Majority of councillors sign letter of support for Nightwatch

Under threat: Croydon Nightwatch and its volunteers have been providing hot food, help and hope to the homeless and working poor from Queen’s Gardens for almost half a century

CROYDON IN CRISIS: Open letter to Mayor Perry describes the ‘shocking way’ the council has treated one of the borough’s most-respected charities.
By STEVEN DOWNES

Under pressure: Croydon’s £82,000 per year elected Mayor, Jason Perry

More than half of the borough’s elected councillors have signed an open letter to Mayor Jason Perry calling for his urgent, personal assurances that Town Hall officials will abandon any threat of legal action against Croydon Nightwatch, the charity which has been providing hot meals, help and hope for almost 50 years.

Inside Croydon reported last week how a council bureaucrat, Huw Rhys Lewis BSc, BArch, MSc, MRIBA, MRICS, MAPM, the council’s “interim director of commercial investment and capital”, had issued the written threat to Nightwatch, ordering them to relocate their nightly service for the town centre’s homeless, rough sleepers and working poor, which has operated in and around Queen’s Gardens since the 1970s.

At a Town Hall meeting last week, when asked about the threat of a court injunction to stop Nightwatch feeding the homeless, Tory Mayor Perry provided no undertaking that the council would drop its callous threat against the volunteer-led charity, nor that he would not – again – waste public money on a futile legal case.

The councillors’ letter to Perry, released this morning, was circulated over the weekend. All 34 Labour councillors and the borough’s two Green and one Liberal Democrat have signed the letter. No Conservative councillors added their signature to the letter.

The letter to Mayor Perry states:

We call on you to support Nightwatch, a charity that has been serving some of Croydon’s most vulnerable people for almost 50 years, most visibly at Queen’s Gardens.

Nightwatch has been asking for a dialogue with the council about a permanent shelter with lighting for the charity to operate from, which they would fund themselves. Despite their service, we are concerned about the council’s interactions with this charity, which they say have included repeated failures to reply, confusion and legal threats.

This is a shocking way to treat one of Croydon’s most highly regarded charities, which has also been adopted as the official charity of the civic mayor.

We would therefore like you to answer the following questions:

  • Can Nightwatch continue to serve the homeless at Queen’s Gardens?
  • Can you confirm that the council will not be using public money to take this charity for homeless people to court?
  • Can you make sure the council has respectful and timely communications with this charity, including from planning officers about a potential new shelter?
  • Can you confirm your personal support for Nightwatch?

We note that during the redevelopment of the park and Taberner House, both landscapers and developers assured Nightwatch that their volunteers could continue to help feed and support their clients at Queen’s Gardens, as they have done every night for years.

We know that Croydon has seen a frightening increase in homelessness, and people from all parties and none are conscious of the huge human cost that brings to people as well as the financial cost to the council.

Given the council’s financial challenges, we know we are increasingly reliant on Croydon’s community and voluntary sector. We must support those voluntary groups who are doing everything to safeguard the health of our most vulnerable population whilst also helping them to get into employment and stable housing.

Please reflect Croydon’s commitment to this treasured local charity and their clients by answering these questions and giving Nightwatch the support it deserves.

Last night, Nightwatch’s team of volunteers were out in the cold and wet at Queen’s Gardens once again, where more than 100 people came seeking a hot meal and some help.

Nightwatch, with more than one hundred volunteers, is among the borough’s largest and most active charity groups. In 2022, Croydon Nightwatch volunteers received the Queen’s Award for Voluntary Service “for their tireless work for the homeless and otherwise vulnerable people in Croydon”.

Nightwatch and their nightly service have been shunted from pillar to post over the last decade, sometimes allowed to set up their tables under the cover of the steps area in front of the council offices, Fisher’s Folly, and sometimes persuaded back into the much-reduced public park.

Nightwatch maintain that through all this, they have acted properly, responsibly and, above all, legally, setting up only on the public highway and in public open spaces.

Jad Adams, Nightwatch’s chair, had approached council officials to try to progress long-running discussions about the possibility of providing some kind of shelter from the elements for the charity’s volunteers during their nightly shifts in all weathers in Queen’s Gardens.

What he got back as a “somewhat intemperate” threat of legal action.

Adams says that the bureaucrat’s email to the charity was “inaccurate in almost every single particular”.

Any legal action taken against the charity, Adams said, “Would be a considerable waste of public money, it would be fiercely contested by us and would generate a deal of bad publicity.”

