Labour councillor alleges planning bias for Brick by Brick

Our housing correspondent, BARRATT HOLMES, on how a Town Hall veteran has broken ranks over some of the council’s inappropriate over-development

Councillor Pat Ryan: suggested bias in the planning system

It is no longer just disgruntled residents, unhappy over the way the council and their slow-motion house-builders, Brick by Brick, are concreting over every scrap of green space in the borough who are questioning the calibre of some of the new housing that is going up.

Now even Labour councillors are beginning to ask awkward questions about how some of the Brick by Brick schemes were ever granted planning permission.

“It’s really debatable whether some of these applications, if they were submitted by a private developer, would be recommended for approval,” Pat Ryan, the veteran councillor for Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood ward, has said this week.

Of course, Inside Croydon’s loyal reader, who has been following this sorry saga knows the answer to that.

Allegations of bias within the quasi-judicial planning committee are very serious indeed, and have been made many times by angry residents who dislike the imposition of Brick by Brick schemes on their neighbourhoods. But for such an allegation to come from a long-time Croydon Labour insider suggests that the Town Hall is not such a happy camp as council leader Tony Newman would have everyone believe.

Family housing: Alison Butler and Paul Scott

The cabinet member in charge of housing is Councillor Alison Butler. Butler is married to another councillor, Paul Scott, who just happens to chair the planning committee, and has made sure that every single application submitted by Brick by Brick over the past two years has been granted.

Ryan’s comments were made to another hyperlocal news site, News From Crystal Palace, and come after growing discontent over Brick by Brick’s builds on Auckland Rise and Ravensdale Gardens.

“I wasn’t at all impressed,” Ryan said.

What Ryan has had to say will carry particular weight, since until recently the councillor was a pivotal figure within Croydon Labour’s council group, as the chief whip – the very person who was supposed to keep the borough’s Labour councillors toeing the party line.

Ryan has been a councillor since 1992, and is widely respected among residents in his ward.

The Auckland Rise scheme is particularly controversial.

Brick by Brick is building on green open space between a collection of 1960s-built former council homes and social housing.

Residents claimed at the time of the planning application that there had been no equalities impact assessment conducted by the council, as is required by law. This was particularly relevant because one of the blocks of flats affected by the new build are home to disabled residents.

The scheme provides for the seven new buildings, varying between three and four storeys tall, to provide 29 two-bedroom and 28-one bedroom flats. Of the 57 properties being built on the Upper Norwood estates, only 19 of them would be for shared ownership as “affordable” housing. All the rest would be flogged off or rented out privately.

That amounts to just 33 per cent of this development being “affordable”, a long way short of the 50 per cent which Butler has often cited as being provided through Brick by Brick developments.

Not one of the Brick by Brick homes at Auckland Rise, being built on public land and using public money, will be what could be described as a council home.

Ryan made his remarks to News From Crystal Palace’s editor, Jerry Green, during the latest developer consultation event.

Green notes that the main criticism of Brick by Brick’s nearby Ravensdale Gardens development “has been the five-storey building going up … diagonally opposite the Beulah Spa Harvester pub. The five-storey building is higher than the pub”.

Architects’ drawings from two years ago fail to convey how close the new blocks are to existing homes on Auckland Rise

Green continues: “Behind that, and hidden from the main road, Brick by Brick are building a load of houses. One of these has been built extremely close to the left of No9 Ravensdale Gardens which used to have the benefit of natural light through its side windows. Not any more.

“One resident living there told News From Crystal Palace he now has to have the light in the upstairs room on all day.”

The protection of existing dwellings’ access to light is supposed to be a principal aspect of a planning committee’s work.

The need for a proper equalities impact assessment report at Auckland Rise is becoming all too apparent now for the boxed-in residents. Brick by Brick has built a block of flats in front of one of the estate’s existing blocks which, according to Green, means “people living there who used to enjoy looking out over playing fields now just have the back of a block of flats to look at”.

Other examples on inappropriate overdevelopment through Brick by Brick’s in-fill schemes has even seen the owners of private houses in South Norwood drag the council to the High Court, through a Judicial Review. The residents lost their case.

But Inside Croydon understands that some aspect of Butler and Scott’s working relationship with Brick by Brick may yet prompt further legal action.

  • Inside Croydon is a member of the Independent Community News Network
  • Inside Croydon is the borough’s only independent news source, and still based in the heart of Croydon
  • “Monitored” by the council CEO since 2010
  • ROTTEN BOROUGH AWARDS 2017: Inside Croydon was source for two award-winning nominations in Private Eye magazine’s annual celebration of civic cock-ups
  • If you have a news story about life in or around Croydon, a residents’ or business association or a local event to publicise, please email us with full details at

About insidecroydon

News, views and analysis about the people of Croydon, their lives and political times in the diverse and most-populated borough in London. Based in Croydon and edited by Steven Downes. To contact us, please email
This entry was posted in Alison Butler, Brick by Brick, Croydon Council, Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood, Pat Ryan, Paul Scott, Planning, Tony Newman and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Labour councillor alleges planning bias for Brick by Brick

  1. Stephen Pollard says:

    Good to hear some dissent in the Labour ranks, makes me happy to hear it. We need to hear more from Cllr. Pat Ryan and to encourage others within the Labour Party and other councillors to speak out, after all, they are meant to represent the many and not the few self-interested Scott Butlers

  2. sed30 says:

    Reblogged this on sed30's Blog and commented:
    Both schemes totally unsuitable for the sites – but what do I know

  3. Dave Scott says:

    Surely there must be a conflict of interest with Scott and Butler.

    It just doesn’t seem right to me.

  4. derekthrower says:

    Counting the days until Scott and Butler are gone? They have brought planning and development in the LB of Croydon into disrepute. Has only occurred in a situation of systematic regulatory failure by a Central Government completely captured by private sector business interests. When you make governance rotten it will only inevitably lead to conflict and failure. No doubt the dynamic duo will try and make sure they are long gone by the time the fan has had a good coating.

Leave a Reply