Developers in multi-million-pound gamble over playing fields

Croydon College has sold off disused playing fields near the Purley Way to a private firm of housing developers, while the land does not have planning permission for housing.

The vacant playing fields next to Duppas Hill Park. New owners could make millions out of developing the site for housing

None of the parties to the secretive deal are willing to divulge the financial terms of the land sale.

But it seems possible that a valuable public asset – playing fields – have been transferred to private interests at a rock-bottom price as part of a multi-million-pound gamble by the developers.

With space on the site for more than 120 homes, the property speculators at London Strategic Land, the new owners, if they are allowed to build on the fields, could end up selling houses worth an estimated total of £40million. Yet they may have acquired the site for less than £1million.

The Heath Clark playing fields, next to Duppas Hill Park, have been vacant since the school they used to serve was closed and bulldozed to make way for housing almost 20 years ago. Then, more than 150 homes were built on what is now called Old School Place.

The school playing fields were passed to Croydon College, but have been largely left unused. No attempt has been made to link the playing fields with the neighbouring park. More recently, the fenced-off playing fields have served as casual grazing for some travellers’ ponies, or as a speedway track for boy racers.

Land prices vary, of course. Elsewhere in Croydon, plots of land without planning permission have been selling for £4,000 per acre.

Yet the asking price for one acre of land with planning permission for housing could be as much as £1million.

The Heath Clark site is estimated to amount to around 10 acres.

Frances Wadsworth: fast-tracked playing fields sale

Until this year, the Heath Clark playing fields had protected status as local open land, effectively barring any kind of development.

But the current Labour-run council, in preparing the Croydon Local Plan, decided to remove this protection.

In a written answer to council questions last October, Alison Butler, the deputy leader, said that the site could instead be used to build a secondary school and between 62 and 128 new homes.

The reason Butler gave for Heath Clark losing its protected open land status was that it “did not meet the criteria as it is not publically [sic] accessible” – something which has never occurred to the ponies, and their owners, who seem to access the site as they please. Certainly, neither Croydon Council nor the college ever sought to find ways of making the playing fields more readily accessible to local people, as they might have done.

At the recent planning inspector’s hearings on the Croydon Local Plan, consultants working for Croydon College filed lengthy objections to the site’s designation for a school build.

Also observed as attending the inspector’s session which discussed the Heath Clark site was a representative of London Strategic Land, a recently established investment fund management firm, based in the West End and chaired by Mark Tagliaferri.

That inspector’s hearing was on May 31.

At the hearing, the inspector was clearly unimpressed with the council’s submission, which maintained that the site must be used for a new school. The inspector sent the council and the college away and told them to agree something called a Statement of Common Ground and Areas of Dispute.

This was duly done, and a document was signed by the council and the land owners, Croydon College, on June 29.

In the agreement, it states, “Both parties agree that the current level of projected growth in Secondary School places up to 2031 could be met by the identified supply of secondary school places without the need for Heath Clark, provided site 662 (Coombe Road Playing Fields, Coombe Road) and Site 116 (Rees House & Morland Lodge, Morland Road) are delivered in the first 10 years of the Local Plan and population growth is as projected.”

The Statement of Common Ground agreement between the council and Croydon College is not planning permission, and it does not guarantee that the land can be used for housing. But the document appears to have been used by the college to fast-track the land sale to London Strategic Land.

Mark Tagliaferri: chairman of London Strategic, which could make millions out of the development of playing fields

London Strategic are now left to wait for the inspector’s ruling, like a gambler watching the wheels turning on a one-armed bandit. If the inspector rules that Heath Clark should be re-designated as a site for housing, they will have hit the jackpot.

But the company has already had at least one meeting with Croydon Council and been told that they still want the site for a school.

According to Simon Hall, the cabinet member for finance, “The Council has reaffirmed that it continues to consider that this site should be used mainly for educational purposes, with any housing being subsidiary to that.

“It has made representations to that effect in the examination in public with the inspector and explained this to London Strategic Land.

“Obviously, we will all have to see what the Inspector determines, as with all areas where there is dispute.”

London Strategic Land and Croydon College both confirmed today that the land sale had gone through, subject to the usual contractual niceties involved with any six-figure-plus transaction.

Frances Wadsworth, the principal of Croydon College, was not available to answer questions directly about the vast differential in the land’s value if sold without planning permission.