Read more: Perry’s council threatens legal action against homeless charity
Read more: No money, no plan, no honesty: Mayor still closing 4 libraries
Read more: ‘The council is dismantling our borough, service by service’


Inside Croydon – If you want real journalism, delivering real news, from a publication that is actually based in the borough, please consider paying for it. Sign up today: click here for more details


  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, or want to publicise your residents’ association or business, or if you have a local event to promote, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com
  • As featured on Google News Showcase
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS: In January 2024, Croydon was named among the country’s rottenest boroughs for a SEVENTH successive year in the annual round-up of civic cock-ups in Private Eye magazine

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in "Hammersfield", Business, Charity, Croydon Council, Croydon Nightwatch, Croydon parks, Housing, Jad Adams, Mayor Jason Perry, Queens Gardens, Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Majority of councillors sign letter of support for Nightwatch

  1. Diana Pinnell says:

    Now that Queens Gardens is no longer a public garden, but a children’s playground, presumably intended for children living in the new apartments, perhaps the residents do not want it to be a public space any longer? If this is the case, of course the Council should provide an alternative venue, preferably purpose-built and sheltered, for Nightwatch to use. Perhaps a currently empty shop, there are enough of them in Croydon. Common sense instead of threats, please, Croydon Council.

    • Mathew Hill says:

      The park and playground is open to the general public. It is not restricted simply to residents of Queens Gardens. I don’t live in Queens Gardens, but I take my young nephew to the playground whenever we visit Croydon. My apologies if we’ve been trespassing all this time.

      Also, Nightwatch only uses the platformed space at the side of Queens Gardens, which is ringed off, via an iron gate, from the main park, and is furthest distance from the apartment blocks. We only use that space between roughly 9:20pm and 10:30pm (it’s possible, on rare occasions, that we may operate a little longer for late-comers or emergencies, in view of the understandably chaotic and difficult lives of our clients, but, predominantly, we start and end at the aforementioned times).

      I don’t know what the ultimate solution to this issue is (it’s likely above my ‘pay-grade’). As a regular volunteer for Nightwatch, I’d hate to say anything that accidentally contradicts the charity’s excellent Chair, Jad Adams, but I don’t believe I’m mistaken as to these facts regarding the accessibility of Queens Gardens or Nightwatch’s operating times.

  2. James Seabrook says:

    Well done to the relevant councillors for the open letter. I hope it has a positive effect.

    Most people aren’t homeless by choice. They’re generally very pleasant people who are very grateful for Nightwatch.

    Shame on the conservative councillors, that apparently not even one signed it. Perhaps they know they should have but can’t bring themselves to upset their dear mayor for fear of petty retribution. I can’t get my head round how people in supposedly responsible positions can be so cruel by inaction.

    • Mathew Hill says:

      Indeed, shame on the Conservatives, and credit to the Labour, Green and Lib Dem councillors for their stance and actions, so far, thus throwing into sharp relief the clear distinction between the latter socially-progressive parties and the Nasty Party. Whatever else is going on in the country right now (for which I’d prefer to offer no comment at this time), as a Labour Party member, it pleases me to be reminded that, alongside the Greens and Lib Dems, my local party colleagues are on the side of our town’s most vulnerable residents, and that come 2026, it’s essential that our Labour candidate wins the mayoralty from Jason Perry.

  3. Mayor Perry couldn’t give a (Castlemaine) XXXX what these councillors think. He’s effectively accountable to nobody until Thursday 7 May 2026.

    He knows he’s got no chance of being re-elected. so whether it’s setting his attack lawyer on a homeless charity, closing libraries or taking full-time money for a very part-time job while ingratiating himself with the Tory top brass, he’ll do what he wants for the next 19 months.

    And all the while giving himself maximum self-publicity at our expense

  4. Peter Underwood says:

    Local Conservatives are continuing their cruel attacks on the poorest people in our community

    Instead of supporting Nightwatch – who are providing a vital service for people who’ve been abandoned by the Council – Conservatives are just supporting their mayor in threatening legal action against the charity

    Conservatives keep saying that they want to get rid of their reputation as the nasty party, but time and time again they keep being nasty

  5. Derek Thrower says:

    This Council doesn’t seem to mind setting new records in malevolence to the most vulnerable. Surprised Perry isn’t wearing a Bumble the Beadle outfit at the Council Offices and shouting out “What, more?” as Nightwatch provide provisions.

  6. Ken Towl says:

    Nightwatch have helped thousands of the most vulnerable people over the years, making a real difference, providing a service at no cost to the council tax payer, a gift to a council that is somewhat less capable of providing good value services. The logical action would be to support them. This is both cruel and stupid. And every single Conservative councillor knows this.

Join the conversation here