.
How dis the Council come into possession of this land. Are there any covenants imposed the the acquisition. Was it for the benefit of the people of the Borough. Should it be kept as open space?
Wasn’t the land compulsory purchased from The Addington after the war to build houses on? What used to be the New Course?
It’s just greed so they make more money at the expence of taking away the land used by the public for there own enjoyment ……
Sadly I doubt if there is anyone left in the Planning Dept aware of SSI sites.. doubt if they consulted the Green Spaces Dept..although there is no specialist knowledge left in this dept… one only has to look at Coombe Gardens… so sad
“Degrading”?! What a strangely peculiar use of the word. Out of interest how has the area ever degraded you?
It is obviously managed. If it weren’t it would be covered in wild brambles like the railway embankments south of East Croydon. You can hardly see the daffodils now! Such a pity.