But in a statement to Inside Croydon she said, “It’s land we’ve had for some time but has not been of any particular use to our students.

“Of course, the funds will come in very useful when invested in education, which is a good thing.

“The land is being put to better use.”

London Strategic refused to answer any questions on the circumstances of their Waddon land grab.

Many similar land sales include something called an “overage provision”, so that if planning permission is obtained for the development of the property within 30 years, an additional percentage of the uplift in the value of the property will be due to the seller. That might – might – yield an additional £3million to Croydon College in due course.

But public-owned playing fields will still be lost forever.

The governors at Croydon College include academics and teachers, as well as Martin Corney, the chief executive of the Whitgift Foundation, the biggest landowners in the borough, while the chair of the college’s audit committee is Craig O’Donnell, who works in a senior role at another property developer, Land Securities.

Croydon College, close to East Croydon, is undergoing significant redevelopment work as part of the £30million refurbishment of the Fairfield Halls, with some of its property being utilised to build town centre flats by the council-owned house-builders, Brick by Brick.

With government cuts to budgets hitting all education establishments, Croydon College may well have felt squeezed into doing a quick deal. Only when the full figures of the Heath Clark sale are finally made available – if they ever are – will we know whether they have managed to obtain best value out of a public asset being handed over for potentially massive private profit.


  • Inside Croydon is Croydon’s only independent news source, still based in the heart of the borough. In April-May 2017, we averaged 32,000 page views every week
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at inside.croydon@btinternet.com

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email inside.croydon@btinternet.com
This entry was posted in Croydon College, Croydon Council, Croydon South, Housing, Planning, Schools, Simon Hall, Waddon and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Developers in multi-million-pound gamble over playing fields

  1. croydonres says:

    A chunk of publicly owned land being sold for a song to a canny developer?.
    (In South Wales Valleys accent, sung by a National Treasure) What’s new, Pussycat?

    A good example of public sector bungling, giving away a big potential profit to the private sector?
    (in Bristol accent) Not another one!

    (In S London-Surrey accent)
    I support redevelopment of this land, either for housing and a school– as it has lain unused since well before the Millennium. It is of nil use for wildlife, and has a socking great trench round it, so can’t be used by the public. It has been in limbo for years.

    Why oh why was the Purley Way new primary school not built here, so that the children could breathe fresh air !

    And why was the land vested in Croydon College?. It should have been taken in hand by the Government years back.

    Silly me, I thought the council owned the land, and might–just might– use it creatively to build new homes or a decent new school for local needs, but adding a good proportion of land into the Duppas Hill Rec. to blend the new development in to the overall scene.

    No doubt the management of Croydon College will be in line for a nice bonus this year.

    Liked by 1 person

    • It was the (Conservative) government who handed control of the then 6th form college to Croydon College in the 1990s, so the land was retained by the college when the school was closed. Croydon College has effectively land-banked the site ever since; as long as it had protected open space status, it could not be developed in any manner.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. derekthrower says:

    Excellent journalism. What are the odds it will be the first school with flats built on top of it? No doubt then proclaimed as a new golden age of development by “captured” Croydon Council.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Paul Miller says:

    https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10722735/filing-history
    Seems that LSL have already started plans on this without any permission by passing the plot to a subsidiary, penny sale ?, wonder why !!

    Like

  4. Lewis White says:

    Can I also thank you for this article, and also for shedding light on the way the site ended up in the hands of Croydon College. It remains a wonder why the government didn’t place a restriction on future disposal, if the college failed to carry on with the existing 6th Form College, or to use the site for its own ( new) educational purposes .

    I would agree that this site should be developed for much-needed housing, and ( as we surely don’t need another school in this area? ) not for a Grammar School. .

    derek’thrower’s comment above, about a surreal development possibility, of flats over a school, triggered a thought or two for me about what development should go here.

    A modern village for older people, with a warden?
    Flats up to 5 storeys, with lifts, for our aging population? With the park right by, it would be very pleasant for the residents. Some flats for rent, some for sale, but with covenants ensuring that they don’t get bought as Air B and B flats by investors

    On balance, children should have easy access to parks, so I hope that homes for families feature prominently. I hope that a mix of development goes there, with older people not forgotten.

    Like

  5. greencroydon says:

    Three years ago I asked the college if i could use the land to start a lavender farm. I was told back then that it would be developed. Seems that was a bit misleading if there’s no planning permission granted

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s