Landlords challenge licensing scheme with Judicial Review

Another of Labour’s flagship policies for Croydon, the landlord licensing scheme which was a key part of the manifesto when they won control of the council last year, could be facing a crisis as a group of local businesses are to challenge the decision in the High Court.

Flats-to-let-007The Judicial Review against the council scheme has some commercial money behind it, coming from a group calling itself the Croydon Property Forum.

The landlords are challenging the manner in which the council conducted its consultation – which Croydon was forced to extend by 10 weeks after an earlier concern that the law had not been complied with properly.

Earlier this year, Alison Butler, the council’s deputy leader, and Jo Negrini, the executive director in charge of planning, had assured a meeting of the scrutiny committee that they had taken all necessary steps so that the council would avoid being dragged through the courts over this scheme, which was due to be implemented from October 1, with landlords expected to pay £750 for a five-year licence, discounted to a “bargain” £350 for those who registered early.

Croydon Labour has suggested that the licence fees are necessary to pay towards the administration of the scheme.

Today, Butler was forced to issue a terse statement which reads: “We are confident that our landlord licensing scheme is robust, lawful and will raise housing standards across the borough, and we’ll continue preparing to launch this scheme from October 1.”

Controversially, Butler and the Labour-run council had pushed through the measure in mid-March, just a fortnight before the Conservative-led Government passed measures intended to prevent new licence schemes from being introduced.

The measure – what the Tories like to call “the Tenant Tax” – has been opposed by the council’s Conservative opposition group, which includes among its councillors several … private landlords.

Alison Butler: robust and lawful

The 2004 Housing Act provided for the licensing of private landlords by local authorities, a measure intended to address the impact of poor quality private landlords and reduce levels of anti-social behaviour. Landlords who fail to get licensed face fines of up to £20,000, while breaches of a licence can incur penalties of up to £5,000.

Landlords resent the regulation, since they regard it as an additional expense (which will doubtless be passed on to their tenants in increased rents), and because it lumps the “good” landlords together with the bad and irresponsible ones. The licensing scheme has “been looming around like a vegetarian’s fart”, according to one blogging landlord.

“As with most of these hare-brained schemes introduced to benefit the ‘greater good’ it comes attached with a financial cost that landlords are forced to grin and bear. In other words, the ‘bend over, this won’t hurt a bit’ treatment is in full effect,” the anonymous blogger said, colourfully.

  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or local event, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Alison Butler, Business, Croydon Council, Housing, Jo Negrini, Planning, Property and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Landlords challenge licensing scheme with Judicial Review

  1. staywellfireyourdoctor says:

    Honestly as a tenant I have no interest in a landlord scheme which will raise my rent! 😡

    Like

  2. davidjl2014 says:

    This is indeed an excellent article. Quite right…Landlords will obviously pass on any additional overheads enforced by local authorities directly to tenants, thus increasing already high rents. Quite right….the 2004 Housing Act more than covers problems that unconcerned/rogue Landlords blatantly ignore. It fails however to research into what Ms Butler’s qualifications are to become an expert on how to manage a property. Is she an Accredited Landlord? Does she own property and rent it out? Or does she belong to the one of the “buffoon councillor committees”? These “committees” include many village idiots with very little knowledge yet have a political aspiration to enhance their progress in politics. The Croydon Council has been full of such people for years. That’s why only 32% of the people in Croydon bother to turn out to vote for them in the local elections. This fool Butler just doesn’t understand that this legislation will not stop rogue landlords (who wont register anyway) neither will it stop properties being neglected, anti social behaviour or over crowding. She just has to be prime candidate for Chair of the “Inner-Cabinet Buffoon Committee”. What an achievement for being paid more than that a nurse gets in Croydon’s University Hospital.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.